Wikipedia

List of lawsuits involving Tesla, Inc.

(Redirected from SEC v. Musk)

This is a partial list of lawsuits involving Tesla, Inc, the American automotive and energy company, since 2008; as of August 2023, Tesla is party to over 1,750 lawsuits,[1] and as of September 2021, it is party to 200 in China alone.[2] A significant number of the cases notably derive from the actions of the company's CEO, Elon Musk, who is also party to many of his own lawsuits.[3] TSLAQ, a loose collective of anonymous short-sellers and skeptics of Tesla and Elon Musk, regularly discusses and shares news of these lawsuits on Twitter and elsewhere.[4]

On-going

edit

Vaughn racism class action suit

edit

In 2017, Marcus Vaughn, a former Tesla assembly line worker, filed a class action lawsuit, alleging that black Tesla employees were subject to racist conduct, including "slurs, graffiti and nooses hung at their workstations."[5] Tesla responded by claiming the lawsuit was a "hotbed of misinformation."[6] In February 2024, a judge approved the class status of the approximately 5,977 black employees involved in the suit.[5]

edit
See also: Gary Gensler § Tesla and Twitter

A class-action lawsuit from August and September 2018 regarding Musk's tweets about potentially going private (In re Tesla Inc. Securities Litigation) ended in February 2023 when a jury found Musk and Tesla not liable.[7]

In October and November 2018, five derivative lawsuits were filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery against Musk and the members of Tesla's board of directors (as then constituted) in relation to statements and actions connected to the potential going private transaction. These lawsuits were stayed pending resolution of the class-action lawsuit.[8] As of March 2024, two of these cases are still unresolved.[9][10]

A lawsuit filed in March 2021 alleges that Musk violated his fiduciary duty to Tesla by continuing to send "erratic" tweets in violation of the SEC settlement, and that the board is failing to control Musk.[11][12] The case was also stayed pending resolution of the class-action lawsuit.[13] As of March 2024, the case is unresolved.[14]

Whistleblower allegations and retaliation

edit

In November 2020, former Tesla employee Steven Henkes filed a lawsuit alleging he was fired by Tesla in retaliation for raising safety concerns about "unacceptable fire risks" in the company's solar installations.[15] Tesla solar installations caught fire at seven Walmart locations, as well as an Amazon warehouse.[15][16] The SEC confirmed in September 2021 that it has an active and ongoing investigation related to the whistleblower complaint Henkes made in 2019.[17] As of March 2024, the case is unresolved.[18][19]

Agreement misrepresented as loan

edit

A Tesla Solar customer alleged in a 2020 filing that the company engaged in "bait-and-switch financing" for reporting his solar-financing agreement as "a massive loan" to credit agencies, therefore upending the customer's credit rating.[20] In April 2021, the case was ordered to arbitration.[21] As of May 2023, the case was still in arbitration.[21]

Texas police complaint

edit

In September 2021, five police officers submitted a complaint against in part Tesla for a crash involving Autopilot that left them badly injured. The plaintiffs' stated aim is to "force Tesla to publicly acknowledge and immediately correct the known defects inherent in its Autopilot [capability]".[22] As of March 2024, the next trial milestone is August 5, 2024.[23]

Sexual harassment at Fremont facility cases

edit

In December 2021, six women working at the Fremont factory and service center sued the company over sexual harassment.[24] As of March 2024, the cases are unresolved.[25]

Fair Employment and Housing racism suit

edit

In February 2022, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) sued Tesla for "discriminating against its Black workers" after it "received hundreds of complaints from Tesla workers" and "found evidence that Tesla's Fremont factory is a racially segregated workplace where Black workers are subjected to racial slurs and discriminated against in job assignments, discipline, pay and promotion creating a hostile work environment". One Black worker complained of hearing racial slurs as often as 50 to 100 times per day. In a February 2022 blog post, Tesla responded to the lawsuit and stated that they "will be asking the court to pause the case and take other steps to ensure that facts and evidence will be heard."[26][27]

In August 2022, California's Office of Administrative Law declined to review a petition from Tesla claiming that DFEH failed to conduct a full investigation prior to filing the lawsuit.[28] As of March 2024, the case is unresolved.[29]

Autopilot suits

edit
See also: Tesla Autopilot § Fatal crashes

Litigation is ongoing in at least eight cases involving the use of Tesla Autopilot during a fatal or "otherwise serious" crash.[30] In particular, the cases of Jeremy Banner and Jenna Monet deal with fatal incidents.[31] As of November 2023, the Banner case is expected to go to trial in 2024.[32] As of March 2024, the court case regarding Monet is unresolved.[33]

Individual racism lawsuit

edit

In February 2022, litigation was filed by Marc Cage who alleged racial-based harassment from his Tesla factory coworkers.[34] As of March 2024, the case is stayed, pending arbitration.[35]

Sudden unintended braking class action

edit

In August 2022, a consumer class action was filed alleging that the Autopilot system in Tesla cars "contains a hazardous defect which causes the vehicle to suddenly and unintentionally brake", a phenomenon dubbed phantom braking.[36][37] As of March 2024, the case is unresolved.[38]

Deceptive Autopilot and Full Self-Driving advertising

edit

In September 2022, a proposed class action federal lawsuit was filed against Tesla for Elon Musk allegedly misleading customers "who since 2016 bought or leased Tesla vehicles with Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features" with his predictions that Teslas would soon be fully autonomous cars.[39] Over 300,000 vehicles were recalled due to being unsafe around intersections.[40] As of March 2024, the case is unresolved.[41]

California Civil Rights Department suit

edit

The California Civil Rights Department filed a suit in 2022 alleging "a pattern of racial harassment and bias" at the Tesla Fremont factory. As of April 2023, the Department is also conducting a probe of the factory based on a 2021 complaint and claims that Tesla has been obstructing the investigation.[42] As of March 2024, the case is unresolved.[43]

2019 garage accident lawsuit

edit

In May 2019 a Tesla owner, filed a lawsuit against Tesla, after her 2-year old son performed an unintended acceleration in her Model X and pinned her against the wall of her garage. Harcourt, who was 8 months pregnant at the time, sustained multiple broken bones and went into premature labor. The lawsuit alleges that "the company knew the Model X had issues and that Tesla was negligent in designing the car without proper sensors and other safety features."[44][45]

xAI resource and talent diversion

edit

In June 2024, Tesla shareholders accused Elon Musk and the company’s board of knowingly diverting talent and resources away from the company and directing it toward Musk’s rival artificial intelligence company, xAI, thereby breaching their fiduciary duty to Tesla.[46][47] More than a dozen Tesla employees left to work for xAI. Musk has controversially proposed that Tesla invest in xAI.[48]

Resolved

edit

Fisker Automotive

edit

On April 14, 2008, Tesla sued Fisker Automotive, alleging that Henrik Fisker "stole design ideas and confidential information related to the design of hybrid and electric cars" and was using that information to develop the Fisker Karma. Tesla had hired Fisker Coachbuild to design the WhiteStar sedan, but rejected the design that Musk considered "substandard".[49][50] On November 3, 2008, Fisker Automotive Inc. issued a press release indicating that an arbitrator had issued an interim award finding in Fisker's favor on all claims.[51]

Top Gear review

edit

Tesla unsuccessfully sued British television show Top Gear for its 2008 review of the Tesla Roadster (2008) in which Jeremy Clarkson could be seen driving one around the Top Gear test track, complaining about a range of only 55 mi (89 km), before showing workers pushing it into the garage, supposedly out of charge. Tesla filed a lawsuit against the BBC for libel and malicious falsehood, claiming that two cars were provided and that at any point, at least one was ready to drive. The Top Gear producers claimed that the range of 55 mi was calculated by Tesla itself and supplied to Top Gear as an estimate of the car's range when driven hard on a track.[52] In addition, Tesla said that neither car ever dropped below 25% charge, and that the scene was staged.[53][54][55][56] However, Top Gear frequently stages scenes for comedic effect, for example by showing Jeremy Clarkson having to refuel the Jaguar XJS three times during the review of it.[57] The High Court in London rejected Tesla's libel claim.[58] The falsehood claims were later struck out.[59]

