Wikipedia

Operation Hailstone

(Redirected from Operation Hailstorm)

Operation Hailstone was a massive United States Navy air and surface attack on Truk Lagoon on 17–18 February 1944, conducted as part of the American offensive drive against the Imperial Japanese Navy in the Pacific Ocean theatre.

Operation Hailstone
Part of the Gilbert and Marshall Islands campaign

Japanese ships burning off Dublon Island.
Date17–18 February 1944 (1944-02-17 – 1944-02-18)
Location
Truk Lagoon, Caroline Islands
7°20′21″N 151°53′05″E / 7.3393°N 151.8846°E / 7.3393; 151.8846
Result American victory
Belligerents
 United States  Japan
Commanders and leaders
Marc Mitscher Masami Kobayashi
Strength
  • 5 fleet carriers
  • 4 light carriers
  • 6 battleships
  • 10 cruisers
  • 28 destroyers
  • 10 submarines
  • 560 aircraft
  • 5 cruisers
  • 8 destroyers
  • 5 other warships
  • 50 merchant ships
  • 350 planes
Casualties and losses
  • 40 killed[nb 1]
  • 1 fleet carrier damaged
  • 1 battleship slightly damaged
  • 25 aircraft destroyed
  • 4,500+ killed
  • 2 light cruisers sunk
  • 4 destroyers sunk
  • 3 auxiliary cruisers sunk
  • 6 auxiliary ships sunk
  • 32 merchant ships sunk
  • 9 vessels damaged
  • 250+ aircraft destroyed

Background

edit
 
The Caroline Islands

The Japanese occupied Micronesia, including the Caroline Islands, in 1914 and established Truk as a base as early as 1939. The lagoon was first built up to house the Imperial Japanese Navy's 4th Fleet, its "South Seas Force". After the outbreak of war with the United States, the 4th Fleet was put under the command of the Combined Fleet, which continued to use Truk as a forward operating base into 1944. In addition to anchorages for warships and port facilities for shipping between the home islands and the Southern Resources Area, five airfields and a seaplane base were constructed at Truk, making it the only major Japanese airfield within flying range of the Marshall Islands.[2]

Despite the impressions of U.S. Navy leaders and the American public concerning Truk's projected fortifications, the base was never significantly reinforced or protected against land attack. However, the development of Truk began in earnest in late 1943, with defensive measures being taken against a potential U.S. invasion. Airfields were extended and shore batteries were erected.[3]

Because aircraft stationed at Truk could potentially interfere with the upcoming invasion of Eniwetok, and because Truk had recently served as a ferry point for the resupply of aircraft to Rabaul, Admiral Raymond Spruance ordered Vice Admiral Marc Mitscher's Fast Carrier Task Force, designated TF 58, to carry out air raids against Truk. Three of TF 58's four carrier task groups were committed to the operation. Their total strength consisted of five fleet carriers (Enterprise, Yorktown, Essex, Intrepid, and Bunker Hill) and four light carriers (Belleau Wood, Cabot, Monterey, and Cowpens), carrying more than 500 warplanes. Supporting these aircraft carriers was a task force of seven battleships and numerous heavy cruisers, light cruisers, destroyers, and submarines.[4]

The Japanese, meanwhile, understood the weakness of their position at Truk. The IJN had begun withdrawing fleet units from its anchorages as early as October 1943. The effective abandonment of Truk as a forward operating base accelerated during the first week of February 1944, following Japanese sightings of U.S. Marine Corps PB4Y-1 Liberator reconnaissance planes sent to reconnoiter the area.[5]

Battle

edit

Air attacks

edit
1944 U.S. newsreel describing the attack

The three carrier task groups committed to Hailstone moved into position and began launching their first fighter sweep 90 minutes before daybreak on 17 February 1944. No Japanese air patrol was active at the time, as the IJN's 22nd and 26th Air Flotillas were enjoying shore leave after weeks on high alert following the Liberator sightings.[6] Similarly problematic for the Japanese, radar on Truk was not capable of detecting low-flying planes—a weakness probably known and exploited by Allied intelligence organizations. Because of these factors, U.S. carrier aircraft achieved total surprise.[7]

