Human zoos, also known as ethnological expositions, were public displays of people, usually in a so-called "natural" or "primitive" state.[3] They were most prominent during the 19th and 20th centuries.[3] These displays sometimes emphasized the supposed inferiority of the exhibits' culture, and implied the superiority of "Western society", through tropes that purported marginalized groups as "savage".[4][5] They then developed into independent displays emphasizing the exhibits' inferiority to western culture and providing further justification for their subjugation.[6] Such displays featured in multiple colonial exhibitions and at temporary exhibitions in animal zoos.[7]
Etymology
editThe term "human zoo" was not generally used by contemporaries of the shows, and was popularised by the French researcher Pascal Blanchard. The term has been criticised for denying the agency of the shows' non-European performers.[8]
Circuses and freak shows
editThe abstract concept of human displays in zoos has been documented throughout the duration of colonial history. In the Western Hemisphere, one of the earliest-known zoos, that of Moctezuma in Mexico, consisted not only of a vast collection of animals, but also exhibited humans, for example, dwarves, albinos and hunchbacks.[9]
One of the first modern public human exhibitions was P. T. Barnum's exhibition of Joice Heth on 25 February 1835[10] and, subsequently, the Siamese twins Chang and Eng Bunker. These exhibitions were common in freak shows.[11] Another famous example was that of Saartjie Baartman of the Namaqua, often referred to as the Hottentot Venus, who was displayed in London and France until her death in 1815.
During the 1850s, Maximo and Bartola, two microcephalic children from El Salvador, were exhibited in the US and Europe under the names Aztec Children and Aztec Lilliputians.[12] However, human zoos would become common only in the 1870s in the midst of the New Imperialism period.
From 1936 to 1943, the Canadian province of Ontario displayed five White French Canadian quintuplets, whom the provincial government had removed from their birth family, in a human zoo called Quintland.[13]
Start of human exhibits
editExhibitions would lean towards stereotyping, and projecting western superiority.[7] Greater feeding into the Imperialist narrative, that these people's culture merited subjugation.[14] It also promoted scientific racism, where they were classified as more or less 'civilized' on a scale, from great apes to western Europeans.[15]
Hagenbeck would go on to launch a Nubian Exhibit in 1876, and an Inuit exhibit in 1880.[16] These were also massively successful.
Aside from Hagenbeck, the Jardin d'Acclimatation was also a hotspot of ethnological exhibits. Geoffroy de Saint-Hilaire, director of the Jardin d'Acclimatation, decided in 1877 to organize two ethnological exhibits that also presented Nubians and Inuit. That year, the audience of the Jardin d'acclimatation' doubled to one million. Between 1877 and 1912, approximately thirty ethnological exhibitions were presented at the Jardin zoologique d'acclimatation.[17]
These displays were so successful they were incorporated into both the 1878 and the 1889 Parisian World's Fair, which presented a 'Negro Village'. Visited by 28 million people, the 1889 World's Fair displayed 400 indigenous people as the major attraction.
In Amsterdam the International Colonial and Export Exhibition had a display of people native to Suriname, in 1883.
In 1886, the Spanish displayed natives of the Philippines in an exhibition, as people whom they "civilized". This event added flame to the 1896 Philippine revolution.[18] Queen Consort of Spain, Maria Cristina of Austria, afterwards institutionalized the business of human zoos. By 1887, indigenous Igorot people & animals were sent to Madrid and were exhibited in a human zoo at the newly constructed Palacio de Cristal del Retiro.[19]
At both the 1893 World's Columbian Exposition and the 1901 Pan-American Exposition[20] Little Egypt, a bellydancer, was photographed as a catalogued "type" by Charles Dudley Arnold and Harlow Higginbotha.[21]
At the 1895 African Exhibition in The Crystal Palace, around eighty people from Somalia were displayed in an "exotic" setting.[22]
The Brussels International Exposition (1897) in Tervuren featured a "Congolese Village" that displayed African people in ersatz interpretations of native settings.