Founder dispute

edit

The company founding was the subject of a lawsuit that was later dropped after an out-of-court settlement.[60][61] On May 26, 2009, Eberhard filed suit against Tesla and Musk for slander, libel and breach of contract.[62] Musk wrote a lengthy blog post that included original source documents, including emails between senior executives and other artifacts attempting to demonstrate that Eberhard was fired by Tesla's unanimous board of directors.[63] A judge struck down Eberhard's claim that he was one of only two company founders.[64] Tesla said in a statement that the ruling is "consistent with Tesla's belief in a team of founders, including the company's current CEO and Product Architect Elon Musk, and Chief Technology Officer JB Straubel, who were both fundamental to the creation of Tesla from inception."[65] Eberhard withdrew the case[66] and the parties reached a final settlement. One public provision said that the parties will consider Eberhard, Musk, Straubel, Tarpenning and Wright to be the five co-founders. Eberhard issued a statement about Musk's foundational role in the company: "As a co-founder of the company, Elon's contributions to Tesla have been extraordinary."[67]

Ecotricity agreement

edit

In early 2014, Tesla reportedly tried to break the exclusivity agreement their charging partner in the UK had for locations along the UK's highways and tried to "blacken Ecotricity's name with politicians and the media".[68] Ecotricity replied by taking an injunction against them.[69][70] The dispute was resolved out of court.[71]

Securities litigation relating to SolarCity's financial statements and guidance

edit

On March 28, 2014, a purported stockholder class action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against SolarCity and two of its officers. The complaint alleges violations of federal securities laws and seeks unspecified compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of SolarCity's securities from March 6, 2013, to March 18, 2014. On March 8, 2018, the Court upheld the District Court ruling of dismissal and judgment in Tesla's favor. The case is concluded.[8]

Tesla was also party to a lawsuit filed in July 2018, alleging that SolarCity improperly fired three employees who blew the whistle on fraudulent sales records at the company.[72] On June 5, 2020, the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice.[73]

Illegal workers suit

edit

The Mercury News in 2016 investigated the use of foreign construction workers to build Tesla's paint shop at Tesla Factory. A whistleblower federal lawsuit was filed, which was unsealed in the summer of 2017. The suit alleged that Tesla and other major automakers such as Mercedes-Benz, BMW and Volkswagen, illegally used foreign construction workers to build their U.S. factories. Court documents and the journalistic investigation showed that at least 140 foreign workers worked on the factory expansion, some of whom had questionable work visas, for as little as five dollars per hour. The workers came mainly from Eastern Europe on "suspect visas hired through subcontractors."[74]

On March 20, 2019, a decision by the United States District Court in San Jose dismissed most claims.[75] The parties entered into a confidential settlement on January 17, 2020, and as of August 2022, the court retained jurisdiction to enforce compliance of the terms.[76]

Singapore tax surcharge

edit

In early March 2016, a report by Stuff magazine said that test performed by VICOM, Ltd on behalf of Singapore's Land Transport Authority had found a 2014 Tesla Model S to be consuming 444 Wh/km (0.715 kW⋅h/mi),[77][78] which was greater than the 236 watt-hours per kilometre (0.38 kW⋅h/mi) reported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)[79] and the 181 watt-hours per kilometre (0.291 kW⋅h/mi) reported by Tesla.[80] As a result, a carbon surcharge of S$15,000 (US$10,900 at March 2016 exchange rate) was imposed on the Model S, making Singapore the only country in the world to impose an environmental surcharge on a fully electric car.[81] The Land Transport Authority justified this by stating that it had to "account for CO2 emissions during the electricity generation process" and therefore "a grid emission factor of 0.5g/watt-hour was also applied to the electric energy consumption",[82] however Tesla countered that when the energy used to extract, refine, and distribute gasoline was taken into account, the Model S produces approximately one-third the CO2 of an equivalent gasoline-powered vehicle.[80]

Later that month, the Land Transport Authority released a statement stating that they and the VICOM Emission Test Laboratory will be working with Tesla engineers to review the test,[83] and a Tesla statement indicated that the discussions were "positive" and that they were confident of a quick resolution.[80]

As of February 2021, consumers can order a new Tesla to be imported into Singapore, for delivery in mid-2021, with no mention of a surcharge.[84][85] As of October 2021, Teslas sold in Singapore increased ten-fold to 487 in the third quarter, compared to just 50 in the first half of 2021.[86]

Workplace harassment

edit

One female engineer at Tesla filed a lawsuit in 2016 describing a culture of "pervasive harassment".[87] The lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice in 2019.[88]

Corporate litigation relating to the SolarCity acquisition

edit

Between September 1, 2016, and October 5, 2016, seven lawsuits were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware challenging Tesla's acquisition of SolarCity. In October 2016, the Court consolidated the actions and appointed a lead plaintiff. The plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that the Tesla board of directors as then constituted breached their fiduciary duties in approving the acquisition and that certain individuals would be unjustly enriched by the acquisition.[89] The complaint asserts both derivative claims and direct claims on behalf of a purported class and seeks, among other relief, $13 billion from Elon Musk.[90]

The acquisition was approved by Tesla and SolarCity's stockholders on November 17, 2016[91] and the merger closed on November 21, 2016. On October 24, 2019, the transcripts of video depositions of Elon Musk and other SolarCity board members became widely available.[92] The trial was held in July 2021.[93] On October 22, 2021, the lawsuit was limited to a derivative lawsuit and the direct claims against Musk were dismissed.[94] The Delaware Court of Chancery ruled in Musk's favor in April 2022,[95] and its ruling was upheld by the Delaware Supreme Court in June 2023.[96]

SEC investigations in 2016 regarding GAAP reporting

edit

An SEC investigation in October 2016 about Tesla's use of non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) reporting closed "without further action"; Tesla switched to GAAP-reporting in October 2016.[97]

Autopilot 2 class-action lawsuit

edit

On April 19, 2017, Tesla owners filed a class-action lawsuit due to Tesla exaggerating the capabilities of its Autopilot 2 to consumers.[98] The lawsuit claimed that "buyers of the affected vehicles have become beta testers of half-baked software that renders Tesla vehicles dangerous if engaged".[99] Tesla attacked the lawsuit as a "disingenuous attempt to secure attorney's fees posing as a legitimate legal action".[100]

On May 19, 2018, Tesla reached an agreement to settle the class-action lawsuit. Under the agreement, class members, who paid to get the Autopilot upgrade between 2016 and 2017, will receive between US$20 and $280 in compensation. Tesla has agreed to place more than $5 million into a settlement fund, which will also cover attorney fees. The proposed settlement does not mention the safety allegations but focuses on the delay in making the promised features available to consumers.[101] The agreement was approved in November 2018.[102]

Union busting attempts

edit

On April 19, 2017, Tesla factory workers filed unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board, alleging that Tesla uses "illegal surveillance, coercion, intimidation and prevention of worker communications [...] in an effort to prevent or otherwise hinder unionization of the Fremont factory."[103][104]

According to CNBC, "the United Automobile Workers (UAW) union filed four separate charges with the National Labor Relations Board alleging that [Tesla] has illegally surveilled and coerced workers attempting to distribute information about the union drive."[105] On February 10, 2017, three Tesla employees allegedly were passing out literature to initiate organizing union efforts. The literature pointed to working conditions, the company's confidentiality agreement and employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act. The UAW's charges allege that Tesla illegally told employees that they could not pass out any literature unless it was approved by the company.[105]

The Fremont plant has been unionized in the past, both when owned by General Motors (GM), and later by the NUMMI partnership of GM and Toyota. While under UAW oversight, the plant closed once in 1982 (GM) and again in 2010 (NUMMI partnership) .[106][107]

In May 2018, the United Auto Workers union filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board, seeking a federal investigation against Tesla for CEO Elon Musk's tweet apparently threatening worker stock options if they joined a union. Tesla responded that other car makers don't offer such stock options to union workers.[108][109] Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison chastised Musk for "threats" of unlawful retaliation and presented a list of questions on union activities and worker safety records, asking for a response by June 15.[110]

In September 2019, a California judge ruled that 12 actions by Musk and other Tesla executives violated labor laws in 2017 and 2018 when they sabotaged employee attempts to unionize.[111][112]

Securities litigation relating to production of Model 3 vehicles

edit

In 2017, a lawsuit alleged Tesla made materially false and misleading statements regarding its preparedness to produce Model 3 vehicles.[8] The U.S. Department of Justice also began an investigation in 2018 into whether Tesla misled investors and misstated production figures about its Model 3 car.[113] The lawsuit was dismissed in Tesla's favor in March 2019.[114]

Reselling "lemon" cars

edit

In February 2018, Tesla was accused of reselling defective "lemon" cars in the U.S.; Tesla denied the claim.[115] On December 11, 2018, the case was ordered to arbitration.[116] In March 2022, the case was dismissed by the court.[117] In Norway in 2018, Tesla buyers have gone to court with the claim that they had been sold cars with defects, and Tesla bought back the car.[118]