Japanese pilots scrambled into their cockpits just minutes before TF 58 planes arrived over Eten, Param, Moen, and Dublon Islands. Though more than 300 Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service (IJNAS) and Imperial Japanese Army Air Service (IJAAS) planes were present at Truk on the first day of attacks, only about half of them were operational compared with over 500 operational aircraft among the carriers of TF 58. U.S. Navy fighter pilots in their Grumman F6F Hellcats, with the advantages of speed, altitude, armor, and surprise, achieved a one-sided victory against IJNAS pilots flying the outdated Mitsubishi A6M Zero. As many as 30 of the 80 Zeros sent up in response to the fighter sweep were shot down, compared with four Hellcats reported lost. Only token aerial resistance was encountered for the rest of the morning; almost no Japanese aircraft were present by the afternoon.[8][4]

Due to the lack of air cover or warning, many merchant ships were caught at anchor with only the islands' anti-aircraft guns for defense against the U.S. carrier planes. Some vessels outside the lagoon already steaming towards Japan were attacked by U.S. submarines and sunk before they could make their escape. Still others, attempting to flee via the atoll's North Pass, were bottled up by aerial attack and by Admiral Spruance's surface force, Task Group 50.9, which circumnavigated Truk, bombarding shore positions and engaging enemy ships.[9]

Torpedo bomber and dive bomber squadrons from the carrier air groups (CAGs) were responsible for the bulk of the damage inflicted on Japanese ground facilities. Early on the first day of Hailstone, Grumman TBF Avenger torpedo bomber squadrons from Enterprise's Carrier Air Group 10 (CAG-10) and Intrepid's CAG-6 dropped fragmentation and incendiary bombs on runways at Eten Island and the seaplane base on Moen Island. Dozens of aircraft were damaged or destroyed, further blunting any possible response by the Japanese to the strikes. Subsequent joint attacks by dive bombers[nb 2] and Avenger torpedo bombers cratered runways and destroyed hangar facilities.[11][12]

Morning strikes were also launched against shipping targets in the lagoon. Lieutenant Commander James D. Ramage, commanding officer of Dive Bombing Squadron 10 (VB-10), is credited with sinking the previously damaged merchant tanker Hoyo Maru.[13] Lieutenant James E. Bridges and his crew in one of Intrepid's Torpedo Squadron 6 (VT-6) Avengers scored a direct hit on the ammunition ship Aikoku Maru. The bomb blast set off a tremendous explosion which immediately sank the ship and apparently engulfed the plane as well, killing all three men inside.[14]

 
Japanese ammunition ship Aikoku Maru exploding after a torpedo hit, 17 February 1944.

By the second and third shipping strikes of the day, CAG action reports listed the apparent enemy mission as "escape".[15] Those ships able to make for open sea steamed for the North Pass exit from the lagoon while weathering repeated aerial attacks. One particular group of warships – cruiser Katori, auxiliary cruiser Akagi Maru, destroyers Maikaze and Nowaki, and minesweeper Shonan Maru – was given special attention by carrier bombers. Multiple air groups attacked these ships, inflicting serious damage. Yorktown's dive- and torpedo-bombing squadrons claimed two hits on Katori and hits on another cruiser and multiple destroyers; Essex bombers claimed five hits on a Katori-class cruiser, stating that the ship was stopped dead in the water after the attack.[16][17] Akagi Maru was sunk by air attacks.[18]

Surface action

edit

At this point, reports reached Admiral Spruance concerning the group of warships fleeing through North Pass. Spruance was so adamant on engaging in ship-to-ship combat that his carrier commander, Admiral Mitscher, ordered his CAGs to stop attacking Katori and her companions. Spruance put himself in tactical command of Task Group 50.9, made up of four destroyers, heavy cruisers Minneapolis and New Orleans, and the new battleships Iowa and New Jersey, which he personally led in a surface engagement against the previously damaged Japanese ships.[19] The battered Japanese ships did not stand much of a chance against Task Group 50.9, though members of his staff saw Spruance's decision to engage in surface action when aircraft likely could have achieved similar results as needlessly reckless. Indeed, the Japanese destroyer Maikaze managed to fire torpedoes at the battleship New Jersey during the engagement. Fortunately for Spruance, the torpedoes missed, and the "battle" ended with predictably one-sided results. The U.S. Navy surface combatants incurred virtually no damage, and it was the only time in their careers that Iowa and New Jersey had fired their main armament at enemy ships.

