Sophrosyne (Ancient Greek: σωφροσύνη) is an ancient Greek concept of an ideal of excellence of character and soundness of mind, which when combined in one well-balanced individual leads to other qualities, such as temperance, moderation, prudence, purity, decorum, and self-control. An adjectival form is "sophron".[1]
It is similar to the concepts of zhōngyōng (中庸) of Chinese Confucianism[2] and sattva (सत्त्व) of Indian thought.[3]
Ancient Greek literature
editIn Ancient Greek literature, sophrosyne is considered an important quality and is sometimes contrasted with hubris. A noted example of this occurs in Homer's The Iliad. When Agamemnon decides to take the queen Briseis away from Achilles, it is seen as Agamemnon behaving with hubris and lacking sophrosyne.[4] In Homer's Odyssey, Odysseus avoids being turned into an animal by Circe the enchantress by means of a magical herb, moly (symbolizing, by some accounts, sophrosyne), given to him by Athena (Wisdom) and Hermes (Reason).[5]
Heraclitus's fragment 112 states:[6]
σωφρονεῖν ἀρετὴ μεγίστη, καὶ σοφίη ἀληθέα λέγειν καὶ ποιεῖν κατὰ φύσιν ἐπαίοντας |
Sophrosyne is the greatest virtue, and wisdom is speaking and acting the truth, paying heed to the nature of things |
Themes connected with sophrosyne and hubris figure prominently in plays of Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides. Sophrosyne is recognized as a virtue, although debased forms of it, like prudery, are criticized.[7] Sophrosyne is a theme in the play Hippolytus by Euripides, in which sophrosyne is represented by the goddess Artemis and is personified by the character Hippolytus.[1][8]: 71–123
Goddess
editThe 6th-century BCE poet Theognis of Megara mentions Sophrosyne as among the daimona that were released from Pandora's box.[9]
Plato
editSophrosyne is an important topic for Plato. It is the main subject of the dialogue Charmides, wherein several definitions are proposed but no conclusion reached; however in the dramatic context it connotes moral purity and innocence. An etymological meaning of sophrosyne as "preservation of thoughtfulness" is proposed in Cratylus 411e. Plato's view of sophrosyne is related to Pythagorean harmonia (Republic 430e−432a, 442c) and closely linked with Plato’s tripartite division of the soul: sophrosyne is the harmonious moderation of the appetitive and spirited parts of the soul by the rational part (e.g., Phaedrus 237c−238e).[10]
Aristotle
editAristotle included discussions of sophrosyne[11]: III.10–11 in his pioneering system of virtue ethics.
Aristotle believed sophrosyne described "a mean with regard to pleasures,"[11]: III.10 distinct from self-indulgence on the one hand, or perhaps anhedonia on the other. Like courage, sophrosyne is a virtue concerning our discipline of "the irrational parts of our nature" (fear, in the case of courage; desire, in the case of sophrosyne).[11]: III.10
His discussion is found in the Nicomachean Ethics Book III, chapters 10–12, and concludes in this way:
And so the appetites of temperate men (σώφρωνος) should be in harmony with their reason; for the aim of both is that which is noble: the temperate man (σώφρων) desires what he ought, and as he ought, and when he ought; and this again is what reason prescribes. This, then, may be taken as an account of sophrosynes (σωφροσύνης).[11]: III.12
As with virtue generally, sophrosyne is a sort of habit, acquired by practice.[11]: II.1 It is a state of character, not a passion or a faculty,[11]: II.5 specifically a disposition to choose the mean[11]: II.6 between excess and deficit.[11]: II.2 The mean is hard to attain, and is grasped by perception, not by reasoning.[11]: II.9
Pleasure in doing virtuous acts is a sign that one has attained a virtuous disposition.[11]: II.3 Sophrosyne is the alignment of our desires with our enlightened self-interest, such that we desire to do what is best for our own flourishing.