German ethnographs
editEthnology studies in Germany took a new approach in the 1870s as human displays were incorporated into zoos. These exhibits were lauded as 'educational' to the general population by the scientific community. Very quickly, the exhibits were used as a way to show that Europeans had "evolved" into a 'superior', 'cosmopolitan' life.[23]
In the late 19th century, German ethnographic museums were seen as an empirical study of human culture. They contained artifacts from cultures around the world organized by continent allowing visitors to see the similarities and differences between the groups and "form their own ideas".[23]
Objectification in human zoos
editWithin the history of human zoos, there are patterns of overt sexual representation of displayed peoples, most frequently women. Such objectification often led to treatment that reflected a lack of privacy and respect, including the dissection and display of bodies after death without consent.
An example of the sexualization of ethnically diverse women in Europe is Saartje Baartman, often referred to as her anglicized name Sarah Bartmann. Bartmann was displayed both when she was alive throughout England and Ireland and after her death in the Musée de l'Homme.[24] While alive, she participated in a traveling show depicting her as a "savage female" with a large focus on her body. The clothes she was put in were tight and close to her skin color, and spectators were encouraged to "see for themselves" if Bartmann's body, particularly her buttocks, were real through "poking and pushing".[24] Her living display was financially compensated but there is no record of her consenting to be examined and displayed after death.
Dominika Czarnecka theorizes on the relationship between the radicalization and sexualization of black female bodies in her journal article "Black Female Bodies and the 'White' View."[25] Czarnecka focuses on ethnographic shows that were prominent in Polish territory in the late 19th century. She argues that an essential part of why these shows were so popular is the display of the black female body. Although the women in the shows were meant to be depicting Amazon warriors, their wardrobe was not similar to amazonian dress, and there are several documentations of comments from spectators about their revealing clothes and their bodies.[25]
Although women were most frequently objectified, there are a few instances of "exotic" men being displayed due to their favorable appearance. Angelo Solimann was brought to Italy as a slave from Central Africa in the 18th century, but ended up gaining a reputation in Viennese society for his fighting skills and vast knowledge about language and history. Upon his death in 1796, this positive association did not prevent his body being "stuffed and exhibited in the Viennese Natural History Museum" for almost a decade.[26]
Around the turn of the century
editIn 1896, to increase the number of visitors, the Cincinnati Zoo invited one hundred Sioux Native Americans to establish a village at the site. The Sioux lived at the zoo for three months.[27]
The 1900 World's Fair presented the famous diorama living in Madagascar, while the Colonial exhibitions in Marseilles (1906 and 1922) and in Paris (1907 and 1931) also displayed humans in cages, often nude or semi-nude. The 1931 exhibition in Paris was so successful that 34 million people attended it in six months, while a smaller counter-exhibition entitled The Truth on the Colonies, organized by the Communist Party, attracted very few visitors—in the first room, it recalled Albert Londres and André Gide's critiques of forced labour in the colonies. Nomadic Senegalese Villages were also presented.[citation needed]
In 1906, Madison Grant—socialite, eugenicist, amateur anthropologist, and head of the New York Zoological Society—had Congolese pygmy Ota Benga put on display at the Bronx Zoo in New York City alongside apes and other animals. At the behest of Grant, the zoo director William Hornaday placed Benga displayed in a cage with the chimpanzees, then with an orangutan named Dohong, and a parrot, and labeled him The Missing Link, suggesting that in evolutionary terms Africans like Benga were closer to apes than were Europeans. It triggered protests from the city's clergymen, but the public reportedly flocked to see it.[28][29]
On Monday, 8 September 1906, after just two days, Hornaday decided to close the exhibition, and Benga could be found walking the zoo grounds, often followed by a crowd "howling, jeering and yelling."[30]
First organized backlash
editAccording to The New York Times, although "few expressed audible objection to the sight of a human being in a cage with monkeys as companions", controversy erupted as black clergymen in the city took great offense. "Our race, we think, is depressed enough, without exhibiting one of us with the apes", said the Reverend James H. Gordon, superintendent of the Howard Colored Orphan Asylum in Brooklyn. "We think we are worthy of being considered human beings, with souls."[30]
