Wikipedia

Barberton Greenstone Belt

(Redirected from S2 impact)

The Barberton Greenstone Belt is a geologic formation situated on the eastern edge of the Kaapvaal Craton in South Africa. It is known for its gold mineralisation and for its komatiites, an unusual type of ultramafic volcanic rock named after the Komati River that flows through the belt. Some of the oldest exposed rocks on Earth (greater than 3.6 Ga) are located in the Barberton Greenstone Belt of the Eswatini–Barberton areas and these contain some of the oldest traces of life on Earth, second only to the Isua Greenstone Belt of Western Greenland. The Makhonjwa Mountains make up 40% of the Baberton belt.[1] It is named after the town Barberton, Mpumalanga.

Location of the Barberton Greenstone Belt.

History and description

edit
 
Simplified map of the greenstone belt.
 
Aerial view from Landsat 7 with the Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+)

The Barberton Greenstone Belt consists of a sequence of mafic to ultramafic lavas and metasedimentary rocks emplaced and deposited between 3.5 and 3.2 Ga. The granitoid rocks were emplaced over a 500-million-year time span and can be divided into two suites: The tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) suite (emplaced approximately 3.5–3.2 Ga), and the granite–monzogranite–syenite granite (GMS) suite (emplaced approximately 3.2–3.1 Ga). The GMS suite are found over large parts of the Kaapvaal Craton and their emplacement coincides with the first stabilisation of the central parts of the craton. "The GMS suite in the Barberton granite-greenstone terrane shows very different internal and external characteristics from the earlier TTG suite. Individual plutons may cover several thousand square kilometres and these composite granitoid bodies have traditionally been referred to as batholiths, alluding to their compositionally and texturally heterogeneous nature and enormous areal extent. For the most part, the plutons appear undeformed."[2]

The Barberton area underwent two tectonic episodes of terrane accretion at about 3.5 and 3.2 Ga. Early stages of shield development are exposed in the Barberton Mountains where the continent formation first took place by magmatic accretion and tectonic amalgamation of small protocontinental blocks. Several small diachronous blocks (3.6–3.2 Ga) have been found in the area. Apparently each block represents a cycle of arc-related magmatism and sedimentation. The Hooggenoeg Formation of the Barberton Greenstone Belt is dated at 3.45 Ga. and evolved through magmatism. This crustal development phase was followed by a period of Mesoarchaean cratonic magmatism (3.1–3.0 Ga) and is marked by the formation of a large crescent-shaped, juvenile arc that was accreted onto the northern and western margins of the evolving Kaapvaal shield. Archaean greenstone belts are hypothesized to have been formed from passive margin oceanic crust that became part of an extensive subduction-undercut margin. The TTG intrusions are thought to have been formed by post-subduction magmatism when subduction was halted, perhaps by arrival of a micro-craton.

The 3.1 Ga Mpuluzi batholith in the Barberton granite–gneiss terrane is made up of granite sheets. The structurally higher parts are underlain by an anastomosing network of steeply dipping, variably deformed dikes and sheets. According to a study done by Westraat et al. (2005): "Multiple intrusive relationships and geochronological evidence suggests that granite sheeting and the assembly of the pluton occurred over a period of 3–13 million years. The spatial and temporal relationship between deformation and magma emplacement reflects episodes of incremental dilation related to deformation along the bounding shear zones and granite sheeting. The transition to the mainly subhorizontal granite sheets at higher structural levels of the tabular Mpuluzi batholith indicates the intrusion of the granites during subhorizontal regional shortening, where the reorientation of the minimum normal stress to vertical attitudes at the shallow levels of emplacement allowed for vertical dilation and subhorizontal emplacement of the granite sheets."[2]

Impact events

edit

The Barberton Greenstone Belt records impact events in 8 layers containing spherules (tiny spheres which form from condensed vapour created by the impact) dubbed S1 through S8, spanning from about 3.5 to 3.2 billion years ago,[3] which likely represent at least 4 but perhaps as many as 8 or more impact events.[4] The impactors that generated these events are thought to have been much larger than those that created the largest known still existing craters/impact structures on Earth (Vredefort and Chicxulub), with the impactors having an estimated diameter of ~20–50 kilometres (12–31 mi), with the craters generated by these impacts having an estimated diameter of 400–1,000 kilometres (250–620 mi). The Barberton deposits are thought to have been distant from the impacts.[5]

The most powerful of the impacts such as the S2 impact,[6] which dates to 3.26 billion years ago,[6] probably caused extremely strong earthquakes worldwide, megatsunamis thousands of meters high,[7][6] as well as boiling the surface of the oceans, resulting in tens of meters of global ocean evaporation. Earth would have also been plunged into darkness lasting years to decades.[6]

Barberton Greenstone Belt TTG and GMS suites

edit

The Barberton Mountain is a well preserved pre-3.0 Ga granite-greenstone terrane. The greenstone belt consists of a sequence of mafic to ultramafic lavas and metasedimentary rocks emplaced and deposited between 3.5 and 3.2 Ga. The granitoid rocks were emplaced over a 500 million year time span and can be divided into two suites. The TTG suite (emplaced approximately 3.5–3.2 Ga) contains tonalites, trondhjemites and granodiorites; and the GMS suite (emplaced approximately 3.2–3.1 Ga) includes granites, monzogranites and a small syenite–granite complex.

