A gas-fired power plant, sometimes referred to as gas-fired power station, natural gas power plant, or methane gas power plant, is a thermal power station that burns natural gas to generate electricity. Gas-fired power plants generate almost a quarter of world electricity and are significant sources of greenhouse gas emissions.[1] However, they can provide seasonal, dispatchable energy generation to compensate for variable renewable energy deficits, where hydropower or interconnectors are not available. In the early 2020s batteries became competitive with gas peaker plants.[2]
Basic concepts: heat into mechanical energy into electrical energy
editA gas-fired power plant is a type of fossil fuel power station in which chemical energy stored in natural gas, which is mainly methane, is converted successively into: thermal energy, mechanical energy and, finally, electrical energy. Although they cannot exceed the Carnot cycle limit for conversion of heat energy into useful work, the excess heat, ie the difference between the chemical energy used up and the useful work generated, may be used in cogeneration plants to heat buildings, to produce hot water, or to heat materials on an industrial scale.
Plant types
editGas turbine
edit
Industrial gas turbines differ from aeronautical designs in that the frames, bearings, and blading are of heavier construction. They are also much more closely integrated with the devices they power—often an electric generator—and the secondary-energy equipment that is used to recover residual energy (largely heat).
They range in size from portable mobile plants to large, complex systems weighing more than a hundred tonnes housed in purpose-built buildings. When the gas turbine is used solely for shaft power, its thermal efficiency is about 30%. However, it may be cheaper to buy electricity than to generate it. Therefore, many engines are used in CHP (Combined Heat and Power) configurations that can be small enough to be integrated into portable container configurations.
Gas turbines can be particularly efficient when waste heat from the turbine is recovered by a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) to power a conventional steam turbine in a combined cycle configuration.[3] The 605 MW General Electric 9HA achieved a 62.22% efficiency rate with temperatures as high as 1,540 °C (2,800 °F).[4] For 2018, GE offers its 826 MW HA at over 64% efficiency in combined cycle due to advances in additive manufacturing and combustion breakthroughs, up from 63.7% in 2017 orders and on track to achieve 65% by the early 2020s.[5] In March 2018, GE Power achieved a 63.08% gross efficiency for its 7HA turbine.[6]
Aeroderivative gas turbines can also be used in combined cycles, leading to a higher efficiency, but it will not be as high as a specifically designed industrial gas turbine. They can also be run in a cogeneration configuration: the exhaust is used for space or water heating, or drives an absorption chiller for cooling the inlet air and increase the power output, technology known as turbine inlet air cooling.
Another significant advantage is their ability to be turned on and off within minutes, supplying power during peak, or unscheduled, demand. Since single cycle (gas turbine only) power plants are less efficient than combined cycle plants, they are usually used as peaking power plants, which operate anywhere from several hours per day to a few dozen hours per year—depending on the electricity demand and the generating capacity of the region. In areas with a shortage of base-load and load following power plant capacity or with low fuel costs, a gas turbine powerplant may regularly operate most hours of the day. A large single-cycle gas turbine typically produces 100 to 400 megawatts of electric power and has 35–40% thermodynamic efficiency.[7]
Simple cycle gas-turbine
editIn a simple cycle gas-turbine, also known as open-cycle gas-turbine (OCGT) generators, hot gas drives a gas turbine to generate electricity. This type of plant is relatively cheap to build and can start very quickly, but due to its lower efficiency is at most only run for a few hours a day as a peaking power plant.[8]
Combined cycle gas-turbine (CCGT)
edit CCGT power plants consist of simple cycle gas-turbines which use the Brayton cycle, followed by a heat recovery steam generator and a steam turbine which use the Rankine cycle. The most common configuration is two gas-turbines supporting one steam turbine.[9] They are slightly more expensive than simple cycle plants but can achieve efficiencies up to 55% and dispatch times of around half an hour.[10]
Reciprocating engine
editReciprocating internal combustion engines tend to be under 20 MW, thus much smaller than other types of natural gas-fired electricity generator, and are typically used for emergency power or to balance variable renewable energy such as wind and solar.[11]
Greenhouse gas emissions
editRelatively efficient gas-fired power stations – such as those based on combined cycle gas turbines – emit about 450 grams (16 oz) of CO2 per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated.[12][13] This is about half that of coal-fired power stations but much more than nuclear power plants and renewable energy.[12] However, the more flexible simple-cycle turbines have a significantly higher emissions intensity, frequently as high as 670 grams (24 oz) of CO2 per kWh,[14] and some older gas turbines can have emissions intensities comparable with even the most emissions intensive coal power stations.[15]
However, full Life-cycle emissions of gas-fired power stations is badly impacted by methane emissions such as from gas leaks from mining and pipelines[16][17] and from significant venting of waste CO2 after amine gas treating if carbon capture and storage is employed.