New York City Mayor George B. McClellan Jr. refused to meet with the clergymen, drawing the praise of Hornaday, who wrote to him: "When the history of the Zoological Park is written, this incident will form its most amusing passage."[30]
As the controversy continued, Hornaday remained unapologetic, insisting that his only intention was to put on an ethnological exhibition. In another letter, he said that he and Grant—who ten years later would publish the racist tract The Passing of the Great Race—considered it "imperative that the society should not even seem to be dictated to" by the black clergymen.[30]
1903 saw one of the first widespread protests against human zoos, at the "Human Pavilion" of an exposition in Osaka, Japan. The exhibition of Koreans and Okinawans in "primitive" housing incurred protests from the governments of Korea and Okinawa, and a Formosan woman wearing Chinese dress angered a group of Chinese students studying abroad in Tokyo. An Ainu schoolteacher was made to exhibit himself in the zoo to raise money for his schoolhouse, as the Japanese government refused to pay. The fact that the schoolteacher made eloquent speeches and fundraised for his school while wearing traditional dress confused the spectators. An anonymous front-page column in a Japanese magazine condemned these examples and the "Human Pavilion" in total, calling it inhumane to exhibit people as spectacles.[31]
St. Louis World's Fair
editIn 1904, over 1,100 Filipinos were displayed at the St. Louis World's Fair in association with the 1904 Summer Olympics. Following the Spanish-American War, the United States had just acquired new territories such as Guam, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico.[32] The organizers of the World's Fair held "Anthropology Days" on August 12 and 13. Since the 1889 Paris Exposition, human zoos, as a key feature of world's fairs, functioned as demonstrations of anthropological notions of race, progress, and civilization. These goals were followed also at the 1904 World's Fair. Fourteen hundred indigenous people from Southeast Asia, the Pacific Islands, East Asia, Africa, the Middle East, South America and North America were displayed in anthropological exhibits that showed them in their natural habitats. Another 1600 indigenous people displayed their culture in other areas of the Louisiana Purchase Exposition (LPE), including on the fairgrounds and at the Model School, where American Indian boarding school students demonstrated their successful assimilation.[33] The sporting event itself took place with the participation of about 100 paid indigenous men (no women participated in Anthropology Days, though some, notably the Fort Shaw Indian School girls basketball team, did compete in other athletic events at the LPE). Contests included "baseball throwing, shot put, running, broad jumping, weight lifting, pole climbing, and tugs-of-war before a crowd of approximately ten thousand".[34] According to theorist Susan Brownell, world's fairs – with their inclusion of human zoos – and the Olympics were a logical fit at this time, as they "were both linked to an underlying cultural logic that gave them a natural affinity".[35] Also, one of the original intentions of Anthropology Days was to create publicity for the official Olympic events.[36][37]
While Anthropology Days were not officially part of the Olympics program, they were closely associated with each other at the time, and in history—Brownell notes that even today historians still debate as to which of the LPE events were the "real" Olympic Games.[38] Additionally, almost all of the 400 athletic events were referred to as "Olympian,"[38] and the opening ceremony was held in May[39] with dignitaries in attendance, though the official Olympic program did not begin until July 1.[39] Also, as previously noted, one of the original intentions of Anthropology Days was to create publicity for the official Olympic events.[40][41]
Anthropology Days took place on August 11 and 12, 1904, with about 100 paid indigenous men (no women participated in Anthropology Days, though some, notably the Fort Shaw Indian School girls basketball team, did compete in other athletic events at the LPE). Contests included "baseball throwing, shot put, running, broad jumping, weight lifting, pole climbing, and tugs-of-war before a crowd of approximately ten thousand".[42]
The exhibitions of the World's Fair inspired US military officer Truman Hunt to start his own human zoo of "Head-Hunting Igorrotes" in Brooklyn. Reports of questionable living conditions for its Filipino performers led the US Federal government to investigate Hunt's exhibition, and eventually shut it down after Hunt was found guilty of wage theft from the performers.[43]
United Kingdom and France
