Wikipedia

Bridge strike

(Redirected from Overheight detection system)

Bridge strike or tunnel strike (also known as bridge bashing) is a type of transport accident in which a vehicle collides with a bridge, overpass, or tunnel structure. Bridge-strike road accidents, in which an over-height vehicle collides with the underside of the structure, occur frequently and are a major issue worldwide. In waterways, the term encompasses water vessel–bridge collisions, including bridge span and support structure collisions.

Bridge strike in Brisbane

Impacts

edit

In United Kingdom, railway bridge strikes (called "bridge bashing"[1]) happen on an average of once every four and a half hours, with total of 1789 times in 2019. Several bridges have been hit over 20 times in a single year. The total cost borne by the state was around £23 million.[2][3] In Beijing, China, 20% of all bridge damages are caused by bridge strikes. Texas Department of Transportation estimated in 2013 that an average cost to repair a bridge strike is $180,000 USD.[2]

Even without damages to the bridges, the strikes can result in significant damages to the vehicles. There are many examples of buses that have their roofs got completely cut off by bridge strikes, such as strikes in Birkenhead in 2014,[4] Long Island in 2018,[5] and Glasgow in 2023.[6] Local communities also incur costs related to strikes without bridge damages. These include economic impacts due to road closures, and police response and cleanup costs.[7][8] From 2021 to 2022, Network Rail lost £12 million in train delay and cancellation fees.[9]

 
Stabilizing frame installed as a temporary repair of a bridge strike[10]

The severity of damage to bridges caused by strikes can vary depending on the type of impact and the differences in damage resistance among bridges.[11] Some of them are not structural damages and only minor repairs are required.[12] Some major structural damages require extensive repairs, for example, an overpass strike in Nashville in 2018 caused a structural beam to be twisted, resulting in repair cost of nearly one million US dollars.[13] Repairs of structural damages can be long and complicated process. In order to allow traffic to get moving as soon as possible, officials may need to implement emergency repairs before permanent repair solutions can be implemented. For example, a bridge strike in York County, Pennsylvania in 2022 required a large temporary stabilizing frame to be added to the top of the bridge.[10] After the second strike on the same spot six months later, the permanent repair was further delayed and the estimate costs of the permanent repair increased to $1.5 million USD.[14]

 
I-5 Skagit River bridge collapsed

A single bridge strike may result in a catastrophic bridge damage. An example of that is the I-5 Skagit River bridge collapse. The collapse was caused by a truck with an oversize load that was taller than the clearance above of the bridge. The bridge was a steel through-truss bridge with a "fracture-critical" design that has non-redundant load-bearing beams. An impact of the oversize load to multiple sway braces was enough to damage load-bearing members and caused a span to be collapsed, resulting in vehicles falling down to the river with three minor injuries.[15]

Beyond damages and economic impacts, bridge strikes can result in serious injuries and fatalities. In 1994, five passengers of a double-decker bus were killed by a low-bridge strike in Glasgow.[16] In 2010, a rail bridge strike of a double-decker bus on a New York parkway killed 4 passengers. In the United States, 13 people died in bridge strike accidents between 2014 and 2018.[13] In 2022, a truck carrying liquified petroleum gas scraped the underside of a low bridge in Boksburg, South Africa, causing an explosion that killed at least 8 people.[17]

Mitigations

edit

Warning signs

edit

Some countries have standards on minimum vertical clearance of roadway. Any structures that do not meet that clearance would need to have warning signs. The United Kingdom has a standard on minimum clearance of a public highway at 16 feet 6 inches (5.03 m). Any bridges that do not meet the clearance requirement are considered to be "low bridges" and they require to have signage to indicate the clearance.[18]

In United States, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices requires the placement of warning signs for any structure with vertical clearance less than 12 inches (30 cm) more than the legal maximum vehicle height. Warning signs installed on the structure can use either diamond or rectangle shapes, while advanced warning signs, must be diamonds.[19] States, not the federal government, set maximum vehicle heights. The most common maximum, used by 32 eastern states, is 13 feet 6 inches (4.11 m). This effectively sets a requirement for signage at structures in those states lower than 14 feet 6 inches (4.42 m). Higher legal maximum vehicle height limits used in other states.[20][21]

There is a variety of shapes, colors and designs used for low clearance and height limit warning signs, indication signs, and prohibition signs used worldwide.