According to a study by Yearron et al. (2003):

"The TTGs are typically low- to medium-K, metaluminous I-type granites, Their chondrite-normalised REE patterns show two trends. The majority of plutons are LREE[a]-enriched, HREE[b]-depleted and with small or no Eu anomalies, whilst the Steynsdorp and Doornhoek plutons are relatively HREE-undepleted with significant Eu anomalies. Nd isotope analyses show that the 3.4 Ga TTGs have positive εNd values (0 to +3.7), indicative of depleted-mantle sources, similar to the oldest greenstone belt formations (the Onverwacht). In contrast, the 3.2 Ga TTGs have negative εNd, suggesting crustal or enriched-mantle input into the magmas.
Extensive granite plutons of a subsequent magmatic episode are associated with the intrusion of vast amounts of granodiorite-monzogranite-syenite GMS suites. The GMS rocks are medium- and high-K metaluminous I-typerocks. They display two dominant REE patterns. Medium-K GMS rocks (the Dalmeinand portions of Heerenveen) are LREE-enriched, HREE-depleted and have no Eu-anomalies, whereas, the high-K GMSs (Heerenveen, Mpuluzi and Boesmanskop) are relatively HREE-enriched with negative Eu anomalies. Positive and negative εNd values (−4.4 to +4.8) for the Boesmanskop Syenite suggests depleted-mantle and crystal signatures. The εNd and REE patterns, in particular, provide insights into the compositions of potential source rocks and restites for the TTG and GMS suites.
Since HREEs and Eu are readily accommodated in garnet and plagioclase, respectively, their depletion suggests the presence of these minerals in the restite. For the TTG suite, we therefore suggest a garnet-rich amphibolitic or eclogitic depleted-mantle source at a depth >40 km. This has been confirmed by experimental work constraining the stability of garnet in the trondhjemite compositions, and at magmatic temperatures,[c] to a pressure of 15.24 ± 0.5 kbar corresponding to a depth of 54.9 ± 1.8 km. In contrast, the GMS suite most probably had a plagioclase-rich, garnet-poor source that may be a mixture of depleted-mantle and crustal materials.
The two episodes of terrane accretion at ~3.5 and 3.2 Ga correspond to ages of TTG magmatism. This compressional tectonic regime, and the partial melting of greenstone-type material, suggest that basaltic amphibolites of the greenstone sequences are the source materials for the TTG suites. The likely source rocks for the GMS suite are not easily deduced, but chemistry and εNd values of the Boesmanskop syenite suggest a hybrid mantle-crustal source. This type of hybrid source might also explain the features of the monzogranitic batholiths. Close associations between syenite and monzogranites are common, particularly in post-orogenic extensional/transtensional settings. Although extensional activity has not been documented in Barberton, ~3.1 Ga strike-slip activity has. A post-orogenic thinning of the crust might explain the production of large voluminous monzogranite batholiths and the passive nature of their intrusion dynamics."[8]
 
A panoramic photograph of the Makhonjwa Mountains area.

Hooggenoeg Formation of the Barberton Greenstone Belt

edit

Some controversy exists pertaining to the origin and emplacement of Archaean felsic suites. According to a dissertation by Louzada (2003): "The upper part of the Hooggenoeg Formation[9] is characterized by ultramafic massive and pillow lavas, a trondhjemitic suite of silicified felsic intrusive and flow banded rocks, and sedimentary chert beds. Veins of felsic, chert and ultramafic material intrude the belt. The depositional environment is thought to be a shoaling shallow sea in which the Hooggenoeg Formation has been deposited in a west-block down, listric faulted, synsedimentary setting."[10][better source needed]

The Hooggenoeg Formation felsic rocks can be divided into two groups: an intrusive group of interlocking and shallow intrusive rocks, and a porphyritic group of rocks from the veins. Lavas from the upper part of the felsic unit are too altered to be assigned to one of these groups. The intrusive group is related to the tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite TTG-suite Stolzburg Pluton, which intruded along the southern margin of the Barberton Greenstone Belt. Melting of an amphibolite quartz eclogite has been suggested as a probable origin for these high-Al2O3 felsic magmas. Ultramafic rocks of the Hooggenoeg Formation were most likely not parental for the felsic rocks. Subduction processes may have played a role in the generation of the felsic rocks, but a tectonic setting for the ultramafic rocks remains uncertain. The felsic units of the Hooggenoeg Formation are very similar to those of the Panorama Formation[11] of the Early Archaean Coppin Gap greenstone belt of Western Australia (See Yilgarn Craton). Similarities in geological setting, petrography, and geochemical (trace elements in particular) characteristics suggest a possible genetic relation between the two formations and support the theory that a combined continent Vaalbara existed ~3.45 Ga.