Litigation relating to 2018 CEO performance award

edit

In April 2018, Tesla shareholder Richard Tornetta brought a lawsuit Tornetta v. Musk, et al in Delaware requesting that Musk's $55 billion pay package from Tesla be rescinded. In January 2024, Judge Kathaleen McCormick agreed.[119] McCormick called the compensation granted by the company's board "an unfathomable sum" that was unfair to shareholders. In response to the ruling, Musk posted on X: "Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware."[120] In June 2024, shareholders approved reincorporating Tesla in Texas and reapproved Musk's compensation.[121]

edit

In May 2018, it was reported that Tesla had for five[122] or six[123] years been using other people's copyrighted software unlawfully, specifically engaging in GPL violations. The Software Freedom Conservancy reportedly alerted Tesla to the issue repeatedly, but only in 2018 did Tesla begin to remedy its non-compliance with the software's license terms.[123][124][122]

Martin Tripp leak and hacking

edit

In June 2018, Tesla employee Martin Tripp leaked information that Tesla was scrapping or reworking up to 40% of its raw materials at the Nevada Gigafactory.[125] Tripp was fired after allegedly confessing.[126] On June 20, 2018, Tesla filed a civil lawsuit in Nevada against Tripp, accusing him of hacking the automaker and supplying sensitive information to unnamed third parties.[126] Tripp then filed a lawsuit against Tesla and claimed Tesla's Security team gave police a false tip that he was planning a mass shooting at the Nevada factory.[127][128] By June 27, 2018, Tesla had been granted subpoenas compelling several companies that may be storing data for the former employee, including Apple, Microsoft, Google, Facebook and Dropbox to surrender any such data.[129] Also in late June 2018, the ex-employee reacted by attempting to crowd-fund $500,000 for his legal defense and counter-suit.[130] The court ruled in Tesla's favor on September 17, 2020.[131][132]

Whistleblower allegations and retaliation

edit

In June 2018, former Tesla high-level safety official Carlos Ramirez sued the company for failing to treat injured workers and misclassifying worker injuries to avoid reporting them to authorities.[133][134] Ramirez alleged that he was fired by Tesla in retaliation for raising concerns about these practices.[134] In October 2018, the case was ordered to arbitration, and the case was closed in August 2021.[135][136]

In August 2018, former Tesla employee Karl Hansen filed a whistleblower complaint with the SEC alleging that Tesla failed to disclose an alleged drug trafficking ring at the Nevada Gigafactory "involving the sale of significant quantities of cocaine and possibly crystal methamphetamine" for a Mexican drug cartel.[137] Hansen also accused Tesla of spying on employees and hiding the theft of $37 million worth of copper and other raw materials.[138] Hansen alleged that he was retaliated against and wrongfully terminated by Tesla for raising these issues internally.[138] In 2019, Hansen filed a lawsuit related to these allegations;[139] in 2020, the judged ordered the case to arbitration.[140] In June 2022, the arbitrator filed an unopposed motion with the court stating Hansen "has failed to establish the claims...Accordingly his claims are denied, and he shall take nothing".[141]

In 2019, Lynn Thompson sued Tesla for terminating his security contract after he reported the theft of US$37 million worth of copper and other raw materials to local authorities.[142][143] In 2020, the case was stayed pending arbitration.[144] In February 2024, the case was dismissed with prejudice.[145]

Investigation and settlement by DOJ and SEC of Musk "funding secured" tweet

edit
 
 Elon Musk Twitter
@elonmusk

Am considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured.

7 Aug 2018[146]

 
 Elon Musk Twitter
@elonmusk

Shareholders could either to sell at 420 or hold shares & go private

7 Aug 2018[147]

In September 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) began investigating Tesla based on a tweet sent out by Elon Musk. In the tweet, Musk stated that he was "considering taking Tesla private", and that he had "funding secured" to complete the deal.[148] Musk's announcement came as a surprise to shareholders, and consequently the company's stock price rose by almost 11 percent; 17 days later, Musk said the proposal was dead.[149]

DOJ investigators requested company documents in September related to Musk's announcement, and the company complied with the requests.[150] The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) launched its own investigation into Tesla and Musk as well. The volatile stock price movement resulted in multiple shareholder lawsuits.[150]

On October 16, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a final judgment approving the terms of a settlement filed with the Court on September 29, 2018, in connection with the actions taken by the SEC relating to Musk's prior statement that he was considering taking Tesla private. Without admitting or denying any of the SEC's allegations, and with no restriction on Musk's ability to serve as an officer or director on the board (other than as its chair), among other things, Tesla and Musk paid civil penalties of $20 million each and agreed that an independent director will serve as chair of the board for at least three years.[8]

Shareholder lawsuit regarding Musk "funding secured" tweet

edit

Between August 10, 2018, and September 6, 2018, nine purported stockholder class actions were filed against Tesla and Elon Musk in connection with Elon Musk's August 7, 2018, Twitter post that he was considering taking Tesla private. All of the suits were consolidated into a class-action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.[151] The lawsuit asserted claims for violations of federal securities laws related to Mr. Musk's statement and seek unspecified compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of Tesla's securities. In February 2023, the jury found Musk and Tesla not liable.[7]

Employee theft of Autopilot source code

edit

In 2019 Tesla filed a lawsuit against a named employee alleging that the employee who had worked for Tesla for two years had copied the source code of the Tesla Autopilot before joining a competing startup. In April 2021 Tesla settled the lawsuit for an undisclosed payment from the former employee.[152]

Autopilot fatality suits

edit
See also: Tesla Autopilot § Fatal crashes

In May 2019, a civil lawsuit was filed regarding the death of Apple engineer Walter Huang while driving using Autopilot in 2018.[153] The case was settled in April 2024 before it went to trial.[154] It is the first time Tesla has settled a case involving Autopilot.[155]

Battery throttling lawsuits

edit

In August 2019, a class action lawsuit was filed in Northern California, claiming that a 2019 over-the-air software update throttled the Model S battery life, some by as much as 40 miles.[156] On December 7, 2020, Tesla settled the suit for $1.5 million.[157]

In April 2021, a Norwegian judge found Tesla guilty of throttling charging speed in a similar suit, after they failed to respond to the lawsuit. The 30 customers who were part of the lawsuit were awarded 136,000 Norwegian kroner each ($16,000).[158][159]

Child labor lawsuit

edit
This section is an excerpt from International Rights Advocates v. Apple, Microsoft, Dell, Tesla.[edit]
International Rights Advocates, Inc. filed an injunctive relief and damages class-action lawsuit against Apple, Microsoft, Dell, and Tesla in December 2019.[160] The plaintiff was representing fourteen Congolese parents and children seeking relief and damage fees for these companies aiding and abetting the use of young children in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) cobalt mining industry.[161] The plaintiff also pursued relief on the common law basis of negligent supervision, enrichment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.[160] In November 2021, a federal judge dismissed the suit, ruling, among other things, that there was no causal relationship between the companies and the individuals' injuries.[162] In March 2024, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that the plaintiffs had standing for the damages claims, but affirmed the dismissal because of failure to state a claim.
edit

On June 17, 2020, a Detroit pension fund filed a derivative action against the Tesla board members.[163][164] The lawsuit claims the board members have consistently awarded themselves unfair and excessive compensation from 2017 to 2020.[164] In July 2023, the directors denied wrongdoing and settled the lawsuit by agreeing to return $735 million to the company, besides consenting to forgo compensation for the years 2021 through 2023.[165]

Berry discrimination case

edit

In July 2021, former employee Melvin Berry was awarded $1 million in his discrimination case in arbitration against Tesla. Supervisors had referred to Berry using a racial slur, and retaliated against him when he complained.[166][167]

Full-Self Driving claim

edit

In August 2021, a Tesla owner filed a complaint that Tesla "fraudulently concealed its engineering failures" in regards to its beta Full Self-Driving software and falsely represented the capabilities of the product.[168] As of September 2022, the case is closed.[169]

Diaz discrimination case

edit
Main article: Owen Diaz vs. Tesla

In October 2021 a jury verdict in the Owen Diaz vs. Tesla trial awarded the plaintiff $137 million in damages after he faced racial harassment at Tesla's Fremont facility during 2015–2016.[170][171]

In April 2022, federal judge William Orrick upheld the jury finding of Tesla's liability but reduced the award to $15 million. Tesla had sought to limit the amount to $600,000.[172]

In April 2023, a jury in the newest retrial reduced the total award to $175,000 in damages for emotional distress, and $3 million in punitive damages.[173]