Meanwhile, New Jersey's 5-inch (127 mm) guns combined fire with U.S. cruisers to sink Maikaze and Shonan Maru, while Iowa targeted and sank Katori with numerous hits from her main battery. Nowaki was the only Japanese ship from this group to escape, only suffering very minor damage at the hand of a straddle from a High Capacity 16-inch (406 mm) round from New Jersey.[20]

Japanese night raid

edit

Retaliation for the day's strikes arrived late at night in the form of small groups of Japanese bombers probing the task groups' defenses. From roughly 21:00 on 17 February to just minutes past midnight on 18 February, at least five groups of between one and three enemy planes attempted to sneak past screening ships to strike at the fleet carriers. One such plane, a Nakajima B5N2 "Kate" bomber, managed to evade night fighter planes protecting the U.S. task force and dropped its torpedo on Task Group 58.2. The torpedo struck Intrepid on the starboard quarter of the ship, damaging steering control and killing 11 sailors. Intrepid was forced to retire to the U.S. for repairs and did not return to combat until August 1944.[21][22]

Aftermath

edit

The attacks on Truk was often described as the Americans' payback for the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, although American carrier aircrews were disappointed that major Japanese surface warships were absent as they had been withdrawn prior to the raid.[23][24][25][26][27] Nonetheless, losses at Truk were severe. Some 17,000 tons of stored fuel were destroyed by the strikes.[28] Shipping losses totaled almost 200,000 tons, including precious resources in fleet oilers.[29] This represented almost one-tenth of total Japanese shipping losses between 1 November 1943 and 30 June 1944.[30]

Truk, like so many other Japanese bases, was left to itself without hope of resupply or reinforcement. Army forces which had arrived at the atoll before the U.S. attacks put increasing strain on available foodstuffs and medical supplies. Dwindling ammunition even limited the ability of shore batteries to fend off intermittent attacks by Allied forces, including experimental raids by Boeing B-29 Superfortresses and attacks by Allied carrier aircraft.[31]

Moreover, the isolation of this whole area of operations by submarine and air attack began the effective severance of Japanese shipping lanes between empire waters and critical fuel supplies to the south. The ultimate effect of such a disconnect was later seen during the Battle of Leyte Gulf, when IJN forces had to sortie separately from Japan and Lingga Roads because of fuel constraints.[32] The neutralization of Truk and the seizure of Eniwetok paved the way for the upcoming invasion of Saipan, which for the first time put U.S. land-based heavy bombers within range of the Japanese home islands.[33]

Japan started to rebuild Truk as a bomber air base and increased its anti-aircraft defenses. Spruance sent in carrier planes again on 29 April and destroyed the defenses and bombers parked at airports. British forces attacked again in June 1945. No significant naval buildup occurred at Truk after Operation Hailstone.[citation needed]

Truk is renowned today as a tourist destination for divers interested in seeing the many shipwrecks left in the lagoon, many of which were sunk in Operation Hailstone.[34]

List of ships in Truk at the time of attack

edit

Warships

edit

List derived from Jeffery's War Graves, Munition Dumps and Pleasure Grounds (2007)[35]

Sunk

edit
  • Cruiser (CL)
    • Katori (香取) 5,800 tons
    • Naka (那珂) 5,195 tons
  • Destroyer (DD)
    • 1 modern
      • Maikaze (舞風) 陽炎型 2,000 tons
    • 3 obsolescent
      • Fumizuki (文月) 睦月型 1,320 tons
      • Oite (追風) 神風型 1,270 tons
      • Tachikaze (太刀風) 峯風型 1,215 tons
  • Submarine chaser
  • Auxiliary submarine chaser Shonan Maru #15 (第15昭南丸), 355 tons
  • Motor torpedo boat #10, 85 tons