editBetween 1 May and 31 October 1908 the Scottish National Exhibition, opened by one of Queen Victoria's grandsons, Prince Arthur of Connaught, was held in Saughton Park, Edinburgh. One of the attractions was the Senegal Village with its French-speaking Senegalese residents, on show demonstrating their way of life, art and craft while living in beehive huts.[44][45]
In 1909, the infrastructure of the 1908 Scottish National Exhibition in Edinburgh was used to construct the new Marine Gardens to the coast near Edinburgh at Portobello. A group of Somali men, women and children were shipped over to be part of the exhibition, living in thatched huts.[46][47]
In 1925, a display at Belle Vue Zoo in Manchester, England, was entitled "Cannibals" and featured black Africans in supposedly native dress.[48]
In 1931, around 100 other New Caledonian Kanaks were put on display at the Jardin d'Acclimatation in Paris.[49]
Spain
editUnited States (1930s)
editBy the 1930s, a new kind of human zoo appeared in America, nude shows masquerading as education. These included the Zoro Garden Nudist Colony at the Pacific International Exposition in San Diego, California (1935–36) and the Sally Rand Nude Ranch at the Golden Gate International Exposition in San Francisco (1939). The former was supposedly a real nudist colony, which used hired performers instead of actual nudists. The latter featured women wearing cowboy hats, gunbelts and boots, and little else. The Golden Gate fair also featured a "Greenwich Village" show, described in the Official Guide Book as "Model artists' colony and revue theatre."[50]
Ethnological expositions during Nazi Germany
editAs ethnogenic expositions were discontinued in Germany around 1931,[51] there were many repercussions for the performers. Many of the people brought from their homelands to work in the exhibits had created families in Germany, and there were many children that had been born in Germany. Once they no longer worked in the zoos or for performance acts, these people were stuck living in Germany where they had no rights and were harshly discriminated against. During the rise of the Nazi party, the foreign actors in these stage shows were typically able to stay out of concentration camps because there were so few of them that the Nazis did not see them as a real threat.[52] Although they were able to avoid concentration camps, they were not able to participate in German life as citizens of ethnically German origin could. The Hitler Youth did not allow children of foreign parents to participate, and adults were rejected as German soldiers.[52] Many ended up working in war industry factories or foreign laborer camps.[52]
Hans Massaquoi in his 1999 book Destined to Witness observed a human zoo within the Hamburg zoo Tierpark Hagenbeck during the pre-Nazi Germany period, in which an African family was placed with the animals, openly laughed at, and otherwise treated rudely by the public crowd. And then they turned upon him, a fellow spectator, due to his mixed appearance. The date, according to his book, was approximately 1930.[53]
Exhibitions after 1940
editAs part of the Portuguese World Exhibition in 1940, members of a tribe from the Bissagos Islands of Guinea-Bissau were displayed on an island in a lake in the Lisbon Tropical Botanical Garden.[54]
A Congolese village was displayed at the Brussels 1958 World's Fair.[55] The Congolese on display were among 598 people—including 273 men, 128 women and 197 children, a total of 183 families.[56] Eight-month-old baby Juste Bonaventure Langa died during Expo 58; he rests in the Tervuren cemetery.[57] In mid-July the Congolese protested the condescending treatment they were receiving from spectators and demanded to be sent home, abruptly ending the exhibit and eliciting some sympathy from European newspapers.[58]
In April 1994, an example of an Ivory Coast village was presented as part of an African safari in Port-Saint-Père, near Nantes, in France, later called Planète Sauvage.[59]
In July 2005, the Augsburg Zoo in Germany hosted an "African village" featuring African crafts and African cultural performances. The event was subject to widespread criticism.[60] Defenders of the event argued that it was not racist since it did not involve exhibiting Africans in a debasing way, as had been done at zoos in the past. Critics argued that presenting African culture in the context of a zoo contributed to exoticizing and stereotyping Africans, thus laying the ground work for racial discrimination, and that solidarity and mutual understanding with African people were not primary aims of the event.[61]
In August 2005, London Zoo displayed four human volunteers wearing fig leaves (and bathing suits) for four days.[62]
In 2007, Adelaide Zoo ran a Human Zoo exhibition which consisted of a group of people who, as part of a study exercise, had applied to be housed in the former ape enclosure by day, but then returned home by night.[63] The inhabitants took part in several exercises, and spectators were asked for donations towards a new ape enclosure.