Solar roof hikes class-action

edit

In 2021, Tesla Solar Roof customers who had signed contracts with the company sued after they were later presented with price hikes and delays. Following the court's consolidation of the individual cases, Tesla created a program offering to return the prices to their original amounts to those affected.[174][175] In 2023, Tesla settled the lawsuit for $6 million.[176]

Individual racism lawsuit

edit

In February 2022, litigation was filed by Kaylen Barker alleging racial-based harassment from her Tesla factory coworkers.[34] In May 2022, Barker requested dismissal of the case, which was granted.[177]

"Whompy wheels" lawsuit

edit

In February 2022, a lawsuit was filed against Tesla regarding a fatality involving suspension breakage (so-called "whompy wheels").[178][179] The lawsuit follows a Tesla recall in China due to breakages of front and rear suspension linkages and ball joints, noting that the same components are used in all Tesla models sold worldwide.[180] Tesla had recently claimed in a letter to the NHTSA that "the root cause of the issue is driver abuse... uniquely severe in the China market."[181] In March 2022, the case was dismissed.[182]

Dogecoin racketeering lawsuit

edit

In June 2022, Musk, Tesla, and other companies led by him were listed as defendants in a class action lawsuit claiming they participated in a pyramid scheme around the price of Dogecoin. Damages were listed at $258 billion.[183][184] In an amended complaint in June 2023, the plaintiffs additionally accused Musk of insider trading, when he sold Dogecoin worth $124 million in April shortly after he temporarily replaced the Twitter logo with the Shiba Inu graphic associated with Dogecoin, which caused a 30 percent increase in the cryptocurrency.[185] Judge Alvin Hellerstein dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice in August 2024, writing that no reasonable investor could depend on Musk's tweets to file a securities fraud claim, adding that it was "not possible to understand" the insider trading and market manipulation allegations.[186][187]

"Right to repair" lawsuits

edit

In March 2023, a class action antitrust lawsuit was filed against Tesla by Virginia M. Lambrix in San Francisco, California, alleging that the company unlawfully monopolized the market for maintenance and repair of its vehicles in violation of the Sherman Act and California antitrust law, as a result of which owners were "forced to pay supracompetitive prices and suffer exorbitant wait times" for maintenance services and repair parts.[188][189] The lawsuit was later combined with four other similar suits.[190][191]

While six out of eight alleged antitrust violations were dismissed, in June 2024 US District Judge Trina Thompson allowed two claims to proceed, including alleged violations of California’s Cartwright Act and Unfair Competition Law (UCL), with the court finding evidence of a repairs monopoly in Tesla's designing of its vehicles to require diagnostic and software updates that only the company could provide, and evidence of a parts monopoly in Tesla's restricting original equipment manufacturers from selling "to anyone other than Tesla."[190][191]

Privacy intrusion allegations

edit

In April 2023, a Tesla owner filed a lawsuit following reports that Tesla employees shared "highly invasive videos and images recorded by customers' car cameras" with one another.[192] In October 2023, the case was ordered to arbitration and closed.[193][194]

Misrepresented EV range suit

edit

In August 2023, three Tesla drivers filed a class action lawsuit against Tesla, claiming that the company "grossly overvalued how far the cars could travel on a single battery charge."[195] In March 2024, the case was sent to arbitration.[196]