After Aristotle
editFor the Stoic, Zeno of Citium, sophrosyne is one of the four chief virtues.[12] Later Stoics like Musonius Rufus, Seneca, Epictetus, and Marcus Aurelius took a practical view of sophrosyne and share a definition of it as the restraint of the appetites.[4]: 228–29
Demophilus, a Pythagorean philosopher of uncertain date, wrote:[13]
Ρώμη ψυχής σωφροσύνη αύτη γαρ ψυχής απαθούς φώς εστιν |
The vigor of the soul is sophrosyne, the light of a soul free of disturbing passions. |
Cicero considered four Latin terms to translate sophrosyne: temperantia (temperance), moderatio (moderateness), modestia (modesty), and frugalitas (frugality).[14] Through the writings of Lactantius, St. Ambrose and St. Augustine, the virtue's meaning as temperance or "proper mixture" became the dominant view in subsequent Western European thought.[15]
Sophrosyne, according to St. Thomas Aquinas, is the fourth and final cardinal virtue.[16]
It is also mentioned in the work On Virtues (Greek: Περὶ ἀρετῶν) by Georgios Gemistos Plethon.
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b Euripides (1973) [428 BCE]. Hippolytos. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-507290-7.
- ^ 林之满 萧枫, ed. (2014). 流光溢彩的世界古典史. Changsha: Green Apple Data Center. p. 237.
- ^
- Curzer, H. J. (2012). Aristotle and the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 77.
- Schadé, J. P.; Wiener, N. (1966). Progress in Biocybernetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 1.
- ^ a b North, Helen (1966). Sophrosyne: Self-Knowledge and Self-Restraint in Greek Literature. Cornell Studies in Classical Philology. Vol. 35. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 9780801403187. JSTOR 10.7591/j.cttq4533.
- ^ Clarke, Bruce (1995). Allegories of Writing: The Subject of Metamorphosis. Albany: SUNY Press. p. 127. ISBN 9780791426234.
- ^ Hyland, D. A. (2008). Plato and the Question of Beauty. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. p. 105.
- ^ North, Helen F. (1947). "A Period of Opposition to Sôphrosynê in Greek Thought". Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. 78: 1–17. doi:10.2307/283479. JSTOR 283479.
- ^ Barnes, H. E. (1960). "The Hippolytus of Drama and Myth". In Sutherland, D.; Barnes, H. E. (eds.). Hippolytus in Drama and Myth. Vol. 75. Lincoln Neb. pp. 71–123.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Rademaker, A. (2005). Sophrosyne and the Rhetoric of Self-Restraint: Polysemy & Persuasive Use of an Ancient Greek Value Term. Leiden & Boston: Brill. pp. 76–78.
- ^ Peters, Francis E. (1967). Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon. New York: NYU Press. p. 179. ISBN 9780814765524.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Aristotle (1906) [c. 340 BCE]. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Peters, F.H.
- ^ Peters, F. E. (1967). Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon. New York: NYU Press. p. 180.
- ^ Sentences of Demophilus 39 = Stobaeus, Florilegium, vol. 1. Leipzig: Teubner, 1855, p. 117 (Peri Sophrosyne 42).
- ^ Cicero. Tusculan Disputations. 3.8.16.
- ^ Carr, M. F. (2012). Passionate Deliberation: Emotion, Temperance, and the Care Ethic in Clinical Moral Deliberation. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 29. ISBN 9789401005913.
- ^ Harrington, Daniel; Keenan, James (2010). Paul and Virtue Ethics. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. pp. 125–126.
Further reading
edit- Moore, Christopher (2023). The virtue of agency: Sôphrosunê and self-constitution in classical Greece. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780197663509.
- Van Tongeren, Paul (2001). "Nietzsche's revaluation of the cardinal virtues: The case of Sophrosyne" (PDF). Phronimon: Journal of the South African Society for Greek Philosophy and the Humanities. 3: 128–49.