In August 2014, as part of the Edinburgh International Festival, South African theatre-maker Brett Bailey's show Exhibit B was performed in the Playfair Library Hall, University of Edinburgh; then in September at The Barbican in London. This explored the nature of Human Zoos and raised much controversy both amongst the performers and the audiences.[64]
With a view to tackling the morality of Human Zoo exhibits, 2018 saw the poster exhibition, Putting People on Display, tour Glasgow School of Art, the University of Edinburgh, the University of Stirling, the University of St Andrews and the University of Aberdeen. Additional posters were added to a selection from the French ACHAC's exhibition, Human Zoos: the Invention of the Savage, in relation to the Scottish dimension in hosting such shows.[65]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Zwick, Jim (4 March 1996). "Remembering St. Louis, 1904: A World on Display and Bontoc Eulogy". Syracuse University. Archived from the original on 10 June 2007. Retrieved 25 May 2007.
- ^ Love, Robertus (May 1904). "Filipino School at World's Fair". The School News and Practical Educator. Archived from the original on 27 October 2021. Retrieved 3 March 2020.
- ^ a b "The True Story of the Mindanaoan Slave Whose Skin Was Displayed at Oxford". Esquiremag.ph. Archived from the original on 4 November 2017. Retrieved 7 August 2020.
- ^ Abbattista, Guido; Iannuzzi, Giulia (2016). "World Expositions as Time Machines: Two Views of the Visual Construction of Time between Anthropology and Futurama". World History Connected. 13 (3). Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 6 April 2019.
- ^ McLean, Ian (2009–2012). "Reinventing the Savage". Third Text. 26 (5): 599–613. doi:10.1080/09528822.2012.712769. ISSN 0952-8822. S2CID 143936550. Archived from the original on 7 April 2015. Retrieved 20 March 2022.
- ^ Lewis, Barry; Jurmain, Robert; Kilgore, Lynn (2008). Cengage Advantage Books: Understanding Humans: An Introduction to Physical Anthropology and Archaeology. Cengage Learning. p. 172. ISBN 978-0495604747.
- ^ a b "Colonial Exhibitions, 'Völkerschauen' and the Display of the 'Other'". EGO (in German). Archived from the original on 15 November 2020. Retrieved 14 November 2020.
- ^ Hilke Thode-Arora (22 December 2021). Demski, Dagnosław; Czarnecka, Dominika (eds.). Staged Otherness: Ethnic Shows in Central and Eastern Europe, 1850–1939. Central European University Press. pp. 45–75. ISBN 9789633866887.
- ^ Mullan, Bob and Marvin Garry, Zoo culture: The book about watching people watch animals, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, Second edition, 1998, p. 32. ISBN 0252067622
- ^ "The Museum of Hoaxes". Archived from the original on 29 May 2013. Retrieved 11 April 2016.
- ^ "On A Neglected Aspect Of Western Racism" Archived 16 August 2014 at the Wayback Machine by Kurt Jonassohn, December 2000, Montreal Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies
- ^ Roberto Aguirre, Informal Empire: Mexico And Central America In Victorian Culture, Univ. of Minnesota Press, 2004, ch. 4
- ^ Emery, Tom (28 May 2022). "Quintuplets' story remains one of shame, regret; sisters lives on display for the fortune of others". Journal-Courier. Retrieved 6 September 2024.
- ^ Conklin, Alice L.; Fletcher, Ian Christopher (1999). European imperialism, 1830–1930: climax and contradiction. Boston. ISBN 0395903858. OCLC 41211098.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Lewis, R. Barry; Jurmain, Robert; Kilgore, Lynn (2010). Understanding humans: introduction to physical anthropology and archaeology (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-0495604174. OCLC 276822759.
- ^ The International Journal of African Historical Studies. Africana Publishing Company. 1985. Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved 14 November 2020.
- ^ "The Human Zoo: Science's Dirty Secret" (PDF). usd116.org. Channel Four Television Corporation. 2009. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 July 2011. Retrieved 6 February 2011.
- ^ Arcilla, Jose S. (1991). "The Enlightenment and the Philippine Revolution". Philippine Studies. 39 (3): 358–373. JSTOR 42633263.