Hazardous waste disposal lawsuit

edit

In January 2024, Tesla agreed to pay $1.3 million in civil penalties and $200,000 to reimburse investigation costs for the alleged illegal disposal of hazardous waste in 25 counties in California. Tesla also agreed to train its employees on hazardous waste disposal and to have 10 percent of Tesla's facilities audited for waste disposal for the next 5 years.[197][198]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ "Tesla, Inc". Plainsite. Archived from the original on December 21, 2021. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  2. ^ Pandaily (September 28, 2021). "Tesla Issues Comment on Its Suing Model S Owner for Infringing Reputation". Pandaily. Archived from the original on September 29, 2021. Retrieved September 29, 2021.
  3. ^ Dugan, Kevin T. (September 2, 2022). "Elon Musk Has So Many Lawsuits They're Teaching a Whole Class in Law School". Intelligencer. Archived from the original on November 14, 2022. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
  4. ^ "Must Reads: The crowd-sourced, social media swarm that is betting Tesla will crash and burn". Los Angeles Times. April 8, 2019. Archived from the original on November 30, 2019. Retrieved September 12, 2020.
  5. ^ a b "Tesla must face race bias class action by 6,000 Black U.S. workers". CNBC. February 29, 2024. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
  6. ^ "Hotbed of Misinformation". Tesla. Retrieved March 9, 2024.
  7. ^ a b Godoy, Jody; Jin, Hyunjoo (February 3, 2023). "Tesla's Elon Musk found not liable in trial over 2018 'funding secured' tweets". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 4, 2023. Retrieved February 4, 2023.
  8. ^ a b c d "Tesla 10-K Files with SEC". sec.gov. February 19, 2019. Archived from the original on March 1, 2019. Retrieved March 3, 2019.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  9. ^ "Docket Report Results - Not an Official Document. Case ID: 2018-0749 - ZACHARY ELTON VS. ELON MUSK". courtconnect.courts.delaware.gov. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  10. ^ "Docket Report Results - Not an Official Document. Case ID: 2018-0823 - DORIS SHENWICK TRUST VS. ELON MUSK". courtconnect.courts.delaware.gov. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  11. ^ "Elon Musk, Tesla board sued in lawsuit alleging 'erratic' tweets violate fiduciary duty". TechCrunch. March 12, 2021. Archived from the original on March 4, 2023. Retrieved April 9, 2021.
  12. ^ "Musk, Tesla Board Sued Over Tweeting in Violation of SEC Deal (2)". news.bloomberglaw.com. Archived from the original on March 12, 2021. Retrieved April 9, 2021.
  13. ^ CHASE GHARRITY v. ELON MUSK, KIMBAL MUSK, ANTONIO J. GRACIAS, BRAD W. BUSS, ROBYN M. DENHOLM, IRA EHRENPREIS, LARRY ELLISON, STEVE JURVETSON, HIROMICHI MIZUNO, JAMES MURDOCH, LINDA JOHNSON RICE, and KATHLEEN WILSON- THOMPSON (Delaware Court of Chancery April 2, 2021), Text.
  14. ^ "Docket Report Results - Not an Official Document. Case ID: 2021-0199 - Chase Gharrity v. Elon Musk". courtconnect.courts.delaware.gov. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  15. ^ a b Kolodny, Lora (March 22, 2021). "Tesla whistleblower complaint about solar fires is part of evidence in federal safety investigation". CNBC. Archived from the original on March 22, 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
  16. ^ Kolodny, Lora (August 24, 2019). "Tesla solar panels caught fire at an Amazon warehouse in 2018". CNBC. Archived from the original on March 22, 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
  17. ^ Jin, Hyunjoo; Prentice, Chris (December 7, 2021). "Exclusive: SEC probes Tesla over whistleblower claims on solar panel defects". Reuters. Archived from the original on December 30, 2021. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
  18. ^ "Henkes v. Tesla Energy, Inc, Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. RG20080233". PlainSite. September 9, 2021. Archived from the original on August 8, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2022.
  19. ^ "Alameda eCourt Public Portal: RG20080233 Henkes VS Telsa Energy, Inc Civil Unlimited (Wrongful Termination)". eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov. March 13, 2024. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  20. ^ "Tesla Customer Sues Over Solar-Panel Deal Being Reported as Loan". Bloomberg.com. October 15, 2020. Archived from the original on April 22, 2021. Retrieved April 22, 2021.
  21. ^ a b "Olivier Chaine v. Tesla Energy Operation, Inc. et al Court Docket Sheet". DocketBird. April 8, 2021. Archived from the original on April 22, 2021. Retrieved April 22, 2021.
  22. ^ "Lawsuit filed against Tesla after accident that injured 5 police officers". KPRC. September 27, 2021. Archived from the original on September 27, 2021. Retrieved September 28, 2021.
  23. ^ "202162207 - FIELDS, DALTON vs. TESLA INC (Court 080)". www.hcdistrictclerk.com. March 13, 2024. Retrieved March 13, 2024. Next/Last Setting Date: 8/5/2024
  24. ^ Siddiqui, Faiz (December 14, 2021). "Six Tesla workers file additional lawsuits alleging sexual harassment". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  25. ^ "Alameda eCourt Public Portal: 21CV004040 CURRAN vs TESLA, INC Civil Unlimited (Other Employment Complaint Case)". eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov. March 13, 2024. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  26. ^ "California Sues Tesla, Alleging Racial Discrimination and Harassment — Justia News — February 10, 2022". news.justia.com. February 10, 2022. Archived from the original on February 11, 2022. Retrieved February 11, 2022.
  27. ^ Hull, Dana (February 10, 2022). "California says it's suing Tesla for 'severe' racism at factory". Al Jazeera. Bloomberg. Archived from the original on February 11, 2022. Retrieved February 12, 2022.
  28. ^ Wiessner, Daniel (August 22, 2022). "Tesla loses challenge to California agency suing for race bias". Reuters. Archived from the original on August 22, 2022. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
  29. ^ "Alameda eCourt Public Portal; Case 22CV006830; DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING, AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA vs TESLA, INC". Superior Court of Alameda County Public Portal. Retrieved March 29, 2024.
  30. ^ "Lawsuits test Tesla claim that drivers are solely responsible for crashes". Washington Post. April 28, 2024. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  31. ^ Hull, Dana (February 24, 2022). "Tesla's Many Dockets of Litigation Keep Lawyers and Judges Busy". Insurance Journal. Archived from the original on March 3, 2022. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
  32. ^ Spencer • •, Terry (November 23, 2023). "Lawsuit blaming Tesla's Autopilot for South Florida driver's death can go to trial, judge rules". NBC 6 South Florida. Retrieved March 26, 2024.
  33. ^ "5:22-cv-00681-EJD Monet v. Tesla, Inc". ecf.cand.uscourts.gov. March 14, 2024. Retrieved March 26, 2024.
  34. ^ a b Hull, Dana (February 24, 2022). "Tesla's Many Dockets of Litigation Keep Lawyers and Judges Busy". Insurance Journal. Archived from the original on March 3, 2022. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
  35. ^ "Alameda eCourt Public Portal: 22CV007293 CAGE vs TESLA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION Civil Unlimited (Wrongful Termination)". eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov. March 4, 2024. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  36. ^ "Law.com Radar". www.law.com. Archived from the original on August 29, 2022. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
  37. ^ Hals, Tom; Jin, Hyunjoo; Hals, Tom (August 29, 2022). "Tesla hit with proposed class action over phantom braking issue". Reuters. Archived from the original on September 9, 2022. Retrieved September 9, 2022.
  38. ^ "PACER | PACER Case Locator: Pruitt v. United National Insurance Co. Case number 3:2022cv04908. Court: Louisiana Western District Court. Date Filed: 08/26/2022". pcl.uscourts.gov. March 13, 2024. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  39. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (September 14, 2022). "Tesla is sued by drivers over alleged false Autopilot, Full Self-Driving claims". Reuters. Archived from the original on September 15, 2022. Retrieved September 15, 2022.
  40. ^ Paul, Kari (February 28, 2023). "Elon Musk overstated Tesla's autopilot and self-driving tech, new lawsuit says". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved February 28, 2023.
  41. ^ "PACER | PACER Case Locator. Matsko v. Tesla, Inc., et al. Case: 3:2022cv05240. Court: California Northern District Court. Filed: 09/14/2022". pcl.uscourts.gov. March 13, 2024. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  42. ^ "Tesla Obstructed Probe of Worker Discrimination, California Says". Bloomberg.com. April 13, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
  43. ^ "Case 22CV018292 IN THE MATTER OF: CALIFORNIA CIVIL RIGHTS DEPARTMENT". Superior Court of Alameda County Public Portal. Retrieved March 29, 2024.
  44. ^ Lopez, Linette. "New lawsuit against Tesla alleges that a Model X pinned a pregnant woman against a wall, breaking her bones and sending her into premature labor". Business Insider. Retrieved May 1, 2024.
  45. ^ "Harcourt v Tesla | PDF". Scribd. Retrieved May 1, 2024.
  46. ^ O'Kane, Rebecca Bellan, Sean (June 13, 2024). "Tesla shareholders sue Musk for starting competing AI company". TechCrunch. Retrieved June 14, 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  47. ^ Bobrowsky, Megan. "How Elon Musk Is Using His Empire to Kickstart xAI". wsj.com/. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 11, 2024.
  48. ^ Lambert, Fred. "Elon Musk continues to siphon Tesla talent to train xAI's Grok". electrek. electrek.co.
  49. ^ Korzeniewski, Jeremy (April 15, 2008). "Tesla files suit against Fisker Automotive". Autoblog.com. Archived from the original on April 21, 2015. Retrieved April 12, 2015.
  50. ^ Migliore, Greg (April 16, 2008). "Tesla sues Fisker, alleges theft of trade secrets". AutoWeek. Archived from the original on May 21, 2008. Retrieved April 16, 2008.