IUGS geological heritage site

edit

In respect of the research carried out on this 'unique remnant of ancient Earth's crust', the 'Archaean Barberton Greenstone Belt' was included by the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) in its assemblage of 100 'geological heritage sites' around the world in a listing published in October 2022. The organisation defines an 'IUGS Geological Heritage Site' as 'a key place with geological elements and/or processes of international scientific relevance, used as a reference, and/or with a substantial contribution to the development of geological sciences through history.' The outcrops of the Barberton Greenstone Belt had previously been inscribed on UNESCO's list of World Heritage Sites in 2008 as 'Barbeton Makhonjwa Mountains.[12]

Although not a state or national park, it is patrolled by rangers armed with machine guns who accompany expeditions for protection against rhinos and elephants.[13]

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Low atomic numbered rare earth elements Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm (Eu)
  2. ^ High atomic numbered rare earth elements (Eu) Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu
  3. ^ typical range 700 °C to 1300 °C

References

edit
  1. ^ "Barberton Makhonjwa Mountains". UNESCO.
  2. ^ a b Westraat, J. D; Kisters, A. F. M.; Poujo, M.; Stevens, G. (2005). "Transcurrent shearing, granite sheeting and the incremental construction of the tabular 3.1 Ga Mpuluzi batholith, Barberton granite–greenstone terrane, South Africa". Journal of the Geological Society. 162 (2): 373–388. Bibcode:2005JGSoc.162..373W. doi:10.1144/0016-764904-026. S2CID 129905362.
  3. ^ Ozdemir, Seda; Schulz, Toni; Koeberl, Christian; Reimold, Wolf Uwe; Mohr‐Westheide, Tanja; Hoehnel, Desiree; Schmitt, Ralf Thomas (27 November 2017). "Early Archean spherule layers from the Barberton Greenstone Belt, South Africa: Mineralogy and geochemistry of the spherule beds in the CT 3 drill core". Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 52 (12): 2586–2631. doi:10.1111/maps.12998. ISSN 1086-9379.
  4. ^ Koeberl, Christian; Schulz, Toni; Huber, Matthew S. (2024-09-01). "Precambrian impact structures and ejecta on earth: A review". Precambrian Research. 411: 107511. doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107511.
  5. ^ Lowe, Donald R.; Byerly, Gary R. (April 2018). "The terrestrial record of Late Heavy Bombardment". New Astronomy Reviews. 81: 39–61. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2018.03.002.
  6. ^ a b c d Drabon, Nadja; Knoll, Andrew H.; Lowe, Donald R. (21 October 2024). "Effect of a giant meteorite impact on Paleoarchean surface environments and life". PNAS. 121 (44). doi:10.1073/pnas.2408721121PNAS. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
  7. ^ Norman H. Sleep; Donald R. Lowe (April 9, 2014). "Scientists reconstruct ancient impact that dwarfs dinosaur-extinction blast". American Geophysical Union. Retrieved April 22, 2019.
  8. ^ Yearron, L .M.; Clemens, J. D.; Stevens, G.; Anhaeusser, C. R. (2003). "Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of the Granitoids of the Barberton Mountain Land, South Africa" (PDF). Geophysical Research Abstracts. 5 (2639): 2639. Bibcode:2003EAEJA.....2639Y.
  9. ^ Sandsta, N.R.; Robins, B.; Furnes, H.; de Wit, M. (2011). "The origin of large varioles in flow-banded pillow lava from the Hooggenoeg Complex, Barberton Greenstone Belt, South Africa". Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology. 162 (2): 365–377. Bibcode:2011CoMP..162..365S. doi:10.1007/s00410-010-0601-4. hdl:1956/4518.
  10. ^ Louzada, K. L. (2003) "The magmatic evolution of the upper ~3450 Ma Hooggenoeg Formation, Barberton greenstone belt, Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa", Utrecht University : unpublished MSc project abstr.
  11. ^ Retallack, G.J. (2018). "The oldest known paleosol profiles on Earth: 3.46 Ga Panorama Formation, Western Australia". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 489: 230–248. Bibcode:2018PPP...489..230R. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.10.013.
  12. ^ "The First 100 IUGS Geological Heritage Sites" (PDF). IUGS International Commission on Geoheritage. IUGS. Retrieved 10 November 2022.
  13. ^ Georgina Rannard (22 October 2024). "Mega meteorite tore up seabed and boiled Earth's oceans". BBC News.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barberton_Greenstone_Belt&oldid=1258096396#Impact_events"