In United Kingdom, there is an emphasis on making low clearance structures be more noticeable to drivers. This includes having large "LOW BRIDGE" letters and hazard marking on the low bridges. It has various warning signs including warning signs at or near the structures, advanced warning signs, and road markings. For advanced warning signs, there can be large panel with alternative route information.[18] Similarly in Australia, advanced traffic instruction signs are used to provide clearance information of a low-clearance bridge ahead and accompanied by a detour direction.[22][23]

  • Warning signs
  •  
    Low clearance warning sign that is hard to see
  •  
    Large "low bridge" sign with hazard marking on the bridge
  •  
    Low clearance advanced warning sign
  •  
    Advanced warning with alternative route information

Passive devices

edit

Speed limits along with road narrowing, speed bumps, rumble strip or other traffic calming techniques can be used to force reducing vehicle speeds to prevent bridge strikes.[2]

Tattle tales are series of chains suspended from an overhead gantry over the roadway. The gantry is also equipped with warning signs and other markings. The chain are set to the clearances of the approaching low-clearance structures. When any parts of vehicles hit the chains, it creates noises to notify drivers so they can pay attention to the height restriction signs.[24][25] Sometime a bar is hung at the bottom of the chains to make it more noticeable to drivers.[26] This type of devices only works in low speeds. High speed vehicles can run through without giving out enough noticeable noises to the drivers.[2]

In special situations where the clearance of a structure is reduced longitudinally, the beginning part of the structure may give an appearance that it provides enough clearance for vehicles to go through. As the vehicles are driven under it, the clearance is reduced. The vehicles may be wedged and stuck under the structure as it is too late for drivers to realize that it is not enough clearance to go all the way through. In this case, false soffits can be added to the beginning part of the structure. The false soffits are flaps that extend down from the underside of the structure to match the lowest clearance of the entire structure to provide visual aid to drivers of the actual clearance that they will be facing. There can be hazard markings on the false soffits to make them highly visible.[18]

Other devices include scarifying structures. These structures are installed in front of the bridges or tunnels with the heights of the clearance to absorb the impacts of overheight vehicles. The primary goal of using scarifying structures is to prevent damage to the bridge and tunnel structures.[2] Height restriction bars can be installed ahead of the structure to ensure that overheight vehicles will not be able to approach the low-clearance structure.[27] Collision protection beams are installed right in front or at the structures. They take the impacts and dissipate the energy from bridge strikes to prevent damages to the structures.[18][28] As the goal of these devices are to protect the structures, they are used as the last resort without providing any benefits to crash prevention. Without other devices, risks to vehicles still hold.[2] In 2019, a bus crashed onto a height restriction bar in Dubai, resulting in several fatalities.[29]

  • Passive devices
  •  
    Tattle tales to warn of an approaching low bridge
  •  
    False soffit to match the lower clearance ahead
  •  
    Height restriction bar in front of this covered bridge
  •  
    Collision prevention beam installed in front of this bridge

Overheight vehicle detection systems

edit
 
Warning sign with yellow flashing lights can be triggered by an overheight vehicle detection.

Overheight detectors integrated with flashing lights and other warning signs are used to in some locations to provide an active warning to the drivers of the vehicles that are over the height restrictions of the upcoming bridges or tunnels.[22] Despite the yellow flashing lights, this method may still fail to gain attention of the drivers. The infamous Norfolk Southern–Gregson Street Overpass (also known as the 11-foot-8 Bridge) had 100 crashes on record between 2008 and 2016 even with this type of systems.[30][31] An improvement to this is to have the detectors fully integrated with traffic lights to stop all traffic when an overheight vehicle is detected.[30]

 
Police officer measures truck's height after the red traffic light is triggered to stop all traffic.