  51. ^ LaMonica, Martin (November 4, 2008). "Tesla Motors loses trade secrets case against Fisker". CNET News. Archived from the original on October 26, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2009.
  52. ^ Vaughan, Adam (March 30, 2011). "Tesla sues Top Gear over 'faked' electric car race". The Guardian. UK. Archived from the original on June 19, 2018. Retrieved June 19, 2018.
  53. ^ "Tesla sues Top Gear for libel, New Stig unavailable for comment (update: BBC responds)". Engadget. March 30, 2011. Archived from the original on December 6, 2011. Retrieved November 20, 2011.
  54. ^ Wilman, Andy (April 2, 2011). "Tesla vs Top Gear: Andy Wilman on our current legal action". Top Gear. Transmission. Archived from the original on November 21, 2011. Retrieved November 20, 2011.
  55. ^ "BBC denies rigging Top Gear Tesla Roadster car race". Newsbeat. BBC. March 30, 2011. Archived from the original on December 3, 2011. Retrieved November 20, 2011.
  56. ^ Vaughan, Adam (March 30, 2011). "Tesla sues Top Gear over 'faked' electric car race". The Guardian. Environment. London. Archived from the original on January 8, 2014. Retrieved November 20, 2011.
  57. ^ celticmadliam (February 12, 2012), Old Top Gear 1992 - Porsche 968 & Jaguar XJS, archived from the original on September 11, 2019, retrieved July 28, 2019
  58. ^ "Tesla losing Top Gear court challenge". The Independent. October 21, 2011. Archived from the original on October 23, 2011. Retrieved October 21, 2011.
  59. ^ Plunkett, John (February 23, 2012). "Top Gear libel case over Tesla electric sports car struck out". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on April 15, 2015. Retrieved April 12, 2015.
  60. ^ Eberhard v. Musk, Case No.: CIV-484400 (Superior Court of the State of California County of San Mateo July 29, 2009) ("From defendand's filing: "During a conversation with Musk in 2003, JB Straubel ("Straubel"), who later became Tesla's Chief Technology Officer, learned of Musk's interest in the development of an all-electric automobile. Following this conversation, he introduced Musk to Tom Gage and Al Ciccone at AC Propulsion, a company that had built an all-electric concept sports car call the Tzero. Musk was enthusiastic and encouraged Gage and Ciccone to put the Tzero concept into production. Though Musk was unable to persuade AC Propulsion to mass produce the Tzero, Gage offered to give Musk's contact information to two groups who did have such an interest, one of which included Eberhard, Marc Tarpenning ("Tarpenning"), and Ian Wright ("Wright").").
  61. ^ Fehrenbacher, Katie (June 14, 2009). "Tesla Lawsuit: The Incredible Importance of Being a Founder". Earth2tech. Archived from the original on July 23, 2010. Retrieved August 1, 2009.
  62. ^ Martin Eberhard lawsuit (PDF), San Mateo County, CA[permanent dead link]
  63. ^ "Soap Opera". Tesla Motors. June 22, 2009. Archived from the original on August 22, 2016. Retrieved August 1, 2009. "Tesla Motors, Inc." consisted of Eberhard, Tarpenning and Wright, plus an unfunded business plan, and they were looking for an initial round of funding to create a more advanced prototype than the AC Propulsion Tzero. While there was a basic corporation in place, Tesla hadn't even registered or obtained the trademark to its name and had no formal offices or assets. To save legal fees, we just copied the SpaceX articles of incorporation and bylaws for Tesla and I invested $6.35M (98%) of the initial closing of $6.5M in Series A funding. Eberhard invested $75k (approximately 1%).
  64. ^ "Superior Court of California". County of San Mateo. July 17, 2009. Archived from the original on August 4, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009.
  65. ^ "Judge Strikes Claim on Who Can Be Declared a Founder of Tesla Motors [press release]". Business Wire. Archived from the original on June 6, 2011. Retrieved August 1, 2009.
  66. ^ Squatriglia, Chuck (August 19, 2009). "Eberhard Says 'Uncle' in Tesla Lawsuit". Wired. Autopia. Archived from the original on September 25, 2009. Retrieved September 14, 2009.
  67. ^ "Tesla Motors founders: Now there are five". CNET. September 21, 2009. Archived from the original on July 11, 2012. Retrieved September 21, 2009.
  68. ^ Rufford, Nick (March 18, 2015). "Dale Vince v Elon Musk: Electric car tsars at war over motorway charging stations". The Sunday Times. UK. Archived from the original on June 19, 2018. Retrieved June 19, 2018.
  69. ^ Vaughan, Adam (May 23, 2014). "Tesla Motors accused of bullying to grab key car charging sites in the UK". The Guardian. UK. Archived from the original on June 4, 2014. Retrieved June 14, 2014.
  70. ^ Green, Chris (June 12, 2014). "Misdirected email sparks electric car war between Tesla and Ecotricity". The Independent. UK. Archived from the original on June 13, 2014. Retrieved June 14, 2014.
  71. ^ Bennett, Peter (June 17, 2015). "Tesla and Ecotricity reach out of court settlement over Electric Highways dispute". Next Energy News. Archived from the original on June 18, 2015. Retrieved June 18, 2015.
  72. ^ McCoy, Kevin. "Lawsuit: SolarCity employees created fake sales records that boosted the company's value". USA TODAY. Archived from the original on October 13, 2018. Retrieved February 7, 2021.
  73. ^ "Accessing Court Records for the San Diego Superior Court". Archived from the original on June 14, 2021. Retrieved April 16, 2021. Civil case 37-2018-00037100-CU-WT-CTL (case 37100 in the year 2018): On 6/5/2020: Complaint dismissed with prejudice as to White, Anqunetta; Complaint dismissed with prejudice as to Ray, Robert; Complaint dismissed with prejudice as to Staples, Andrew; Complaint dismissed with prejudice as to Tesla Inc.; Complaint dismissed with prejudice as to Solarcity Corporation.
  74. ^ Hansen, Louis (September 18, 2017). "Suit: Tesla, other automakers used illegal foreign workers to build plants". The Mercury News. Archived from the original on September 25, 2017. Retrieved September 25, 2017.
  75. ^ LESNIK v. EISENMANN SE, 374 F. Supp. 3d 923 (U.S. Dist. (N.D. Cal.) 2019).
  76. ^ "PLAINTIFFS' CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NO. 5:16-cv-01120-BLF". U.S. District Court for the California Northern District - Document Filing System. May 15, 2022. Archived from the original on August 8, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2022.
  77. ^ "Be prepared for these roadblocks if you want to drive a Tesla in Singapore | Stuff". www.stuff.tv. Archived from the original on May 25, 2016. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  78. ^ "LTA on Tesla: CO2 emissions for electric cars start at power grid". Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on May 30, 2016. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  79. ^ "Gas Mileage of 2014 Tesla Model S". www.fueleconomy.gov. Archived from the original on June 16, 2016. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  80. ^ a b c "Here's how clean a Model S is in Singapore (and elsewhere)". Tesla Motors. March 10, 2016. Archived from the original on August 17, 2016. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  81. ^ hermes (March 4, 2016). "Electric car Tesla slapped with $15,000 tax surcharge". The Straits Times. Archived from the original on May 31, 2016. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  82. ^ "LTA on Tesla: CO2 emissions for electric cars start at power grid". Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on June 11, 2016. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  83. ^ "Singapore's LTA says the Tesla Model S it tested was a used car, hence its low efficiency". Tech in Asia. March 10, 2016. Archived from the original on June 25, 2016. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  84. ^ "Singapore Warms to Electric Cars Two Years After Tesla's Rebuke". Bloomberg.com. March 7, 2021. Archived from the original on March 25, 2021. Retrieved April 5, 2021.
  85. ^ "Tesla, once labelled as "lifestyle", now finally launches electric cars in S'pore". The Online Citizen Asia. February 17, 2021. Archived from the original on April 18, 2021. Retrieved April 5, 2021.
  86. ^ Lin, Chen (October 28, 2021). "Tesla EV sales boom in Singapore, pushing rivals' models off the streets". Reuters. Archived from the original on August 8, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2022.
  87. ^ "Female engineer sues Tesla, describing a culture of 'pervasive harassment'". the Guardian. February 28, 2017. Archived from the original on April 17, 2021. Retrieved April 9, 2021.
  88. ^ "Case Number: RG16831835 Title: Vandermeyden VS Tesla Motors. Request Re: Dismissal with prejudice - entire action Entered". The Superior Court Of California, County Of Alameda. January 3, 2019. Archived from the original on April 16, 2021. Retrieved April 15, 2021.
  89. ^ Lambert, Fred (October 10, 2016). "Lawsuits are piling up against Tesla (TSLA) over the SolarCity (SCTY) merger, Tesla says 'without merit'". Electrek. Archived from the original on October 11, 2016. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
  90. ^ Hals, Tom (January 18, 2022). "Tesla investors urge judge to order Musk repay $13 bln for SolarCity deal". Reuters. Archived from the original on January 18, 2022. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
  91. ^ Fiegerman, Seth (November 17, 2016). "Tesla Shareholders approve SolarCity merger". CNN Money. Archived from the original on February 1, 2017. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
  92. ^ Kolodny, Lora (October 28, 2019). "Tesla's Elon Musk knew SolarCity faced a 'liquidity crisis' at time of 2016 deal, legal documents show". CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2020. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
  93. ^ Hals, Tom; Jackson, Sierra (July 12, 2021). "Musk tells SolarCity trial that Tesla would 'die' if he wasn't CEO". Reuters. Archived from the original on December 30, 2021. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
  94. ^ Jackson, Sierra (October 27, 2021). "Judge narrows Tesla shareholders' lawsuit against Musk over SolarCity deal". Reuters. Archived from the original on December 30, 2021. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