- ^ Limos, M. A. (2020). The Story Behind Spain's Infamous Zoo That Featured Philippine Animals... And Then Filipinos. Esquire Publications.
- ^ See Charles Dudley Arnold's photo Archived 5 July 2008 at the Wayback Machine similar human displays had been seen of six men dressed in Native-American costume, in front and on top of a reconstruction of a Six-Nations Long House.
- ^ Anne Maxell, "Montrer l'Autre: Franz Boas et les soeurs Gerhard", in Zoos humains. De la Vénus hottentote aux reality shows, Nicolas Bancel, Pascal Blanchard, Gilles Boëtsch, Eric Deroo, Sandrine Lemaire, edition La Découverte (2002), pp. 331–339, in part. p. 333,
- ^ "Victorian London – Entertainment and Recreation – Exhibitions – The African Exhibition". victorianlondon.org. Archived from the original on 29 January 2022. Retrieved 20 March 2022.
- ^ a b Penny, H. Glenn (2002). Objects of culture: ethnology and ethnographic museums in Imperial Germany. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 0807862193. OCLC 55602080.
- ^ a b Lederman, Muriel; Bartsch, Ingrid (2001). The gender and science reader. Routledge. ISBN 0415213576. OCLC 44426765.
- ^ a b Czarnecka, Dominika (9 November 2020). "Black Female Bodies and the "White" View". East Central Europe. 47 (2–3): 285–312. doi:10.30965/18763308-04702006. ISSN 0094-3037. S2CID 230653783.
- ^ Kontler, László (9 November 2020). "Relocating the "Human Zoo": Exotic Displays, Metropolitan Identity, and Ethnographic Knowledge in Late Nineteenth-Century Budapest". East Central Europe. 47 (2–3): 173–201. doi:10.30965/18763308-04702002. ISSN 0094-3037. S2CID 230656558.
- ^ Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden Archived 7 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Ohio Historical Society.
- ^ a b "Man and Monkey Show Disapproved by Clergy" Archived 8 May 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, 10 September 1906.
- ^ Bradford, Phillips Verner and Blume, Harvey. Ota Benga: The Pygmy in the Zoo. St. Martins Press, 1992.
- ^ a b c d Keller, Mitch (6 August 2006). "The Scandal at the Zoo". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 28 November 2018. Retrieved 7 July 2008.
- ^ Ziomek, Kirsten L. (2014). "The 1903 Human Pavilion: Colonial Realities and Subaltern Subjectivities in Twentieth-Century Japan". The Journal of Asian Studies. 73 (2): 493–516. doi:10.1017/S0021911814000011. ISSN 0021-9118. JSTOR 43553298. S2CID 162521059.
- ^ Jim Zwick (4 March 1996). "Remembering St. Louis, 1904: A World on Display and Bontoc Eulogy". Syracuse University. Archived from the original on 7 September 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2007.
- ^ Karen Abbott (7 August 2012). "The 1904 Olympic Marathon May Have Been the Strangest Ever". Smithsonian Magazine.
- ^ Parezo, N. J. (2008). p. 59.
- ^ Brownell, Susan, ed. (2008). p. 29.
- ^ Parezo, N. J. (2008). p. 84.
- ^ Brownell, Susan, ed. (2008). p. 34.
- ^ a b Brownell 2008, p. 3.
- ^ a b Brownell 2008, p. 43.
- ^ Parezo 2008, p. 84.
- ^ Brownell 2008, p. 34.
- ^ Parezo 2008, p. 59.
- ^ Hemley, Robin (14 November 2014). "Claire Prentice's 'Lost Tribe of Coney Island'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 February 2023.
- ^ Edinburgh City Libraries (25 August 2015). "Saughton's glorious summer of 1908". Tales of One City. Archived from the original on 12 May 2019. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
- ^ "Saughton Park". Gazetteer for Scotland. Archived from the original on 7 June 2020. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
- ^ Freeman, Sarah (12 June 2015). "Portobello, 99 ice creams, and Britains's last seaside heritage: the sweet taste of success". The Independent. Archived from the original on 8 June 2020. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
- ^ "1910 Somali Village, Edinburgh Marine Gardens, Portobello". Human Zoos. Archived from the original on 8 June 2020. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
- ^ Paul A. Rees, An Introduction to Zoo Biology and Management, Wiley-Blackwell, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester (West Sussex), 2011, p. 44. ISBN 978-1405193498
- ^ "'Human Zoos' go on show in Paris – The Local France, 29/11/2011". The Local France. 29 November 2011. Archived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 17 November 2021.