Damaged

edit
  • Repair ship Akashi (明石) 10,500 tons
  • Seaplane tender Akitsushima (秋津洲) 4,650 tons
  • Destroyer (DD)
  • Submarine
  • Submarine chaser CHa-20
  • Target ship Hakachi (波勝) 1,641 tons

Merchant ships

edit

List derived from Jeffery's War Graves, Munition Dumps and Pleasure Grounds (2007)[35]

Sunk

edit
  • Auxiliary cruiser
    • Aikoku Maru (愛国丸) 10,348 tons
    • Akagi Maru (赤城丸) 7,367 tons
    • Kiyosumi Maru (清澄丸) 6,983 tons
  • Navy transport
    • Hoki Maru (伯耆丸) 7,112 tons
    • Yamagiri Maru (山霧丸) 7,112 tons
    • Fujikawa Maru (富士川丸) 6,938 tons
    • Navy transport/freighter San Francisco Maru (桑港丸) 5,831 tons
    • Reiyo Maru (麗洋丸) 5,446 tons
    • Seiko Maru (西江丸)? 5,385 tons
    • passenger/cargo ship Kensho Maru (乾祥丸) 4,862 tons
    • freighter Hanakawa Maru (花川丸) 4,739 tons
    • passenger/cargo ship Sankisan Maru or Yamakisan Maru (山鬼山丸) 4,776 tons
    • freighter Hokuyo Maru (北洋丸) 4,217 tons
    • freighter Momokawa Maru (桃川丸) 3,829 tons
    • Navy water carrier/passenger/cargo ship Nippo Maru (日豊丸) 3,764 tons
    • freighter Unkai Maru #6(第六雲海丸) 3,220 tons
    • Taiho Maru (大邦丸) 2,827 tons
    • freighter Shotan Maru (松丹丸) 1,999 tons
    • freighter Gosei Maru (五星丸) 1,931 tons
  • Freighter Taikichi Maru or Tachi Maru (泰吉丸) 1,891 tons
  • Army transport
    • Gyoten Maru (暁天丸) 6,854 tons
    • freighter Nagano Maru (長野丸) 3,824 tons
    • Yubae Maru (夕映丸) 3,217 tons
  • Submarine tender
    • Heian Maru (平安丸) 11,614 tons
    • Rio de Janeiro Maru (リオデジャネイロ丸) 9,626 tons
  • Oiler
    • Fleet oiler Shinkoku Maru (神国丸) 10,020 tons
    • Oil tanker Fujisan Maru (富士山丸) 9,524 tons
  • Auxiliary oil tanker
    • whaler Tonan Maru #3 (第三図南丸) 19,209 tons
    • Houyou Maru or Hoyo Maru (宝洋丸) 8,691 tons
    • passenger/cargo ship Amagisan Maru (天城山丸) 7,620 tons

Damaged

edit
  • Cargo ship Sōya (宗谷) 3,800 tons

See also

edit

Footnotes

edit
  1. ^ Deaths included 29 aircrew from assorted carriers plus 11 sailors aboard Intrepid. Aircraft losses included 12 fighters, seven torpedo-bombers, and 6 dive-bombers.[1]
  2. ^ All dive bomber squadrons with the exception of Bunker Hill's VB-17 flew the Douglas SBD Dauntless at this time. VB-17 was the first squadron to use the newer Curtiss SB2C Helldiver, which later replaced the Dauntless as the US Navy's standard dive bomber.[10]