Fully integrated systems of overheight detectors and traffic lights have been used in tunnel operations for decades. By the 1970s, several tunnels in the United States had such systems in place.[26] An example was a systems at the Hampton Roads Bridge–Tunnel which had two detection points. The first point provided an audible and visual warnings to drivers to pull over to an inspection station. The vehicle would be measured by an authority before allowing to proceed. In an event that an overheight vehicle failed to stop at the inspection station, the secondary detector would trigger another alarm that would display a message at variable-message signs to lower the speed limit and eventually turned the red light to stop all traffic.[32] Most detectors in the 70s used photocell system with light source installed on one pole and a photocell detector installed on opposite side of the roadway. A major drawback of the photocell detectors was that they produced a lot of false alarms caused by snow and heavy rain. Another type of detectors at the time included trip wires that would be broken if an object at that height hit the wire.[26]

Modern detectors now use other technologies such as red/infrared photoelectric sensors, infrared laser beams, and ultrasonic transducer. Some are dual-beam systems to increase reliability by allowing the system to function even with single beam, and to lower false alarms by rejecting birds and other materials. More sophisticated systems include camera systems that can capture 3D profiles of vehicles in realtime, and microwave radar systems that can capture vehicle height profiles.[33][2] Contact-based detection systems are also in use such as low-clearance detection bars that are movable vertically to initiate a trigger.[33]

In case of overheight vehicle detection systems that are fully integrated with traffic light control systems but unmanned, there is no personnel available to perform measurements and direct overheight vehicles away from the bridges. The lights will turn green after a short stop with an expectation that the drivers will notice the height restrictions and use an alternative route by themselves. Some drivers still do not think that the warnings are applicable to them and proceed to crash into the bridges after the lights turn to green.[34]

In United Kingdom, a more advanced system that targets a specific vehicle was deployed at Blackwall Tunnel. An advanced overheight detection system is installed 1.6-kilometre (0.99 mi) ahead of the tunnel. It is equipped with automatic number-plate recognition that reads off the plate number and sends that over to variable-message signs to instruct the vehicle with that particular plate number to divert to the provided alternative route. The system reduced tunnel strikes by 38%. In Australia, a water curtain falling on all traffic lanes with a laser projection of a large stop sign in front of the Sydney Harbour Tunnel is used as the last resort to stop overheight vehicles that ignore all the warning signs and traffic lights.[35]

Onboard systems

edit

There are several systems that can be equipped in trucks or other commercial vehicles to provide bridge strike prevention. These include specialized truck GPS systems that have clearance information, systems that measure the actual vehicle heights, and onboard sensors that detect upcoming low-clearance structure. More advanced onboard systems can electronically receive warnings from overheight vehicle detection systems. They can apply a brake if drivers fail to react.[33]

Bridges known for strikes

edit
See also: List of bridges known for strikes

A 2.7 m (8 ft 10+1⁄4 in) high overpass bridge near St Petersburg, Russia, is known as the "Bridge of Stupidity" because it is often struck by vehicles despite many warning signs. In May 2018, after it was struck for the 150th time by a GAZelle truck, a birthday cake was presented to the bridge. This made national news.[36][37]

Similarly, the 11 ft 8 in (3.56 m) Norfolk Southern–Gregson Street Overpass, nicknamed "The Can Opener", in Durham, North Carolina, US, was very frequently struck by vehicles, and received international media attention[38] until it was raised in 2019.[39]

Infrared sensors, which trigger warning signs when a high vehicle approaches, were added to an underpass in Frauenfeld, Switzerland, only after several incidents.[40][41]

A similar situation exists at an underpass on Guy Street in Montreal, which has a clearance of 3.75 m (12 ft 4 in).[42][43][44]

Waterways

edit
Main article: Ship collision

In waterways, the term bridge strike may be used when a water vessel collides with a bridge. This may include a collision to the bridge span or a collision to the bridge support structure such as a pier.[45][46][47] Bridge protection systems are used to mitigate the effects of a ship strike.[48]

In 2014, the United States Coast Guard published statistics that it investigated 205 bridge strikes in the eleven years prior to the publication. All of those collisions involved involved a fixed, swing, lift or draw bridge. That number was 1.2% of all vessel collision incidents investigated by the Coast Guard. The primary causal factor was the lack of accurate air draft data, the distance between water surface to the top most part of the vessel.[49]

Aviation

edit

Low-flying aircraft can also collide with bridges. For example, Air Florida Flight 90 crashed into a bridge over the Potomac River just after takeoff.

