Heronian tetrahedron

(Redirected from Perfect pyramid)

A Heronian tetrahedron[1] (also called a Heron tetrahedron[2] or perfect pyramid[3]) is a tetrahedron whose edge lengths, face areas and volume are all integers. The faces must therefore all be Heronian triangles (named for Hero of Alexandria). Every Heronian tetrahedron can be arranged in Euclidean space so that its vertex coordinates are also integers.[1]

Examples

edit

An example known to Leonhard Euler is a Heronian birectangular tetrahedron, a tetrahedron with a path of three edges parallel to the three coordinate axes and with all faces being right triangles. The lengths of the edges on the path of axis-parallel edges are 153, 104, and 672, and the other three edge lengths are 185, 680, and 697, forming four right triangle faces described by the Pythagorean triples (153,104,185), (104,672,680), (153,680,697), and (185,672,697).[4]

Eight examples of Heronian tetrahedra were discovered in 1877 by Reinhold Hoppe.[5]

117 is the smallest possible length of the longest edge of a perfect tetrahedron with integral edge lengths. Its other edge lengths are 51, 52, 53, 80 and 84.[3] 8064 is the smallest possible volume (and 6384 is the smallest possible surface area) of a perfect tetrahedron. The integral edge lengths of a Heronian tetrahedron with this volume and surface area are 25, 39, 56, 120, 153 and 160.[6]

In 1943, E. P. Starke published another example, in which two faces are isosceles triangles with base 896 and sides 1073, and the other two faces are also isosceles with base 990 and the same sides.[7] However, Starke made an error in reporting its volume which has become widely copied.[2] The correct volume is 124185600, twice the number reported by Starke.[8]

Sascha Kurz has used computer search algorithms to find all Heronian tetrahedra with longest edge length at most 600000.[9]

Classification, infinite families, and special types of tetrahedron

edit

A regular tetrahedron (one with all faces being equilateral) cannot be a Heronian tetrahedron because, for regular tetrahedra whose edge lengths are integers, the face areas and volume are irrational numbers.[10] For the same reason no Heronian tetrahedron can have an equilateral triangle as one of its faces.[3]

There are infinitely many Heronian tetrahedra, and more strongly infinitely many Heronian disphenoids, tetrahedra in which all faces are congruent and each pair of opposite sides has equal lengths. In this case, there are only three edge lengths needed to describe the tetrahedron, rather than six, and the triples of lengths that define Heronian tetrahedra can be characterized using an elliptic curve.[3][11] There are also infinitely many Heronian tetrahedra with a cycle of four equal edge lengths, in which all faces are isosceles triangles.[2]

There are also infinitely many Heronian birectangular tetrahedra. One method for generating tetrahedra of this type derives the axis-parallel edge lengths  ,  , and   from two equal sums of fourth powers

 

using the formulas

 
 
 

For instance, the tetrahedron derived in this way from an identity of Leonhard Euler,  , has  ,  , and   equal to 386678175, 332273368, and 379083360, with the hypotenuse of right triangle   equal to 509828993, the hypotenuse of right triangle   equal to 504093032, and the hypotenuse of the remaining two sides equal to 635318657.[8] For these tetrahedra,  ,  , and   form the edge lengths of an almost-perfect cuboid, a rectangular cuboid in which the sides, two of the three face diagonals, and the body diagonal are all integers.[4]

No example of a Heronian trirectangular tetrahedron had been found and no one has proven that none exist.

A complete classification of all Heronian tetrahedra remains unknown.[1][2]

edit

An alternative definition of Heronian triangles is that they can be formed by gluing together two integer right triangles along a common side. This definition has also been generalized to three dimensions, leading to a different class of tetrahedra that have also been called Heron tetrahedra.[12]

References

edit
  1. ^ a b c Marshall, Susan H.; Perlis, Alexander R. (2013), "Heronian tetrahedra are lattice tetrahedra" (PDF), American Mathematical Monthly, 120 (2): 140–149, doi:10.4169/amer.math.monthly.120.02.140, MR 3029939, S2CID 15888158
  2. ^ a b c d Chisholm, C.; MacDougall, J. A. (2006), "Rational and Heron tetrahedra", Journal of Number Theory, 121 (1): 153–185, doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2006.02.009, hdl:1959.13/26739, MR 2268761
  3. ^ a b c d Buchholz, Ralph Heiner (1992), "Perfect pyramids" (PDF), Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, 45 (3): 353–368, doi:10.1017/S0004972700030252, MR 1165142, archived from the original (PDF) on October 27, 2009
  4. ^ a b Gardner, Martin (1983), "Chapter 2: Diophantine Analysis and Fermat's Last Theorem", Wheels, Life and Other Mathematical Amusements, W. H. Freeman, pp. 10–19, Bibcode:1983wlom.book.....G; see in particular page 14
  5. ^ Hoppe, R. (1877), "Über rationale Dreikante und Tetraeder", Archiv der Mathematik und Physik, 61: 86–98, as cited by Chisholm & MacDougall (2006)
  6. ^ Peterson, Ivars (July 2003), "Math Trek: Perfect Pyramids", Science News, archived from the original on February 20, 2008
  7. ^ Starke, E. P. (June–July 1943), "E 544: A commensurable tetrahedron", Problems and solutions, The American Mathematical Monthly, 50 (6): 390, doi:10.2307/2303724, JSTOR 2303724
  8. ^ a b "Problem 930" (PDF), Solutions, Crux Mathematicorum, 11 (5): 162–166, May 1985
  9. ^ Kurz, Sascha (2008), "On the generation of Heronian triangles", Serdica Journal of Computing, 2 (2): 181–196, arXiv:1401.6150, MR 2473583
  10. ^ Coxeter, H. S. M. (1973), Regular Polytopes (3rd ed.), Dover, Table I(i), pp. 292–293
  11. ^ Güntsche, R. (1907), "Rationale Tetraeder mit kongruenten Seiten", Sitzungsberichte der Berliner Mathematische Gesellschaft, 6: 38–53, as cited by Chisholm & MacDougall (2006)
  12. ^ Lin, C.-S. (November 2011), "95.66 The reciprocal volume of a Heron tetrahedron", The Mathematical Gazette, 95 (534): 542–545, doi:10.1017/S0025557200003740, JSTOR 23248533 (about a different concept with the same name)
edit