Portal talk:History
This portal was identified as a featured portal before the process ended in 2017. | ||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the portal about History.
Content dispute discussions should take place on the appropriate article's talk page. For discussions about general portal development, please see the WikiProject Portals talk page.
Archives: Index, 1If you are a regular maintainer of this portal, please add yourself to this list. |
This portal does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Portal:History:
|
Automated portal content suggestions ( ) The following suggestions have been automatically generated as content that might be suitable for the portal, subject to review by a human editor. Please do not mindlessly copy items to the portal page without first checking that the suggestions are appropriate.
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Main portal page | |
---|---|
Portal:History | |
Static subpages | |
Intro/Image | |
WikiProjects | |
Categories | |
Subportals | |
Dynamic subpages | |
Featured picture | |
Did you know | |
Recognized content | |
Featured biography | |
Quote | |
Other | |
Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries | |
Things you can do | |
Portal:History/box-header | |
Portal:History/box-footer |
Sumerian King List has an RFC
editSumerian King List has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Malcolm X is repeated twice on List of featured biographies
editMalcolm X entry is repeated twice at positions 19 and 27. Saviourofthe (talk) 01:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Saviourofthe: Well spotted! Fixed. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
IMPORTANT
editIt's a pity that there is so much italic confusion in the articles "Via Aemilia" and "Via Flaminia". The question is: should they be written in italics? Both articles are both italicised and not. Consistency in the same article is very important (remember, if you decide for italics or not, to do the same with all the other pages that use these terms, otherwise there is no point). JackkBrown (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- See MOS:FOREIGNITALIC: non-English words should be italicised using template:Language (for screen readers). Except of course for loan words that have been assimilated. Thus Via Aemilia, Rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré. Except if you go to Rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré, practically none of it complies. Sigh. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)