The 1962 Quebec general election was held on November 14, 1962, to elect members of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Quebec, Canada. The incumbent Quebec Liberal Party, led by Jean Lesage, was re-elected, defeating the Union Nationale (UN) led by Daniel Johnson, Sr.
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
95 seats in the 27th Legislative Assembly of Quebec 48 seats were needed for a majority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In an unusual move, the election was called just two years after the previous 1960 general election. Lesage sought a mandate for the Nationalization of the electricity industry, with the slogan Maîtres chez nous (Masters in Our Own Home), declaring it a single issue important enough to stake his political career on it.
A few days before the election, the Union Nationale's chief organizer André Lagarde was arrested for fraud. The Liberals claimed this was proof of lingering corruption dating from the Maurice Duplessis era, but the UN cried foul and was vindicated after the election. However, the incident may well have contributed to the UN's defeat.
The Liberal Party won an increased number of seats and a higher percentage of the popular vote, and the nationalization program was carried out. Future Parti Québécois founder René Lévesque served as a cabinet minister in the Lesage government and spearheaded the nationalization of power utilities for a great expansion of Hydro-Québec.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/52/Maitres_chez_nous_1962.jpg/240px-Maitres_chez_nous_1962.jpg)
Action provinciale, a new group founded by Hertel Larocque (a former secretary of Camillien Houde),[1] fielded 11 candidates in the election but failed to gather a significant number of votes. Johnson opted not to have the UN join forces with it, keeping in mind the failure the Liberals had had in attempting the same manoeuvre with the Créditistes in 1956.[1] However, Social Credit was still a force to reckon with even while not campaigning on the provincial scene,[1] and Johnson did not hesitate to use its vocabulary in his speeches while on the campaign trail.[2]
Candidates | Lib | UN | Ind | I-Lib | I-UN | AP | Con | Comm | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 67 | 67 | 134 | ||||||
3 | 24 | 24 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 72 |
4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | ||||
5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | ||
Total | 95 | 95 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 224 |
Results
editPolitical party | Party leader | MPPs | Votes | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidates | 1960 | 1962 | ± | # | ± | % | ± (pp) | |||
Liberal | Jean Lesage | 95 | 52 | 63 | 11 | 1,205,253 | 128,118 | 56.40% | 5.02 | |
