Portal:U.S. roads/Selected article/Recommend/2007


January 2007

To commemorate the recent WP:GA promotion of California State Route 37, I will make SR 37 this month's featured article. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 07:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

February 2007

Perhaps pending the good article review that seems to be stuck in limbo, I nominate Interstate 295 (Delaware-New Jersey). -- NORTH talk 08:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

April 2007

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the poll was support I-476. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 18:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Interstate 476 might be good; it's a GA! Important route from Philadelphia to Scranton/Wilkes-Barre and the rest of NE Pennsylvania.  V60 VTalk · VDemolitions · VRoads 21:05, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Support per tradition of featuring articles at or close to GA status. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 21:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

May 2007

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the poll was U.S. Route 9 in New York. V60 干什么? · VDemolitions · VRoads (路) 22:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

June 2007

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the poll was SR 1002. (zelzany - new age roads) 16:36, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

  • New York State Thruway This article has been improved a lot recently with the removal of the trivia section to the improval of the exit lists. Bernstein2291 18:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

July 2007

The following is an archived roads selected article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the selected article nomination was U.S. Route 40. (zelzany - new age roads) 00:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

The above is an archived roads selected article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page, on WT:USRD, or another applicable discussion page. No further edits should be made to this section.

August 2007

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the poll was support PA 39. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 20:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Pennsylvania Route 39 — renom'd from last month (a state route GA also is A-class)
    • Support, has lots of information on the route history, including current and future developments. Shows the history of the route, including when the number was used prior to modern PA 39. The article is an A-class, good article. --Son 19:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Support as well. Right now, it's the most qualified of the four offered in my opinion. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 20:02, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • New Jersey Route 33 — a state route GA
  • Pennsylvania Route 145 — a state route GA
  • Pennsylvania Route 222 — a state route GA
    • Support, has a long and well written history with information dating back to the early 1900s. It has plenty of diagrams as well. -- JA10 TalkContribs 20:12, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

September 2007

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the poll was support I-15 in AZ. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 08:22, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Article I am recommending is U.S. Route 209 in Pennsylvania.Rock sold B-class article. Will go for GA as soon as History is completed.Mitchcontribs 22:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Oppose. Look at the size of that lead... --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Oppose per Rschen. Also, the "Attractions" section is better suited for a travel guide than an encyclopedic article. They can be given mention in the route description, but unless the attraction is unquestionably notable, this is also a spotty practice. The history is a bit weak, as indicated in the nom, and the images shouldn't be all aligned right; rather, staggered, alternating from left to right. Finally, why is the communities box hide/show? The point of the box is to be seen. If size is that much of an issue, remove some smaller locations or reduce the font size in the box as done on NY 52. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Interstate 15 in Arizona - Recent GA, quality article for a short stretch of road. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Support A small stretch that has a lot to talk about - good! - master sonT - C 22:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Support with few reservations. Has just about everything that can be said about that segment of I-15. Well referenced and well written. However, it has a bit too many images and some should be moved to a category on the commons, which can then be linked to from the infobox. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Support per everyone. -- JA10 TalkContribs 19:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

October 2007

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the poll was support US 50 -- JA10 TalkContribs 23:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

November 2007

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Support US-15 NY. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

December 2007

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the poll. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the poll was support NY 9A by default. No alternative nominations were made; no opposition to NY 9A was made. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 10:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.