  95. ^ Elliott, Rebecca (April 27, 2022). "Judge Rules Elon Musk Didn't Act Unlawfully in SolarCity Takeover". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on April 28, 2022. Retrieved April 28, 2022.
  96. ^ Hals, Tom (June 6, 2023). "Court upholds Musk's win in $13 bln lawsuit over Tesla-SolarCity deal". Reuters.
  97. ^ Shumsky, Tatyana (November 29, 2016). "SEC Criticizes Tesla Over 'Tailored' Accounting". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on November 29, 2016. Retrieved November 29, 2016. The SEC has judged the matter resolved without further action, according to an Oct. 12 letter the regulator sent to the company.
  98. ^ Kakuk, Michael A. (April 21, 2017). "Tesla Class Action Lawsuit Says Autopilot Feature is Dangerously Defective". Top Class Actions. Archived from the original on April 22, 2017. Retrieved April 21, 2017.
  99. ^ Calfas, Jennifer (April 20, 2017). "Tesla Owners Filed a Lawsuit Saying the New Autopilot Is 'Demonstrably Dangerous'". Fortune. Archived from the original on April 22, 2017. Retrieved April 21, 2017.
  100. ^ Muoio, Danielle (April 20, 2017). "Tesla owners have filed a class-action lawsuit alleging Autopilot 2 is 'demonstrably dangerous'". Business Insider. Australia. Archived from the original on April 21, 2017. Retrieved April 21, 2017.
  101. ^ Bellon, Tina (May 25, 2018). "Tesla agrees to settle class action over Autopilot billed as 'safer'". Reuters. Archived from the original on January 29, 2019. Retrieved January 28, 2019.
  102. ^ Cooper, Perry. "Tesla Autopilot Class Settlement Gets Final OK". Bloomberg Law. Archived from the original on March 3, 2022. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
  103. ^ Dayen, David (April 19, 2017). "Tesla Workers File Charges With National Labor Board as Battle With Elon Musk Intensifies". Capital and Main. Archived from the original on April 22, 2017. Retrieved April 22, 2017.
  104. ^ Field, Kyle (April 20, 2017). "Tesla factory workers intensify unionization efforts, file charges with National Labor Board". Teslarati.com. Archived from the original on April 22, 2017. Retrieved April 22, 2017.
  105. ^ a b O'Donovan, Caroline (April 25, 2017). "Workers involved in union activities say Tesla is illegally intimidating them". CNBC. Archived from the original on April 25, 2017. Retrieved April 26, 2017.
  106. ^ Langfitt, Frank. "The End Of The Line For GM-Toyota Joint Venture". NPR. Archived from the original on December 1, 2017. Retrieved November 20, 2017.
  107. ^ Maynard, Micheline. "Building Teslas At The GM Plant That Refused To Die". Forbes. Archived from the original on December 6, 2017. Retrieved April 7, 2018.
  108. ^ Wiessner, Daniel (May 26, 2018). "UAW accuses Musk of threatening Tesla workers over unionization". Reuters. US. Archived from the original on May 30, 2018. Retrieved June 4, 2018.
  109. ^ Eidelson, Josh (May 24, 2018). "Musk Stock-Option Tweet Violated U.S. Labor Law, UAW Alleges". Bloomberg. US. Archived from the original on May 25, 2018. Retrieved June 4, 2018.
  110. ^ Sumagaysay, Levi (June 1, 2018). "Elon Musk and unions: Congressman asks Tesla CEO to stop 'threats'". The Mercury News. US. Archived from the original on June 14, 2018. Retrieved June 4, 2018.
  111. ^ Eidelson, Josh (September 27, 2019). "Tesla Labor Practices and Musk Tweet Broke the Law, Judge Rules". Bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on February 6, 2021. Retrieved February 6, 2021.
  112. ^ Campbell, Alexia Fernández (September 30, 2019). "Elon Musk broke US labor laws on Twitter". Vox. Archived from the original on January 16, 2021. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
  113. ^ Viswanatha, Aruna; Cimilluca, Dana; Pulliam, Susan (October 26, 2018). "Tesla Faces Deepening Criminal Probe Over Whether It Misstated Production Figures". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on November 21, 2020. Retrieved February 7, 2021.
  114. ^ Kelleher, Keven (March 25, 2019). "Federal Judge Dismisses Tesla Shareholders' Lawsuit on Model 3 Production—Again". Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
  115. ^ O'Kane, Sean (February 21, 2018). "Tesla accused of knowingly selling defective vehicles in new lawsuit". The Verge. Archived from the original on September 22, 2020. Retrieved August 18, 2020.
  116. ^ Adam Williams v. Tesla, Inc. (United States District Court District of New Jersey December 11, 2021), Text.
  117. ^ "Williams v. Tesla, Inc., California Northern District Court, Case No. 4:20-cv-08208-HSG". PlainSite. June 14, 2022. Archived from the original on December 6, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2022.
  118. ^ Ruffo, Gustavo Henrique (July 21, 2020). "Lemon Laundering? Tesla Also Resells Defective Buyback Cars Abroad". InsideEVs. Archived from the original on July 23, 2020. Retrieved August 18, 2020.
  119. ^ Mangan, Dan; Kolodny, Lora (January 30, 2024). "Elon Musk's $56 billion Tesla compensation voided by judge, shares slide". CNBC. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
  120. ^ Kolodny, Arjun Kharpal,Lora (February 1, 2024). "Elon Musk says Tesla will hold a shareholder vote to incorporate in Texas after Delaware pay snub". CNBC. Retrieved February 6, 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  121. ^ Isidore, Chris (June 13, 2024). "Tesla shareholders re-approve Elon Musk's pay package worth billions that a judge struck down | CNN Business". CNN. Retrieved October 14, 2024.
  122. ^ a b Claburn, Thomas. "Tesla inches toward GPL compliance in low gear: Source code forcibly ejected into public". The Register. Archived from the original on September 19, 2018. Retrieved January 29, 2019.
  123. ^ a b Cranz, Alex (May 21, 2018). "It Only Took Six Years, But Tesla Is No Longer Screwing Up Basic Software Licenses". Archived from the original on September 23, 2018. Retrieved January 29, 2019.
  124. ^ "The Software Freedom Conservancy on Tesla's GPL compliance [LWN.net]". lwn.net. Archived from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 29, 2019.
  125. ^ Robinson, Matt; Faux, Zeke (March 13, 2019). "When Elon Musk Tried to Destroy a Tesla Whistleblower". Bloomberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on January 29, 2021. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
  126. ^ a b Alvarez, Simon (June 20, 2018). "Tesla files lawsuit against ex-employee for sabotage, misreporting to media". teslarati.com. Archived from the original on July 2, 2018. Retrieved July 1, 2018.
  127. ^ Klippenstein, Matthew (July 21, 2019). "Tesla Enters "Whistleblower Hell"". The Drive. Archived from the original on January 10, 2021. Retrieved May 11, 2020.
  128. ^ O'Kane, Sean (March 13, 2019). "Tesla allegedly hacked, spied on, and followed Gigafactory whistleblower: report". The Verge. Archived from the original on January 10, 2021. Retrieved May 11, 2020.
  129. ^ Krishna, Swapna (June 28, 2018). "Tesla wants former employee's data from Dropbox and Facebook". engadget.com. Archived from the original on June 30, 2018. Retrieved July 1, 2018.
  130. ^ Alvarez, Simon (June 29, 2018). "Ex-Tesla employee accused of sabotage is crowdfunding $500k to support legal battle". teslarati.com. Archived from the original on June 30, 2018. Retrieved July 1, 2018.
  131. ^ Szymkowski, Sean. "Tesla wins lawsuit against whistleblower accused of hacks". Roadshow. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
  132. ^ "Tesla, Inc. v. Tripp :: Nevada District Court :: Federal Civil Lawsuit No. 3:18-cv-00296-MMD-CLB, Judge Miranda M. Du presiding". www.plainsite.org. Archived from the original on January 11, 2021. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
  133. ^ Evans, Will. "Tesla fired safety official for reporting unsafe conditions, lawsuit says". Reveal. Archived from the original on June 12, 2018. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  134. ^ a b Felton, Ryan (June 11, 2018). "Lawsuit: Tesla Fired Exec After He Raised Concerns About Workplace Injuries Going Unreported (Updated)". Jalopnik. Archived from the original on June 12, 2018. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  135. ^ "Ramirez v. Tesla, Inc., Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. RG18908005". PlainSite. September 9, 2021. Archived from the original on August 8, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2022.
  136. ^ "RG18908005 Ramirez VS Tesla, Inc". Superior Court of Alameda County Public Portal (requires free account). August 3, 2021. Archived from the original on March 4, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2022. Disposed: 08/03/2021 Legacy Dismissal
  137. ^ "Tesla Gigafactory Worker Allegedly Trafficking 'Significant Quantities' of Cartel Drugs, says Ex-Employee [Updated]". Jalopnik. August 16, 2018. Archived from the original on August 16, 2018. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  138. ^ a b Kolodny, Lora (August 16, 2018). "Tesla ex-security employee alleges theft, drug dealing and spying at Gigafactory". CNBC. Archived from the original on September 4, 2020. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  139. ^ "CaseNo.: 3:19-cv-00413 KARL HANSEN, Plaintiff, vs. ELON MUSK; TESLA, INC.; TESLA MOTORS, INC.; U.S. SECURITY ASSOCIATES; DOES 1 THROUGH 50". PlainSite. July 19, 2019. Archived from the original on March 4, 2023. Retrieved August 7, 2022.
  140. ^ "Case 3:19-cv-00413-LRH-WGC Document 55". PlainSite. July 15, 2020. Archived from the original on August 7, 2022. Retrieved August 7, 2022.
  141. ^ Hoffman, Bill (June 17, 2022). "JAMS ARBITRATION CASE REFERENCE NO. 1260005897". PlainSite. Archived from the original on August 7, 2022. Retrieved August 7, 2022. Claimant has failed to establish the claims contained in his demand for arbitration. Accordingly, his claims are denied, and he shall take nothing.
  142. ^ "Former Tesla employee claims Elon Musk wanted cover up". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on May 24, 2021. Retrieved May 24, 2021.
  143. ^ "LYNN THOMPSON, Plaintiff, vs. TESLA MOTORS, INC; ELON MUSK, ONQGLOBAL, INC., DOES 1-50, and ROE CORPORATIONS 1-50". PlainSite. October 29, 2019. Archived from the original on August 7, 2022. Retrieved August 7, 2022.