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Morison 1961, p. 330
  2. ^ Jeffery 2003.
  3. ^ Toll 2015, pp. 404–405.
  4. ^ a b Rems 2014.
  5. ^ Prados 1995, pp. 533–535.
  6. ^ Hornfischer 2016, pp. 6–7.
  7. ^ Prados 1995, p. 537.
  8. ^ Toll 2015, pp. 405–406.
  9. ^ Prados 1995, pp. 537–538.
  10. ^ Tillman 1997, pp. 16–17, 31
  11. ^ Gardner 1944.
  12. ^ Harrison 1944.
  13. ^ Toll 2015, p. 407.
  14. ^ Astor 2007, pp. 233–234.
  15. ^ Jeter 1944, p. 15.
  16. ^ Stebbins 1944, p. 3.
  17. ^ White 1944, pp. 85–98.
  18. ^ "H-026-3 Truk Raid 1944". NHHC. Retrieved 20 March 2023.
  19. ^ Toll 2015, pp. 410–411.
  20. ^ "Full History - USS New Jersey, The World's Greatest Battleship". Battleship New Jersey. 28 March 2024. Retrieved 28 March 2024.
  21. ^ Sprague 1944, pp. 14–15.
  22. ^ Williams 2000.
  23. ^ https://www.sharkbayfilms.co.uk/1803-2/
  24. ^ https://masterliveaboards.com/the-history-behind-operation-hailstone/
  25. ^ https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/operation-hailstone-devastated-the-japanese-anchorage-at-truk/
  26. ^ https://bukowo.com/2019/02/17/operation-hailstone-the-raid-on-truk-the-japanese-pearl-harbor/
  27. ^ https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/1994/february/hail-storm-truk
  28. ^ Hornfischer 2016, p. 18.
  29. ^ Toll 2015, pp. 413–414.
  30. ^ Wilmott 2005, p. 292.
  31. ^ Prados 1995, p. 538.
  32. ^ Prados 2016, pp. 110–111.
  33. ^ Ofstie 1946, pp. 194–195.
  34. ^ Trumbull 1972.
  35. ^ a b Jeffery 2007, pp. Appendix 4.

References

edit

Primary sources

edit

Further reading

edit
  • Bailey, Dan E. (1992). World War II: Wrecks of the Kwajalein and Truk Lagoons. North Valley Diver Publications. ISBN 0-911615-05-9.
  • Brown, David (1990). Warship Losses of World War Two. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-914-X.
  • Brown, Herbert C. (2000). Hell at Tassafaronga. Ancient Mariners Pr. ISBN 0-9700721-4-7.-Firsthand account of Operation Hailstone by a crewmember of USS New Orleans.
  • Cressman, Robert J. (2000). The Official Chronology of the U.S. Navy in World War II. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-149-1.
  • Ito, Masanori (1986). The End of the Imperial Japanese Navy (reissue ed.). Jove. ISBN 0-515-08682-7.
  • Lacroix, Eric; Linton Wells (1997). Japanese Cruisers of the Pacific War. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-311-3.
  • Lindemann, Klaus (2005). Hailstorm Over Truk Lagoon: Operations Against Truk by Carrier Task Force 58, 17 and 18 February 1944, and the Shipwrecks of World War II. Oregon: Resource Publications. ISBN 1-59752-347-X.
  • Peattie, Mark (1992). Nan'Yo: The Rise and Fall of the Japanese in Micronesia, 1885–1945 (Pacific Islands Monograph Series). University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 0-8248-1480-0.
  • Stafford, Edward P. (2002). The Big E: The Story of the USS Enterprise (reissue ed.). Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-998-0.
  • Stewart, William Herman (1986). Ghost Fleet of the Truk Lagoon: An Account of "Operation Hailstone", February, 1944. Pictorial Histories. ISBN 0-933126-66-2.
  • Wright III, Burton. Eastern Mandates. The U.S. Army Campaigns in World War II. United States Army Center of Military History. Archived from the original on 22 September 2013. Retrieved 20 August 2010.
  • United States Strategic Bombing Survey (1947). The Reduction of Truk. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. OCLC 44738732.
  • Young, Edward M. (2015). "A Hard Rain: Operation Hailstone: The US Navy Raid on Truk Lagoon, February 17–18, 1944". The Aviation Historian (13): 76–89. ISSN 2051-1930.
  • Zolandez, Thomas (2006). "Question 12/03: Japanese Facilities at Truk Lagoon". Warship International. XLIII (2): 152–153. ISSN 0043-0374.

Video

edit
  • Quest for Sunken Warships: "Operation Hailstone", 2007, documentary, Military Channel
edit
 
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Operation Hailstone.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Hailstone&oldid=1261323653"