- ^ "Sally Rand – The Music Box and Sally Rand Nude Ranch at Treasure Island – 1939". sfmuseum.org. Archived from the original on 28 February 2006. Retrieved 7 August 2020.
- ^ "Human zoos: When people were the exhibits". Deutsche Welle. 3 October 2017. Archived from the original on 7 September 2021. Retrieved 2 December 2020.
- ^ a b c "'You Better Go Back to Africa'| Interview." "You Better Go Back to Africa"| Interview, DW English, 18 June 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=baGXUsOKBcU.
- ^ Destined to Witness, pgs. 24-25
- ^ Martins, Rui (21 June 2020). "Qual é a história do Jardim Botânico Tropical de Belém?". Casa das Aranhas. Archived from the original on 12 July 2021. Retrieved 12 July 2021.
- ^ (in French) Cobelco. Belgium human zoo; "Peut-on exposer des Pygmées? [link broken]". Le Soir. 27 July 2002. Archived from the original on 8 February 2005.
- ^ (in English) "Belgium comes to terms with 'human zoos' of its colonial past". The Guardian. 16 April 2018. Archived from the original on 17 April 2023. Retrieved 31 August 2023.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link); "Belgium comes to terms with 'human zoos' of its colonial past". The Guardian. 16 April 2018. Archived from the original on 17 April 2023. - ^ (in English) The human zoo of Tervuren (1897); "The human zoo of Tervuren (1897)". Royal Museum for Central Africa. 15 September 2020. Archived from the original on 9 May 2023.
- ^ Stanard, Matthew (April 2005). "'Bilan du monde pour un monde plus déshumanisé': The 1958 Brussels World's Fair and Belgian Perceptions of the Congo". European History Quarterly. 35 (2): 267–298. doi:10.1177/0265691405051467. ISSN 0265-6914. S2CID 143002285.
- ^ Barlet, Olivier and Blanchard, Pascal, "Le retour des zoos humains" Archived 22 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine, abridged in "Les zoos humains sont-ils de retour?", Le Monde, 28 June 2005. (French)
- ^ (in English and French) "Vers un nouveau zoo humain en Allemagne? (original text in English below the French translation)". Indymedia. 6 December 2005. Archived from the original on 19 March 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2006.; "England Hacks Away at the Shaken EU". Der Spiegel. 6 June 2005.; "A Different View of the Human Zoo". Der Spiegel. 13 June 2005.; "Zoo sparks row over 'tribesmen' props for animals, by Allan Hall". The Scotsman. 8 June 2005. Archived from the original on 9 December 2006. Retrieved 21 January 2006.; Critical analysis of the Augsburg human zoo Archived 4 January 2006 at the Wayback Machine ("Organizers and visitors were not racist but they participated in and reflected a process that has been called racialization: the daily and often taken-for-granted means by which humans are separated into supposedly biologically based and unequal categories", etc.)
- ^ Schiller, Nina Glick; Dea, Data; Höhne, Markus (4 July 2005). "African Culture and the Zoo in the 21st Century: The "African Village" in the Augsburg Zoo and Its Wider Implications" (PDF). Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 January 2006.
- ^ London Zoo official website Archived 16 January 2006 at the Wayback Machine;"Humans strip bare for zoo exhibit". BBC News. 25 August 2005. Archived from the original on 11 February 2007. Retrieved 5 January 2010.;"Humans On Display At London's Zoo". CBS News. 26 August 2005. Archived from the original on 12 November 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2006.;"The human zoo? by Debra Saunders (a bit more critical)". Townhall. 1 September 2005. Archived from the original on 25 October 2014. Retrieved 8 August 2006.
- ^ "Humans on display at Adelaide Zoo". tvnz. 12 January 2007. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014.