To prevent controlled flight into terrain, tall bridges may bear aviation obstruction lighting that notifies pilots of their presence.[50]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ "Bridge bash campaign targets Staffordshire lorry drivers". Network Rail. 26 October 2017. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Nguyen, Bella; Brilakis, Ioannis (2016). "Understanding the Problem of Bridge and Tunnel Strikes Caused by Over-height Vehicles". Transportation Research Procedia. 14: 3915–3924. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.481. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
  3. ^ "Wise up size up: Don't try it for size – know your height before you go". Network Rail. Retrieved 31 August 2021.
  4. ^ "Roof of doubledecker bus sliced off in crash in Birkenhead". The Guardian. 7 December 2014. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
  5. ^ Bacon, John. "'This could have been tragic': Dozens injured after overpass rips roof off bus". USA Today. No. 9 April 2018. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
  6. ^ Ferguson, Laura (21 May 2023). "Roof sliced off Glasgow double decker bus in railway bridge crash amid ongoing incident". Glasgow Live. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
  7. ^ Response to a Bridge Strike at a Bridge carrying the Railway over a Road A Protocol for Highway and Road Managers, Police and Bridge Owners (PDF). Network Rail. 26 November 2010. p. 5. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
  8. ^ Floyd, Greg (31 May 2023). "Everytime a vehicle strikes a NY bridge, you're paying for it". WRGB. Retrieved 16 September 2023.
  9. ^ "Most bashed bridges in Britain revealed". Network Rail. 16 November 2022. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  10. ^ a b Maenza, Anthony (6 August 2022). "Permanent repair to Queen Street bridge to begin soon, causing some I-83 closures". York Dispatch. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  11. ^ GROSE, J A (October 1995). "Bridge Strikes: Safety Overkill?". Modern Railways: 640-1. ISSN 0026-8356. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  12. ^ Varine, Patrick (16 September 2023). "Pa. Turnpike bridge in North Huntingdon safe for traffic after strike by truck, official says". Trib Live. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  13. ^ a b "Trucks vs. Bridges: A dangerous and costly collision straining state budgets". Pennsylvania Capital-Star. 9 December 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  14. ^ Boeckel, Teresa (5 September 2022). "I-83 Queen Street overpass repair costs double after second bridge strike, PennDOT says". York Daily Record. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  15. ^ Collapse of the Interstate 5 Skagit River Bridge, Following a Strike by an Oversize Combination Vehicle, Mount Vernon, Washington, May 23, 2013 (PDF) (Technical report). National Transportation Safety Board. 15 June 2014. NTSB/HAR-14/01. Retrieved 4 September 2023.
  16. ^ "Five killed in similar crash in 1994". The Herald. 18 July 1996. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  17. ^ Magome, Mogomotsi (24 December 2022). "Truck with liquified gas explodes in South Africa; 8 killed". AP. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  18. ^ a b c d Preventing of Strikes on Bridge Over Highways - A Protocol for Highway Managers & Bridge Owners (PDF) (2 ed.). Network Rail on behalf of Bridge Strike Prevention Group. p. 6–35. Retrieved 29 August 2023.
  19. ^ "2009 Edition Chapter 2C. Warning Signs And Object Markers". Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
  20. ^ "Federal Size Regulations for Commercial Motor Vehicles". Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
  21. ^ "Trucking Legal Height Limits Map". Heavy Haul Trucking. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
  22. ^ a b "Height Clearance on Roads" (PDF). Vic Roads. November 2009. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  23. ^ "Traffic instruction signs". The State of Queensland. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