  144. ^ "Lynn Thompson v. Tesla Motors Inc et al. State Civil Lawsuit. Second Judicial District Court, Case No. CV19-02115". PlainSite. June 9, 2020. Archived from the original on August 7, 2022. Retrieved August 7, 2022.
  145. ^ "Thompson v. Tesla Motors Inc et al". PacerMonitor. February 9, 2024.
  146. ^ Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (August 7, 2018). "Am considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  147. ^ Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (August 7, 2018). "Shareholders could either to sell at 420 or hold shares & go private" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  148. ^ O'Kane, Sean (August 7, 2019). "The lesson from Elon Musk's 'funding secured' mess is to never tweet". The Verge. Archived from the original on May 2, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
  149. ^ Logan, Bryan. "Elon Musk announces Tesla will remain a public company". Business Insider. Archived from the original on June 18, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
  150. ^ a b Harwell, Drew; Barrett, Devlin (September 18, 2018). "Tesla facing Justice Department investigation over Elon Musk tweets". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on September 24, 2018. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  151. ^ Iovino, Nicholas (March 10, 2022). "Judge probes truthfulness of Elon Musk tweets in Tesla investor suit". www.courthousenews.com. Archived from the original on February 5, 2023. Retrieved February 5, 2023.
  152. ^ "Tesla, ex-engineer settle lawsuit over Autopilot source code". Reuters. April 16, 2021. Archived from the original on April 17, 2021. Retrieved April 18, 2021.
  153. ^ Hawkins, Andrew J. (May 1, 2019). "Tesla sued by family of man killed in Autopilot-related crash". The Verge. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  154. ^ Goldman, David (April 8, 2024). "Tesla settles with Apple engineer's family who said Autopilot caused his fatal crash | CNN Business". CNN. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
  155. ^ Vigliarolo, Brandon (April 9, 2024). "Tesla settles Apple engineer Autopilot fatality case". www.theregister.com. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  156. ^ "Tesla owner lawsuit claims software update fraudulently cut battery capacity". Reuters. Retrieved March 26, 2024.
  157. ^ "Tesla agrees to pay 15 million to settle claims over temporary battery voltage reduction". Reuters. Retrieved March 26, 2024.
  158. ^ Porterfield, Carlie (May 24, 2021). "Tesla Found Guilty Of Throttling Battery Life, Charging Speed in Norway". Forbes.
  159. ^ Hawkins, Andrew J. (May 24, 2021). "Tesla faces a huge fine in Norway for throttling battery charging speeds". The Verge. Retrieved March 25, 2024.
  160. ^ a b "Case 1:19-cv-03737" (PDF). iradvocates.org.
  161. ^ Kelly, Annie (December 16, 2019). "Apple and Google Named in US Lawsuit over Congolese Child Cobalt Mining Deaths". The Guardian. Guardian News and Media. Retrieved May 11, 2020.
  162. ^ "DOE 1 et al v. APPLE INC. et al". www.law360.com. November 2, 2021. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
  163. ^ "Tesla board, CEO Elon Musk sued over 'excessive compensation' – Bloomberg". spglobal.com. June 18, 2020. Archived from the original on February 13, 2022. Retrieved February 13, 2022.
  164. ^ a b The Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. Elon Musk, et al. (Delaware Court of Chancery June 17, 2020), Text.
  165. ^ Hals, Tom (July 17, 2023). "Tesla directors pay $735 mln to settle lawsuit over excess compensation". Reuters.
  166. ^ Brooks, Khristopher J. (August 6, 2021). "Former Tesla employee who said supervisors called him the N-word awarded $1 million". www.cbsnews.com. Archived from the original on August 8, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2022.
  167. ^ Hull, Dana (August 5, 2021). "Ex-Tesla Employee Called Racial Slur Wins Rare $1 Million Award". www.bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on August 8, 2021. Retrieved August 8, 2021.
  168. ^ Matt McFarland (September 16, 2021). "Some Tesla owners are losing trust in Elon Musk's promises of 'full self-driving'". CNN. Archived from the original on September 17, 2021. Retrieved September 17, 2021.
  169. ^ "U.S. District Court, United States District Court - District of New Mexico (Albuquerque) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:21-cv-00917-JB-SCY". United States District Court - District of New Mexico - Document Filing System. July 29, 2022. Archived from the original on August 8, 2022. Retrieved August 8, 2022.
  170. ^ "Black ex-Tesla worker who claimed racial abuse awarded $137M". Associated Press. October 5, 2021. Archived from the original on October 6, 2021. Retrieved October 6, 2021.
  171. ^ "Tesla must face lawsuit claiming racism at California factory". Reuters. December 31, 2019. Archived from the original on October 6, 2021. Retrieved October 6, 2021.
  172. ^ Stempel, Jonathan; Wiessner, Daniel (April 14, 2022). "Judge finds Tesla liable to Black former worker who alleged bias, but slashes payout". Reuters. Archived from the original on April 14, 2022. Retrieved April 14, 2022.
  173. ^ Paul, Kari (April 3, 2023). "Black former worker awarded $3.2m in Tesla factory racial-harassment suit". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved April 8, 2023.
  174. ^ Kolodny, Lora (September 17, 2021). "Tesla to reverse solar price hike for some customers, legal filing says". CNBC. Retrieved July 14, 2023.
  175. ^ "Amans-v-Tesla-consolidated-class-action-complaint.pdf" (PDF). truthinadvertising.org.
  176. ^ Kolodny, Lora (July 11, 2023). "Tesla settles class-action Solar Roof lawsuit for $6 million". CNBC. Retrieved July 14, 2023.
  177. ^ "Alameda eCourt Public Portal: 22CV006357 BARKER vs TESLA, INC., et al. Civil Unlimited (Wrongful Termination)". eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov. May 16, 2022. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  178. ^ Ruffo, Gustavo Henrique (February 15, 2022). "Tesla Is Sued for Whompy Wheels in Coral Gables Fatal Crash". autoevolution. Archived from the original on August 10, 2022. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
  179. ^ "Mirta Garcia, et al v. Tesla Florida Inc., et al :: County Court in and for Broward County, Florida :: State Civil Lawsuit No. CACE22002046". www.plainsite.org. Archived from the original on July 2, 2022. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
  180. ^ "Tesla Model S and Model X Suspension Defects". McCune Wright Arevalo, LLP. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved November 18, 2020.
  181. ^ "Tesla, ordered to recall 30,000 cars in China, blames 'driver abuse'". Los Angeles Times. October 23, 2020. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved November 18, 2020.
  182. ^ "Broward County Case Number: CACE22002046; Mirta Garcia, et al Plaintiff vs. Tesla Florida Inc., et al Defendant". Broward County Clerk of Courts. March 14, 2022. Retrieved March 29, 2024.
  183. ^ "Law.com Radar". www.law.com. Archived from the original on September 10, 2022. Retrieved September 10, 2022.
  184. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (September 8, 2022). "Elon Musk $258 billion Dogecoin lawsuit expands". Reuters. Archived from the original on September 10, 2022. Retrieved September 10, 2022.
  185. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (June 1, 2023). "Elon Musk is accused of insider trading by investors in Dogecoin lawsuit". Reuters.
  186. ^ Graf, Rachel (August 30, 2024). "Musk, Tesla Beat Suit Over Promoting Dogecoin 'Pyramid Scheme'". Bloomberg News.
  187. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (August 29, 2024). "Elon Musk, Tesla win dismissal of lawsuit claiming they rigged dogecoin". Reuters.
  188. ^ Scarcella, Mike (March 15, 2023). "Tesla hit with 'right to repair' antitrust class actions". Reuters. Archived from the original on March 15, 2023. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  189. ^ Thompson, Michelle (March 17, 2023). "Tesla accused in lawsuit of monopolizing parts, repairs". Repairer Driven News. Archived from the original on March 17, 2023. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  190. ^ a b Stempel, Jonathan (June 18, 2024). "Tesla must face owners' lawsuit claiming it monopolizes vehicle repairs and parts". Reuters. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  191. ^ a b Lowery, Lurah (June 26, 2024). "Two of eight claims in Tesla anti-trust lawsuit will move forward". Repairer Driven News. Archived from the original on June 26, 2024. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  192. ^ Jin, Hyunjoo; Scarcella, Mike (April 10, 2023). "Tesla hit with class action lawsuit over alleged privacy intrusion". Reuters. Retrieved May 21, 2023.
  193. ^ Scarcella, Mike (October 13, 2023). "US judge says Tesla privacy case belongs in arbitration, not court". Reuters. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  194. ^ "PACER | PACER Case Locator. Yeh v. Tesla, Inc. Case 3:2023cv01704. Court: California Northern District Court. Case opened: 04/07/2023. Case closed: 10/13/2023". pcl.uscourts.gov. March 13, 2024. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  195. ^ "Tesla sued in federal court for allegedly misrepresenting range of its electric vehicles - CBS San Francisco". www.cbsnews.com. August 4, 2023. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
  196. ^ Brodkin, Jon (March 8, 2024). "Tesla drivers who sued over exaggerated EV range are forced into arbitration". Ars Technica. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
  197. ^ "Tesla agrees to $1.5M settlement over improper disposal of hazardous waste - CBS San Francisco". www.cbsnews.com. February 2, 2024. Retrieved March 25, 2024.
  198. ^ "Tesla, Inc. Settles Environmental Enforcement Action Brought by California District Attorneys". sjgov.org. Retrieved March 25, 2024.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_lawsuits_involving_Tesla,_Inc.&oldid=1253051139#Securities_litigation_related_to_Musk_"funding_secured"_tweet"