Union Nationale | Daniel Johnson, Sr. | 95 | 42 | 31 | 11 | 900,817 | 76,490 | 42.15% | 4.46 | |
Independent | 9 | 1 | 1 | 13,581 | 8,606 | 0.64% | 0.42 | |||
Other candidates | ||||||||||
█ Independent-Liberal | 10 | 11,209 | 3,001 | 0.52% | 0.13 | |||||
█ Conservative | 1 | 4,255 | 4,255 | 0.20% | New | |||||
█ Action provinciale | 11 | 1,445 | 1,445 | 0.07% | New | |||||
█ Independent-Unionist | 2 | 336 | 10,195 | 0.02% | 0.48 | |||||
█ Communist | 1 | 71 | 465 | 0.00% | 0.03 | |||||
Total | 224 | 95 | 95 | 2,136,967 | 100% | |||||
Rejected ballots | 29,509 | 4,012 | ||||||||
Voter turnout | 2,166,476 | 36,369 | 79.59 | 2.07 | ||||||
Registered electors | 2,721,933 | 113,494 |
Party | Seats | Votes | Change (pp) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
█ Liberal | 63 / 95 |
5.02 | |||
█ Union Nationale | 31 / 95 |
-4.46 | |||
█ Independent | 1 / 95 |
-0.42 | |||
█ Other | 0 / 95 |
-0.14 |
Synopsis of results
editRiding | Winning party | Turnout [a 1] |
Votes | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | 1960 | Party | Votes | Share | Margin # |
Margin % |
Lib | UN | Ind | I-Lib | AP | Other | Total | ||||||
Abitibi-Est | Lib | Lib | 14,892 | 51.93% | 1,109 | 3.87% | 85.24% | 14,892 | 13,783 | – | – | – | – | 28,675 | |||||
Abitibi-Ouest | Lib | Lib | 6,732 | 56.97% | 1,648 | 13.95% | 88.52% | 6,732 | 5,084 | – | – | – | – | 11,816 | |||||
Argenteuil | UN | UN | 7,922 | 54.57% | 2,610 | 17.98% | 86.22% | 5,312 | 7,922 | – | 1,284 | – | – | 14,518 | |||||
Arthabaska | Lib | Lib | 10,988 | 53.54% | 1,453 | 7.08% | 91.70% | 10,988 | 9,535 | – | – | – | – | 20,523 | |||||
Bagot | UN | UN | 5,336 | 55.11% | 989 | 10.21% | 92.36% | 4,347 | 5,336 | – | – | – | – | 9,683 | |||||
Beauce | Lib | UN | 12,583 | 51.96% | 947 | 3.91% | 87.25% | 11,636 | 12,583 | – | – | – | – | 24,219 | |||||
Beauharnois | UN | Lib | 11,884 | 51.72% | 791 | 3.44% | 90.19% | 11,884 | 11,093 | – | – | – | – | 22,977 | |||||
Bellechasse | Lib | UN | 5,176 | 51.35% | 273 | 2.71% | 80.81% | 4,903 | 5,176 | – | – | – | – | 10,079 | |||||
Berthier | UN | Lib | 5,938 | 50.05% | 110 | 0.93% | 85.57% | 5,938 | 5,828 | – | – | 98 | – | 11,864 | |||||
Bonaventure | Lib | Lib | 9,525 | 57.28% | 2,421 | 14.56% | 85.26% | 9,525 | 7,104 | – | – | – | – | 16,629 | |||||
Bourget | Lib | Lib | 42,906 | 58.74% | 17,728 | 24.27% | 73.21% | 42,906 | 25,178 | 4,807 | – | 153 | – | 73,044 | |||||
Brome | Lib | Lib | 3,417 | 55.82% | 713 | 11.65% | 81.43% | 3,417 | 2,704 | – | – | – | – | 6,121 | |||||
Chambly | Lib | Lib | 36,290 | 63.83% | 17,094 | 30.07% | 76.89% | 36,290 | 19,196 | 778 | 353 | – | 235 | 56,852 | |||||
Champlain | UN | UN | 12,346 | 52.74% | 1,282 | 5.48% | 90.97% | 11,064 | 12,346 | – | – | – | – | 23,410 | |||||
Charlevoix | UN | Lib | 6,942 | 52.23% | 594 | 4.47% | 87.21% | 6,942 | 6,348 | – | – | – | – | 13,290 | |||||