  24. ^ McGlothlen, John (20 August 2009). "Other Iowa City railroad bridge crashes on Iowa Avenue". The Gazette. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  25. ^ Walubita, Lubinda F.; Faruk, Abu NM; Ntaimo, Lewis. Intelligent Freight Monitoring: A Review of Potential Technologies (PDF) (Technical report). Texas A&M Transportation Institute. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  26. ^ a b c Highway Tunnel Operations (PDF). Transportation Research Board. 1975. pp. 10–11. ISBN 0-309-02338-6. Retrieved 24 September 2023.
  27. ^ Amiller, Amy Miller (27 June 2022). "Truck strikes covered bridge again". Times News. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  28. ^ CD 366 Design criteria for collision protection beams. Highways England. March 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  29. ^ Al Amir, Salam (9 July 2019). "Fatal Dubai bus crash barrier incorrectly sited, lawyers claim". The National. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
  30. ^ a b Lee, Timothy B. (6 January 2016). "Trucks have hit this low bridge more than 100 times, and officials still haven't fixed it". Vox. Retrieved 24 September 2023.
  31. ^ Cohen, Ben (6 January 2016). "The Joys of Watching a Bridge Shave the Tops Off Trucks". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 24 September 2023.
  32. ^ Schesser, Joel; Tanner, Donald N. (May 1980). "Hampton Roads Traffic Surveillance and Control System" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. VT-29 (2): 138–139. Retrieved 24 September 2023.
  33. ^ a b c Maghiar, Marcel; Jackson, Mike; Maldonado, Gustavo (February 2017). Warning Systems Evaluation for Overhead Clearance Detection (PDF) (Technical report). Georgia Department of Transportation Office of Research. FHWAGA-16-1521. Retrieved 24 September 2023.
  34. ^ Cheromcha, Kyle (27 February 2019). "Watch the Famously Low '11-Foot-8′ Bridge Claim Two Refrigerated Box Trucks in Two Days". The Drive. Retrieved 24 September 2023.
  35. ^ Crawford, David (7 October 2013). "Keeping over-height and overheating vehicles out of tunnels". ITS International. Retrieved 17 September 2023.
  36. ^ Plavskaya, Yelena (May 27, 2018). "Петербуржцы подарили «мосту глупости» юбилейный торт" [Petersburgers Give “Bridge of Stupidity” a Birthday Cake]. Izvestiya.
  37. ^ "150th Truck Gets Stuck Under St. Petersburg's 'Bridge of Stupidity'". The Moscow Times. May 28, 2018.
  38. ^ Hooley, Danny (January 6, 2016). "A little off the top: Durham's "Canopener Bridge" makes the front page of The Wall Street Journal". Indy Week. Archived from the original on January 9, 2016. Retrieved January 8, 2016.
  39. ^ "In the news". 11foot8.com. 24 April 2019.
  40. ^ "Unterführung wird jetzt deppensicher gemacht" [Underpass is Deepened]. 20 Minuten.
  41. ^ Hilzinger, Stefan. "Kanton und Stadt entschärfen die Frauenfelder Deppenfalle" [Canton and City Defuse the Frauenfelder Deppenfalle]. St. Galler Tagblatt.
  42. ^ Impact! New warning system on Guy St. underpass aims to reduce truck accidents, AMT train delays
  43. ^ IMPACT in action
  44. ^ Truck removed
  45. ^ Contact of Robert Cenac and Tow with Houma Twin Span Bridge (PDF) (Technical report). National Transportation Safety Board. 8 March 2023. MIR-23-06. Retrieved 4 September 2023.
  46. ^ Eppes, Mary Grace (12 January 2016). "Four barges sink after hitting Miss. River bridge". WLBT. Retrieved 4 September 2023.
  47. ^ "Towing Vessel Pilot Never Reported Hitting Bridge in Louisiana". National Transportation Safety Board. 23 February 2023. Retrieved 4 September 2023.
  48. ^ Knott & Prucz 2000, 60.2.5.
  49. ^ "Air Draft is Critical!" (PDF). United States Coast Guard. 9 September 2014. Retrieved 4 September 2023.
  50. ^ "33 CFR 118.45 Lighting for the protection of aerial navigation". Code of Federal Regulations. National Archives and Records Administration. The owner of a bridge which constitutes a hazard to aerial navigation should maintain, in addition to the lights prescribed in this part, such lights as may be prescribed by the Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration.

Sources

edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bridge_strike&oldid=1217922981#Overheight_vehicle_detection_systems"