Carbon capture
editVery few power plants have carbon capture and storage.[18]
Hydrogen
editGas-fired power plants can be modified to run on hydrogen,[19] and according to General Electric a more economically viable option than CCS would be to use more and more hydrogen in the gas turbine fuel.[20] Hydrogen can at first be created from natural gas through steam reforming, or by heating to precipitate carbon, as a step towards a hydrogen economy, thus eventually reducing carbon emissions.[21] However others think low-carbon hydrogen (such as natural hydrogen) should be used for things which are harder to decarbonize, such as making fertilizer, so there may not be enough for electricity generation.[22]
Economics
editNew plants
editSometimes a new battery storage power station together with solar power or wind power is cheaper in the long-term than building a new gas plant, as the gas plant risks becoming a stranded asset.[23]
Existing plants
editAs of 2019[update] a few gas-fired power plants are being retired because they are unable to stop and start quickly enough.[24] Despite the falling cost of variable renewable energy most existing gas-fired power plants remain profitable, especially in countries without a carbon price, due to their dispatchable generation and because shale gas and liquefied natural gas prices have fallen since they were built.[25] Even in places with a carbon price, such as the EU, existing gas-fired power stations remain economically viable, partly due to increasing restrictions on coal-fired power because of its pollution.[26]
Politics
editEven when replacing coal power, the decision to build a new plant may be controversial.[27]
See also
editExternal links
editReferences
edit- ^ "Clean fuel? Methane leaks threaten natural gas' climate-friendly image". Reuters. 29 June 2018. Archived from the original on 15 February 2019. Retrieved 30 June 2019.
- ^ Mcfarlane, Sarah; Twidale, Susanna (21 November 2023). "Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants". Reuters. Retrieved 21 November 2023.
- ^ Langston, Lee S. (July 2012). "Efficiency by the Numbers". Archived from the original on 7 February 2013.
- ^ Kellner, Tomas (17 June 2016). "Here's Why The Latest Guinness World Record Will Keep France Lit Up Long After Soccer Fans Leave" (Press release). General Electric. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 21 June 2016.
- ^ "HA technology now available at industry-first 64 percent efficiency" (Press release). GE Power. 4 December 2017.
- ^ "GE's HA Gas Turbine Delivers Second World Record for Efficiency" (Press release). GE Power. 27 March 2018.
- ^ Ratliff, Phil; Garbett, Paul; Fischer, Willibald (September 2007). "The New Siemens Gas Turbine SGT5-8000H for More Customer Benefit" (PDF). VGB PowerTech. Siemens Power Generation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 August 2011. Retrieved 17 July 2010.
- ^ "Simple cycle gas plant - Energy Education". energyeducation.ca. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
- ^ "Power blocks in natural gas-fired combined-cycle plants are getting bigger - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
- ^ "Combined cycle gas plant - Energy Education". energyeducation.ca. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
- ^ "Natural gas-fired reciprocating engines are being deployed more to balance renewables - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
- ^ a b Rueter, Gero (27 December 2021). "How sustainable is wind power?". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
An onshore wind turbine that is newly built today produces around nine grams of CO2 for every kilowatt hour (kWh) it generates ... a new offshore plant in the sea emits seven grams of CO2 per kWh ... solar power plants emit 33 grams CO2 for every kWh generated ... natural gas produces 442 grams CO2 per kWh, power from hard coal 864 grams, and power from lignite, or brown coal, 1034 grams ... nuclear energy accounts for about 117 grams of CO2 per kWh, considering the emissions caused by uranium mining and the construction and operation of nuclear reactors.
- ^ Rosselot, Kirsten S.; Allen, David T.; Ku, Anthony Y. (5 July 2021). "Comparing Greenhouse Gas Impacts from Domestic Coal and Imported Natural Gas Electricity Generation in China". ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 9 (26): 8759–8769. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01517. ISSN 2168-0485. S2CID 237875562.
- ^ McConnell, Dylan (24 February 2017). "Our power grid is crying out for capacity, but should we open the gas valves?". The Conversation. Retrieved 25 October 2024.
- ^ Gordon, Josh (3 November 2020). "Adam Bandt says gas is just as dirty as coal. Is he correct?". RMIT ABC Fact Check. Retrieved 25 October 2024.
- ^ "A satellite finds massive methane leaks from gas pipelines". NPR.org. Retrieved 9 May 2022.
- ^ https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy00osti/27715.pdf
- ^ Chemnick, Jean (9 May 2022). "Why EPA might make new gas plants catch carbon". E&E News. Retrieved 9 May 2022.
- ^ "The plan to convert the North to run on hydrogen". Utility Week. 30 November 2018.
- ^ "GE: Hydrogen trumps carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) in preserving gas turbines in a carbon-free grid". Utility Dive. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
- ^ "H-vision: blue hydrogen for a green future". Gas World. 11 February 2019. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
- ^ "Hydrogen could be used for nearly everything. It probably shouldn't be". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 5 October 2024.
- ^ Andrew Burger (7 October 2019). "Natural Gas Power Stranded Asset Risk Reaches a Tipping Point". Solar Magazine. Retrieved 20 October 2019.
- ^ Geuss, Megan (26 June 2019). "A 10-year-old natural gas plant in California gets the coal plant treatment". Ars Technica. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
- ^ Ram, R. Sree (28 June 2019). "Torrent Power shares make a powerful leap after Gujarat arrangement". Retrieved 28 June 2019.
- ^ "Natural gas price plunge signals greener start for 2019 in U.S. and EU". www.worldoil.com. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
- ^ Harrabin, Roger (7 October 2019). "UK overrules block on Drax power station plans". Retrieved 20 October 2019.