Nawab Sayyid Hussain Ali Khan Barha (1666 – 8 October 1720), officially Itisham-ul-Mulk,[1] was a kingmaker of the later Mughal Period. Best known for ordering the death of the Emperor Farrukhsiyar largely in attempt to halt the numerous assaination attempts that the latter had ordered against him and his brother Abdullah Khan Barha. Hussain Ali Khan rose as a kingmaker in early 18th century India, when he was concurrently the governor of Ajmer and Aurangabad in the Deccan.[2]

Hussain Ali Khan Barha
Subahdar of Aurangabad
Subahdar of Multan
Faujdar of Ranthambore
Subahdar of Bihar
Faujdar of Hindaun-Bayana
Umdat-ul-mulk, Amir-ul-Umara, Bahadur, Feroze Jung, Sipah Sardar, Mir Bakhshi
A portfolio of Hussain Ali Khan. The Nastaliq script read: Amir al Umara, Nawab Sayyid Hussain Ali Khan Sakin Barha.
Amir-ul-Umara Sayyid Hussain Ali Khan
Nawab of Aurangabad
Under nominal Mughal suzerainty1715 – 8 October 1720
PredecessorDianat Khan
SuccessorNizam ul-Mulk
BornHussain Ali Khan
1666
Jansath
Died8 October 1720(1720-10-08) (aged 53–54)
Burial
Maqbara of Sayyid Mian, Ajmer
Names
Umdat Al Mulk, Amir Al Umara, Nawab Sayyid Hussain Ali Khan Sakin Barha
Regnal name
Umdat Al Mulk
HouseBarha
FatherSayyid Mian Abdullah Khan I
ReligionIslam
OccupationCommander of Mughal Forces

Both Hussain Ali Khan and his brother, Abdullah Khan II, had a hand in the installation or deposition (or both installation and deposition) of several emperors to the throne at Delhi, including: Bahadur Shah I,[3] Jahandar Shah,[4] Farrukhsiyar, Rafi ud Darajat, Shah Jahan II,[5] Ibrahim[6] and Muhammad Shah.[7] and eventually became de facto rulers of the sub-continent by the early 18th century, at a time when India's economy was the largest in the world.[8]

Early life and family

edit

Barha was the second son of the Nawab of Ajmer, Mian Abdullah Khan I. Barha dynasty, to which Hussain Ali Khan belonged, was of peasant origins, and his ancestors had moved at an uncertain date from their homeland in Punjab to a barren region in Muzaffarnagar district of Uttar Pradesh.[9] Although Barhas claimed to be descendants of Muhammad, or Sayyids, this claim was always dubious.[9][10] Emperor Jahangir, although noting that people questioned their lineage, considered their bravery as a proof of their claims.[9] They took much pride in their Indian ancestry,[10] and according to the American historian Richard M. Eaton, were "as native to India as were Jats, Rajputs or Marathas."[11] By the time of Emperor Aurangzeb, the dynasty was firmly regarded as "Old Nobility" and held realms of Ajmer and Dakhin.[12] The Sadaat-e-Bara tribe, due to their reputation, acquired a hereditary right to lead the vanguard of imperial Mughal armies in every battle.[13] The Mughal emperor Jahangir remarked that the Sadaat-e-Bara were "averters of calamity from this dominion".[14]

 
A cavalryman of the Saadat-e Barah

He started his early career as a Faujdar under Aurangzeb's reign and eventually gained higher positions after backing Bahadur Shah I in the succession war ensuing Aurangzeb's death.

Biography

edit

Hussain Ali Khan served as the Commander-in-chief and Mir Bakhshi of the Mughal Empire.[15][16] the Sipahsalar,[17] and the Amir al-umara (Chief of all nobles),[18] and personally oversaw the end of Ajit Singh's rebellion.[19] He was appointed the Viceroy of the six provinces of the Deccan, after which he broke the peace agreements with the Marathas and engaged in open warfare with all the Maratha chieftains without discrimination.[20] Intoxicated with power, with passing through the territory of Jai Singh, he pillaged the wayside villages of Jaipur and its innocent peasantry, and refused to accept presents from a high-ranking officer.[21] He was inclined to use of exaggerated and insolent language, and flatterers in the camp of Hussain Ali Khan used to recite the verses, even in the Emperor's presence[22]

"The whole world and all creation seeks the shelter of your umbrella,
Kings of the world earn crowns through your emprize."