Châteauguay | UN | Lib | 8,727 | 54.83% | 1,538 | 9.66% | 84.04% | 8,727 | 7,189 | – | – | – | – | 15,916 | |||||
Chicoutimi | UN | UN | 16,910 | 50.29% | 192 | 0.57% | 88.05% | 16,718 | 16,910 | – | – | – | – | 33,628 | |||||
Compton | UN | UN | 5,568 | 54.45% | 1,014 | 9.92% | 87.30% | 4,554 | 5,568 | – | – | 104 | – | 10,226 | |||||
Deux-Montagnes | Lib | Lib | 8,518 | 57.31% | 2,174 | 14.63% | 86.94% | 8,518 | 6,344 | – | – | – | – | 14,862 | |||||
Dorchester | UN | UN | 7,818 | 53.64% | 1,060 | 7.27% | 83.78% | 6,758 | 7,818 | – | – | – | – | 14,576 | |||||
Drummond | Lib | Lib | 14,621 | 57.17% | 3,668 | 14.34% | 90.97% | 14,621 | 10,953 | – | – | – | – | 25,574 | |||||
Duplessis | Lib | Lib | 7,345 | 59.84% | 2,416 | 19.68% | 79.19% | 7,345 | 4,929 | – | – | – | – | 12,274 | |||||
Frontenac | UN | UN | 6,217 | 52.46% | 582 | 4.91% | 87.92% | 5,635 | 6,217 | – | – | – | – | 11,852 | |||||
Gaspé-Nord | Lib | UN | 5,183 | 51.75% | 444 | 4.43% | 88.07% | 4,739 | 5,183 | 93 | – | – | – | 10,015 | |||||
Gaspé-Sud | UN | Lib | 7,197 | 50.40% | 113 | 0.79% | 89.09% | 7,197 | 7,084 | – | – | – | – | 14,281 | |||||
Gatineau | UN | Lib | 10,289 | 54.57% | 1,725 | 9.15% | 77.83% | 10,289 | 8,564 | – | – | – | – | 18,853 | |||||
Hull | Lib | Lib | 14,854 | 63.36% | 6,266 | 26.73% | 78.05% | 14,854 | 8,588 | – | – | – | – | 23,442 | |||||
Huntingdon | UN | UN | 3,449 | 54.14% | 528 | 8.29% | 85.15% | 2,921 | 3,449 | – | – | – | – | 6,370 | |||||
Iberville | Lib | Lib | 4,452 | 55.87% | 936 | 11.75% | 91.07% | 4,452 | 3,516 | – | – | – | – | 7,968 | |||||
Îles-de-la-Madeleine | UN | Lib | 2,674 | 51.86% | 192 | 3.72% | 92.10% | 2,674 | 2,482 | – | – | – | – | 5,156 | |||||
Jacques-Cartier | Lib | Lib | 69,199 | 77.74% | 49,388 | 55.49% | 72.46% | 69,199 | 19,811 | – | – | – | – | 89,010 | |||||
Joliette | UN | UN | 10,236 | 52.96% | 5,037 | 26.06% | 85.90% | 5,199 | 10,236 | – | 3,891 | – | – | 19,326 | |||||
Jonquière-Kénogami | Lib | Lib | 16,100 | 60.38% | 5,536 | 20.76% | 86.48% | 16,100 | 10,564 | – | – | – | – | 26,664 | |||||
Kamouraska | UN | Lib | 5,453 | 50.19% | 41 | 0.38% | 82.02% | 5,453 | 5,412 | – | – | – | – | 10,865 | |||||
L'Assomption | Lib | Lib | 9,680 | 55.06% | 1,984 | 11.29% | 84.49% | 9,680 | 7,696 | – | 70 | 134 | – | 17,580 | |||||
L'Islet | Lib | UN | 5,239 | 53.25% | 639 | 6.49% | 83.90% | 4,600 | 5,239 | – | – | – | – | 9,839 | |||||
Labelle | UN | UN | 6,005 | 57.11% | 1,695 | 16.12% | 84.51% | 4,310 | 6,005 | 199 | – | – | – | 10,514 | |||||
Lac-Saint-Jean | Lib | Lib | 9,171 | 52.63% | 915 | 5.25% | 89.25% | 9,171 | 8,256 | – | – | – | – | 17,427 | |||||
Laval | Lib | Lib | 67,316 | 66.31% | 33,807 | 33.30% | 76.57% | 67,316 | 33,509 | – | 461 | 237 | – | 101,523 | |||||
Laviolette | UN | UN | 11,315 | 53.63% | 1,533 | 7.27% | 85.24% | 9,782 | 11,315 | – | – | – | – | 21,097 | |||||