- ^ O'Mahony, John (11 August 2014). "Edinburgh's most controversial show: Exhibit B, a human zoo". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 7 June 2020. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
- ^ "ACHAC's 'Human Zoos' Exhibition: Scottish University Tour". French at Stirling. 14 June 2018. Archived from the original on 7 June 2020. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
Films
edit- The Couple in the Cage. 1997. Dir. Coco Fusco and Paula Eredia. 30 min.
- Régis Warnier, the film Man to Man. 2005.
- "From Bella Coola to Berlin". 2006. Dir. Barbara Hager. 48 minutes. Broadcaster – Bravo! Canada.
- "Indianer in Berlin: Hagenbeck's Volkerschau". 2006. Dir. Barbara Hager. Broadcaster – Discovery Germany Geschichte Channel.
- Alexander C. T. Geppert, Fleeting Cities. Imperial Expositions in Fin-de-Siècle Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
- Sadiah Qureshi, Peoples on Parade: Exhibitions, Empire and Anthropology in Nineteenth-Century Britain (2011).
- "Human zoos. The invention of the savage" Archived 18 June 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Dir. Pascal Blanchard, Gilles Boëtsch, Nanette Jacomijn Snoep – exhibition catalogue – Actes Sud (2011)
- Sauvages. Au cœur des zoos humains, Dir. Pascal Blanchard, Bruno Victor-Pujebet – 90 minutes – Bonne Pioche production & Archipel (2018)
- Human Zoos: America's Forgotten History of Scientific Racism, Dir. John G. West (2019)
Bibliography
edit- Ankerl, Guy. Coexisting Contemporary Civilizations: Arabo-Muslim, Bharatai, Chinese, and Western, Geneva, INU Press, 2000, ISBN 2881550045.
- Conklin, Alice L., and Ian Christopher Fletcher. European Imperialism, 1830–1930: Climax and Contradiction. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 1999. ISBN 0395903858
- Dreesbach, Anne. Colonial Exhibitions:'Völkerschauen' and the Display of the 'Other', European History Online, Mainz: Institute of European History, 2012.
- Grant, Kevin. A Civilised Savagery: Britain and the New Slaveries in Africa, 1884–1926. New York; Oxfordshire, England: Routledge, 2005.
- Lewis, R. Barry. Understanding humans : introduction to physical anthropology and archaeology. Belmont, Calif. Wadsworth Cengage Learning. 2010.
- Oliveira, Cinthya. Human Rights & Exhibitions, 1789–1989, Journal of Museum Ethnography, no. 29, 2016, pp. 71–94.
- Penny, H. Glenn. Objects of Culture : Ethnology and Ethnographic Museums in Imperial Germany, The University of North Carolina Press, 2002.
- Porter, Louis, Porter, A. N., and Louis, William Roger. The Oxford History of the British Empire. Volume III, The Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999. Oxford History of the British Empire. Web.
- Qureshi, Sadiah. Robert Gordon Latham, Displayed Peoples, and the Natural History of Race: 1854–1866, The Historical Journal, vol. 54, no. 1, 2011, pp. 143–166.
- Rothfels, Nigel. Savages and Beasts : The Birth of the Modern Zoo, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.
- Schofield, Hugh. Human Zoos: When Real People Were Exhibits, BBC News, 2011.
- India Andaman Jarawa Tribe in 'Shocking' Tourist Video, BBC News, 2012.
External links
edit- Media related to Human zoos at Wikimedia Commons
- Human Zoos. The Invention of the Savage
- Human Zoos website
- Pascal Blanchard; Sandrine Lemaire; Nicolas Bancel (August 2000). "Human zoos – Racist theme parks for Europe's colonialists". Le Monde diplomatique.;
- "On A Neglected Aspect Of Western Racism", by Kurt Jonassohn, December 2000
- The Colonial Exposition of May 1931 Archived 15 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine by Michael Vann
- "Official site of the Adelaide Human Zoo"
- Qureshi, Sadiah (2004), 'Displaying Sara Baartman, the 'Hottentot Venus', History of Science 42:233–257. Available online at Science History Publications.