He is noted by William Irvine to have been "Really friendly to the poor and non-oppressive in disposition." During his time as the administrator of Aurangabad, Barha began a reservoir, a bridge and other works for the public.[23]

Death

edit

He was eventually assassinated by Turkish nobles also known as the Turani faction. On the pretext of presenting a petition concerning his malnourished troops, Haider Beg Dughlat fatally stabbed Hussain Ali Khan as his attention was diverted to reading the petition. Haider Beg Dughlat was immediately killed by Hussain Ali Khan's fourteen year old nephew Sayyid Nurallah Khan (Sayyid Nur Ali) who was himself immediately killed by Mughal troops. According to the historian Khizr Khan, Hussain Ali Khan was buried in his fathers tomb at Ajmer.[24]

Titles

edit

Upon helping the Emperor Farrukhsiyar to the throne of Delhi, Hussain Ali Khan Barha was awarded with the position of Mir Bakhshi and granted the following titles and appellations: Umdat-ul-mulk, Amir-ul-Umara, Bahadur, Feroze Jung, Sipah Sardar.

Depictions

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ David Ross (1883). The land of the five rivers and Sindh. Chapman and Hall.
  2. ^ Irvine, William. The Later Mughals. p. 34 (Vol.2). ISBN 9649700471.
  3. ^ Irvine, William (August 2012). The Later Mughals. p. 204. ISBN 978-1290917766.
  4. ^ Irvine, William (2006). The later Mughals. Low Price Publications. p. 205. ISBN 8175364068.
  5. ^ Kazim, Sayyid Ali. A critical study of the role and achievements of Sayyid brothers (Report). p. 1. hdl:10603/57016.
  6. ^ "Past Present: King Makers". November 2009.
  7. ^ "List Of Rulers Of South Asia". www.metmuseum.org.
  8. ^ The world economy : historical statistics. Development Centre of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 25 September 2003. ISBN 978-92-64-10414-3.
  9. ^ a b c Kolff, Dirk H. A. 2002, p. 18.
  10. ^ a b Reichmuth, Stefan 2009, p. 4.
  11. ^ Eaton, Richard M. (2020). India in the Persianate Age: 1000-1765. National Geographic Books. p. 342. ISBN 978-0-14-198539-8. On one side were the Saiyid brothers, whose Barha clan of Indian Muslims was as native to India as were Jats, Rajputs or Marathas.
  12. ^ Irvine, William (August 2012). The Later Mughals. p. 203. ISBN 978-1290917766.
  13. ^ William Irvine (1971). Later Mughal. Atlantic Publishers & Distri. p. 202.
  14. ^ Kapur Singh; Madanjit Kaur; Piāra Siṅgha (1995). Sikhism for Modern Man. Guru Nanak Dev University.
  15. ^ Visheshwar Sarup Bhargava (1966). Marwar and the Mughal Emperors (A. D. 1526-1748). the University of California. p. 150. ISBN 9788121504003.
  16. ^ "Mughal Administration 2 of 16". www.columbia.edu. Columbia University.,
  17. ^ Jaswant Lal Mehta (2005). Advanced Study in the History of Modern India 1707-1813. New Dawn Press, Incorporated. ISBN 9781932705546.
  18. ^ Ippolito Desideri (2010). Mission to Tibet: The Extraordinary Eighteenth-Century Account of Father Ippolito Desideri S. J. Simon and Schuster. p. 141. ISBN 9780861716760.
  19. ^ Irvine, William (August 2012). The Later Mughals. p. 287. ISBN 978-1290917766.
  20. ^ Jaswant Mehta (2005). Advanced Study in the History of Modern India 1707-1813. Publisher:New Dawn Press, Incorporated. p. 75. ISBN 9781932705546.
  21. ^ Harish Chandra Tikkiwal (1974). Jaipur and the Later Mughals (1707-1803 A.D.). p. 43.
  22. ^ William Irvine (1971). Later Mughal.
  23. ^ Irvine, William (2007). Later Mughals. Sang-e-Meel Publications. p. 96. ISBN 978-9693519242.
  24. ^ Irvine, William (2007). Later Mughals. Sang-e-Meel Publications. pp. 59–60. ISBN 978-9693519242.

Sources

edit