Lévis | Lib | Lib | 13,434 | 54.43% | 2,346 | 9.51% | 88.47% | 13,434 | 11,088 | 158 | – | – | – | 24,680 | |||||
Lotbinière | UN | UN | 6,393 | 53.56% | 849 | 7.11% | 88.62% | 5,544 | 6,393 | – | – | – | – | 11,937 | |||||
Maisonneuve | UN | Lib | 28,814 | 58.89% | 8,702 | 17.79% | 71.75% | 28,814 | 20,112 | – | – | – | – | 48,926 | |||||
Maskinongé | UN | UN | 5,312 | 53.71% | 734 | 7.42% | 91.18% | 4,578 | 5,312 | – | – | – | – | 9,890 | |||||
Matane | Lib | Lib | 8,204 | 50.40% | 130 | 0.80% | 83.20% | 8,204 | 8,074 | – | – | – | – | 16,278 | |||||
Matapédia | Lib | Lib | 6,111 | 51.05% | 252 | 2.11% | 84.29% | 6,111 | 5,859 | – | – | – | – | 11,970 | |||||
Mégantic | Lib | Lib | 13,182 | 55.05% | 2,420 | 10.11% | 88.95% | 13,182 | 10,762 | – | – | – | – | 23,944 | |||||
Missisquoi | UN | UN | 7,630 | 57.38% | 1,962 | 14.75% | 84.84% | 5,668 | 7,630 | – | – | – | – | 13,298 | |||||
Montcalm | UN | Lib | 4,662 | 55.41% | 911 | 10.83% | 88.54% | 4,662 | 3,751 | – | – | – | – | 8,413 | |||||
Montmagny | Lib | UN | 5,747 | 50.49% | 111 | 0.98% | 86.57% | 5,636 | 5,747 | – | – | – | – | 11,383 | |||||
Montmorency | UN | UN | 5,717 | 50.67% | 398 | 3.53% | 88.32% | 5,319 | 5,717 | – | – | 247 | – | 11,283 | |||||
Montréal–Jeanne-Mance | UN | Lib | 40,899 | 59.64% | 13,740 | 20.04% | 68.18% | 40,899 | 27,159 | 519 | – | – | – | 68,577 | |||||
Montréal-Laurier | Lib | Lib | 15,837 | 58.16% | 4,563 | 16.76% | 76.41% | 15,837 | 11,274 | – | – | 117 | – | 27,228 | |||||
Montréal-Mercier | UN | Lib | 16,992 | 54.07% | 3,322 | 10.57% | 75.56% | 16,992 | 13,670 | – | 764 | – | – | 31,426 | |||||
Montréal–Notre-Dame-de-Grâce | Lib | Lib | 37,100 | 78.55% | 29,357 | 62.15% | 59.89% | 37,100 | 7,743 | – | 2,389 | – | – | 47,232 | |||||
Montréal-Outremont | Lib | Lib | 36,076 | 77.63% | 26,647 | 57.34% | 60.34% | 36,076 | 9,429 | 969 | – | – | – | 46,474 | |||||
Montréal–Saint-Henri | Lib | Lib | 17,548 | 53.04% | 2,540 | 7.68% | 70.28% | 17,548 | 15,008 | – | 531 | – | – | 33,087 | |||||
Montréal–Saint-Jacques | UN | UN | 7,854 | 52.10% | 705 | 4.68% | 65.65% | 7,149 | 7,854 | – | – | – | 71 | 15,074 | |||||
Montréal–Saint-Louis | Lib | Lib | 14,082 | 58.15% | 3,949 | 16.31% | 60.95% | 14,082 | 10,133 | – | – | – | – | 24,215 | |||||
Montréal–Sainte-Anne | Ind | Ind | 6,058 | 45.84% | 746 | 5.65% | 57.89% | 5,312 | 1,845 | 6,058 | – | – | – | 13,215 | |||||
Montréal–Sainte-Marie | UN | UN | 12,977 | 52.47% | 1,321 | 5.34% | 67.43% | 11,656 | 12,977 | – | – | – | 101 | 24,734 | |||||
Montréal-Verdun | Lib | Lib | 21,208 | 65.98% | 10,274 | 31.96% | 72.80% | 21,208 | 10,934 | – | – | – | – | 32,142 | |||||
Napierville-Laprairie | UN | Lib | 9,865 | 56.53% | 2,278 | 13.05% | 86.33% | 9,865 | 7,587 | – | – | – | – | 17,452 | |||||
Nicolet | UN | Lib | 7,209 | 51.74% | 484 | 3.47% | 85.96% | 7,209 | 6,725 | – | – | – | – | 13,934 | |||||
