In algebraic topology, the path space fibration over a pointed space [1] is a fibration of the form[2]

where

  • is the based path space of the pointed space ; that is, equipped with the compact-open topology.
  • is the fiber of over the base point of ; thus it is the loop space of .

The free path space of X, that is, , consists of all maps from I to X that do not necessarily begin at a base point, and the fibration given by, say, , is called the free path space fibration.

The path space fibration can be understood to be dual to the mapping cone.[clarification needed] The fiber of the based fibration is called the mapping fiber or, equivalently, the homotopy fiber.

Mapping path space

edit

If   is any map, then the mapping path space   of   is the pullback of the fibration   along  . (A mapping path space satisfies the universal property that is dual to that of a mapping cylinder, which is a push-out. Because of this, a mapping path space is also called a mapping cocylinder.[3])

Since a fibration pulls back to a fibration, if Y is based, one has the fibration

 

where   and   is the homotopy fiber, the pullback of the fibration   along  .

Note also   is the composition

 

where the first map   sends x to  ; here   denotes the constant path with value  . Clearly,   is a homotopy equivalence; thus, the above decomposition says that any map is a fibration up to homotopy equivalence.

If   is a fibration to begin with, then the map   is a fiber-homotopy equivalence and, consequently,[4] the fibers of   over the path-component of the base point are homotopy equivalent to the homotopy fiber   of  .

Moore's path space

edit

By definition, a path in a space X is a map from the unit interval I to X. Again by definition, the product of two paths   such that   is the path   given by:

 .

This product, in general, fails to be associative on the nose:  , as seen directly. One solution to this failure is to pass to homotopy classes: one has  . Another solution is to work with paths of arbitrary lengths, leading to the notions of Moore's path space and Moore's path space fibration, described below.[5] (A more sophisticated solution is to rethink composition: work with an arbitrary family of compositions; see the introduction of Lurie's paper,[6] leading to the notion of an operad.)

Given a based space  , we let

 

An element f of this set has a unique extension   to the interval   such that  . Thus, the set can be identified as a subspace of  . The resulting space is called the Moore path space of X, after John Coleman Moore, who introduced the concept. Then, just as before, there is a fibration, Moore's path space fibration:

 

where p sends each   to   and   is the fiber. It turns out that   and   are homotopy equivalent.

Now, we define the product map

 

by: for   and  ,

 .

This product is manifestly associative. In particular, with μ restricted to Ω'X × Ω'X, we have that Ω'X is a topological monoid (in the category of all spaces). Moreover, this monoid Ω'X acts on P'X through the original μ. In fact,   is an Ω'X-fibration.[7]

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Throughout the article, spaces are objects of the category of "reasonable" spaces; e.g., the category of compactly generated weak Hausdorff spaces.
  2. ^ Davis & Kirk 2001, Theorem 6.15. 2.
  3. ^ Davis & Kirk 2001, § 6.8.
  4. ^ using the change of fiber
  5. ^ Whitehead 1978, Ch. III, § 2.
  6. ^ Lurie, Jacob (October 30, 2009). "Derived Algebraic Geometry VI: E[k]-Algebras" (PDF).
  7. ^ Let G = Ω'X and P = P'X. That G preserves the fibers is clear. To see, for each γ in P, the map   is a weak equivalence, we can use the following lemma:

    Lemma — Let p: DB, q: EB be fibrations over an unbased space B, f: DE a map over B. If B is path-connected, then the following are equivalent:

    • f is a weak equivalence.
    •   is a weak equivalence for some b in B.
    •   is a weak equivalence for every b in B.

    We apply the lemma with   where α is a path in P and IX is t → the end-point of α(t). Since   if γ is the constant path, the claim follows from the lemma. (In a nutshell, the lemma follows from the long exact homotopy sequence and the five lemma.)

References

edit