Papineau | UN | UN | 12,304 | 55.28% | 2,351 | 10.56% | 85.66% | 9,953 | 12,304 | – | – | – | – | 22,257 | |||||
Pontiac | UN | UN | 5,108 | 59.81% | 1,675 | 19.61% | 75.86% | 3,433 | 5,108 | – | – | – | – | 8,541 | |||||
Portneuf | Lib | Lib | 11,059 | 51.34% | 702 | 3.26% | 85.36% | 11,059 | 10,357 | – | – | 124 | – | 21,540 | |||||
Québec-Centre | UN | Lib | 9,750 | 55.13% | 1,813 | 10.25% | 84.08% | 9,750 | 7,937 | – | – | – | – | 17,687 | |||||
Québec-Comté | Lib | Lib | 34,090 | 57.80% | 9,196 | 15.59% | 87.07% | 34,090 | 24,894 | – | – | – | – | 58,984 | |||||
Québec-Est | UN | Lib | 21,001 | 52.20% | 1,767 | 4.39% | 88.59% | 21,001 | 19,234 | – | – | – | – | 40,235 | |||||
Québec-Ouest | Lib | Lib | 14,582 | 67.91% | 7,692 | 35.82% | 88.24% | 14,582 | 6,890 | – | – | – | – | 21,472 | |||||
Richelieu | Lib | Lib | 10,598 | 55.61% | 2,137 | 11.21% | 90.11% | 10,598 | 8,461 | – | – | – | – | 19,059 | |||||
Richmond | Lib | Lib | 9,932 | 57.88% | 2,703 | 15.75% | 85.16% | 9,932 | 7,229 | – | – | – | – | 17,161 | |||||
Rimouski | Lib | Lib | 10,720 | 52.22% | 911 | 4.44% | 82.70% | 10,720 | 9,809 | – | – | – | – | 20,529 | |||||
Rivière-du-Loup | Lib | Lib | 8,493 | 51.22% | 403 | 2.43% | 85.70% | 8,493 | 8,090 | – | – | – | – | 16,583 | |||||
Roberval | Lib | UN | 11,172 | 51.23% | 537 | 2.46% | 85.07% | 10,635 | 11,172 | – | – | – | – | 21,807 | |||||
Rouville | UN | Lib | 6,575 | 56.08% | 1,426 | 12.16% | 86.80% | 6,575 | 5,149 | – | – | – | – | 11,724 | |||||
Rouyn-Noranda | Lib | Lib | 9,386 | 60.06% | 3,144 | 20.12% | 85.50% | 9,386 | 6,242 | – | – | – | – | 15,628 | |||||
Saguenay | Lib | Lib | 12,116 | 57.35% | 3,106 | 14.70% | 78.97% | 12,116 | 9,010 | – | – | – | – | 21,126 | |||||
Saint-Hyacinthe | Lib | Lib | 12,070 | 56.30% | 2,701 | 12.60% | 84.85% | 12,070 | 9,369 | – | – | – | – | 21,439 | |||||
Saint-Jean | Lib | Lib | 8,869 | 50.55% | 866 | 4.94% | 89.57% | 8,869 | 8,003 | – | 672 | – | – | 17,544 | |||||
Saint-Maurice | Lib | Lib | 15,684 | 55.73% | 3,224 | 11.46% | 88.19% | 15,684 | 12,460 | – | – | – | – | 28,144 | |||||
Saint-Sauveur | UN | UN | 12,641 | 51.43% | 702 | 2.86% | 89.13% | 11,939 | 12,641 | – | – | – | – | 24,580 | |||||
Shefford | UN | UN | 12,026 | 50.01% | 800 | 3.33% | 85.22% | 11,226 | 12,026 | – | 794 | – | – | 24,046 | |||||
Sherbrooke | Lib | Lib | 18,539 | 52.46% | 1,825 | 5.16% | 81.29% | 18,539 | 16,714 | – | – | 86 | – | 35,339 | |||||
Stanstead | Lib | Lib | 8,918 | 56.32% | 2,101 | 13.27% | 84.29% | 8,918 | 6,817 | – | – | 99 | – | 15,834 | |||||
Témiscamingue | UN | Lib | 4,102 | 52.98% | 462 | 5.97% | 87.18% | 4,102 | 3,640 | – | – | – | – | 7,742 | |||||
Témiscouata | UN | UN | 5,931 | 60.69% | 2,089 | 21.38% | 82.38% | 3,842 | 5,931 | – | – | – | – | 9,773 | |||||
Terrebonne | Lib | Lib | 26,901 | 58.98% | 8,188 | 17.95% | 85.00% | 26,901 | 18,713 | – | – | – | – | 45,614 | |||||
Trois-Rivières | UN | UN | 15,323 | 51.75% | 1,036 | 3.50% | 89.96% | 14,287 | 15,323 | – | – | – | – | 29,610 | |||||
Vaudreuil-Soulanges | Lib | Lib | 10,780 | 57.49% | 2,809 | 14.98% | 90.45% | 10,780 | 7,971 | – | – | – | – | 18,751 | |||||
Verchères | Lib | Lib | 6,827 | 58.51% | 1,985 | 17.01% | 87.62% | 6,827 | 4,842 | – | – | – | – | 11,669 | |||||
Westmount–Saint-Georges | Lib | Lib | 13,114 | 69.03% | 11,486 | 60.46% | 59.04% | 13,114 | 1,628 | – | – | – | 4,255 | 18,997 | |||||
Wolfe | Lib | UN | 3,939 | 52.92% | 481 | 6.46% | 90.26% | 3,458 | 3,939 | – | – | 46 | – | 7,443 | |||||
Yamaska | UN | UN | 4,078 | 60.16% | 1,377 | 20.31% | 84.60% | 2,701 | 4,078 | – | – | – | – | 6,779 |
- ^ including spoilt ballots
- = open seat
- = turnout is above provincial average
- = winning candidate was in previous Legislature
- = incumbent had switched allegiance
- = not incumbent; was previously elected to the Legislature
- = incumbency arose from byelection gain
- = other incumbents renominated
- = multiple candidates
Analysis
editParty in 1st place | Party in 2nd place | Total | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lib | UN | Con | |||
Liberal | 62 | 1 | 63 | ||
Union Nationale | 31 | 31 | |||
Independent | 1 | 1 | |||
Total | 32 | 62 | 1 | 95 |
Parties | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
█ Liberal | 63 | 62 | 2 | ||
█ Union Nationale | 31 | 52 | 1 | ||
█ Independent | 1 | 7 | 1 | ||
█ Conservative | 1 | ||||
█ Action provinciale | 9 | 1 | 1 | ||
█ Independent Liberal | 8 | 2 | |||
█ Independent UN | 1 | 1 | |||
█ Communist | 1 |
Source | Party | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lib | UN | Ind | Total | ||
Seats retained | Incumbents returned | 43 | 21 | 1 | 65 |
Open seats held | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||
Byelection loss reversed | 1 | 1 | |||
Seats changing hands | Incumbents defeated | 17 | 5 | 22 | |
Incumbents defeated - previous incumbents returned | 1 | 1 | |||
Open seats gained | 1 | 1 | |||
Byelection gain held | 1 | 1 | |||
Total | 63 | 31 | 1 | 95 |
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b c Lemieux 1969, p. 18.
- ^ Lemieux 1969, p. 19.
- ^ a b c d e Drouilly, Pierre (November 7, 2017). "Élections québécoises de 1962". donneesquebec.ca. Atlas des élections au Québec.
- ^ a b "Les membres de l'Assemblée nationale par circonscription" [National Assembly members by riding] (in French). National Assembly of Quebec. Retrieved September 13, 2023.
Works cited
edit- Lemieux, Vincent, ed. (1969). Quatre élections provinciales au Québec [Four provincial elections in Quebec] (in French). Montreal: Les presses de l'Université Laval.
Further reading
edit- Saywell, John T., ed. (1963). Canadian Annual Review for 1962. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.