Stamford was a constituency in the county of Lincolnshire of the House of Commons for the Parliament of England to 1706 then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1918. It was represented by two Members of Parliament until 1868 when this was reduced to one.
Stamford | |
---|---|
Former borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
1295–1885 | |
Seats | one |
Created from | Lincolnshire |
Replaced by | Stamford |
Seats | two (until 1868), one (1868-1885) |
Stamford (or South Kesteven) division of Lincolnshire | |
---|---|
Former county constituency for the House of Commons | |
1885–1918 | |
Seats | one |
Created from | Stamford |
Replaced by | Rutland and Stamford |
Boundaries
editThe parliamentary borough was based upon the town of Stamford in the Parts of Kesteven (a traditional sub-division of the county of Lincolnshire).
When the borough constituency was abolished in 1885, the Stamford (or South Kesteven) division of Lincolnshire was created. This included the town of Stamford and surrounding territory. The county division was a considerably larger constituency than the borough one had been.
From the 1885 general election until the dissolution before the 1918 election the constituency was surrounded by to the north Sleaford; to the east Spalding; to the south east Wisbech; to the south North Northamptonshire; to the south west Rutland; to the west Melton and to the north west Newark. The constituency of Grantham was an enclave wholly surrounded by Stamford.
History
editThe Victoria County History of the County of Lincoln includes some information about the representation of Stamford in early times.
Stamford, on the other hand, which had sent Nicholas de Burton and Clement de Melton to the Parliament of 1295, only exercised what its burghers probably regarded as an onerous privilege once in the reign of Edward II when in 1322 it elected Eustace Malherbe and Hugh de Thurleby.
A further paragraph relates the position before and after the borough began to send representatives regularly in 1467.
Stamford for some 150 years after the reign of Edward II apparently forbore to exercise its onerous privilege of returning members. In the seventeenth century it was afflicted with the usual controversy prevalent in small communities as to where the right of election lay, and the Committee of Privileges reported in 1661 'That the right of election was in such freemen only as paid scot and lot'.
Sedgwick explained in The House of Commons 1715-1754 that before 1727 the Bertie and Cecil families each nominated one member. From 1727 the Cecil interest controlled both seats. An attempt was made by Savile Cust in 1734 to establish an electoral interest in the borough,[1] but when this failed the Cecils were left with a secure pocket borough.
Namier and Brooke in The House of Commons 1754-1790 confirmed that before the Reform Act 1832 the right of election was in the inhabitants of the parliamentary borough paying scot and lot, a local tax. They estimated the number of voters at about 500 (unchanged from Sedgwick's estimate for the earlier part of the century). In 1754–1790, despite the comparatively large electorate, the constituency was under the control of the Earl of Exeter (the head of the senior branch of the House of Cecil) and elections were uncontested formalities.
The Reform Act replaced the scot and lot franchise with an occupation franchise, which slightly reduced the size of the electorate. This was because the value of the property occupation of which conferred a vote, was higher than that for houses upon which scot and lot became payable.
The area was strongly Tory or Conservative in politics. From 1801 until 1918 it only twice elected an MP from other parties (a Whig in 1831 and a Liberal in 1880). Elections before the 1874 United Kingdom general election were usually uncontested.
The borough had some distinguished representatives in the 19th century. It returned two of the three members of the triumvirate which attempted to lead the protectionist Tories in the House of Commons. The Marquess of Granby had little to commend himself as a political leader, apart from the social prestige of being the heir to the Duke of Rutland. He was briefly sole leader in 1848 before the triumvirate was created in the following year and continued until his resignation in 1851. John Charles Herries had at least held senior ministerial office. Both the Stamford MPs were easily eclipsed by the rising star of their colleague Benjamin Disraeli.
A more significant historical figure was Lord Robert Cecil (Viscount Cranborne 1865–1868) who represented the borough between 1853 and 1868. As the Marquess of Salisbury he was the leading figure in the Conservative Party from the death of Disraeli in 1881 until he retired as Prime Minister in 1902.
Another leading Conservative with connections to the borough was Sir Stafford Northcote, Bt the party leader in the House of Commons 1876-1885 (from 1881 at the same time as Salisbury was leader in the House of Lords). Northcote was a Stamford MP from 1858 to 1866.
Under the Reform Act 1867 the borough electorate was expanded, but it lost one seat in Parliament from the 1868 United Kingdom general election.
The Representation of the People Act 1884 further expanded the electorate. The Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 abolished the borough constituency but created an expanded county division of the same name. These changes took effect with the 1885 United Kingdom general election.
Under the Representation of the People Act 1918 the electorate was again expanded, but the Stamford area was combined with the county of Rutland in a new Rutland and Stamford constituency.
Members of Parliament
editMPs 1295–1322
edit- 1295: Nicholas de Burton, Clement de Melton
- 1322: Eustace Malherbe, Hugh de Thurleby
- After this date no members were returned for a considerable period.
MPs 1467–1640
edit- 1543(?): William Cecil[note 1]
MPs 1640–1868
editMPs 1868–1918
editElection | Member | Party | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1868 | Sir John Dalrymple-Hay, Bt | Conservative | ||||
1880 | Marston Clarke Buszard | Liberal | ||||
1885: Borough constituency abolished. Name transferred to county division | ||||||
1885 | John Lawrance | Conservative | ||||
1890 by-election | Henry Cust | Conservative | ||||
1895 | William Younger | Conservative | ||||
1906 | Lord John Joicey-Cecil | Conservative | ||||
1910 | Claud Heathcote-Drummond-Willoughby | Conservative | ||||
1918 | constituency abolished |
Notes
- ^ Cecil's diary records that he was elected an MP in 1543, but the parliamentary records are incomplete. Neale has suggested that he was probably elected for Stamford, which was certainly his constituency from 1547
- ^ Created The Lord Carysfort (in the Peerage of Ireland, January 1752
- ^ Burghley was also elected for Rutland, which he chose to represent, and never sat for Stamford
- ^ Knighted (KB), 1774; General from 1777, Field Marshal from 1793
- ^ a b In the Peerage of Ireland
- ^ Later a General
- ^ Styled Viscount Cranborne from 1865
Election notes
editThe bloc vote electoral system was used in two seat elections and first past the post for single member by-elections. Each voter had up to as many votes as there were seats to be filled. Votes had to be cast by a spoken declaration, in public, at the hustings (until the secret ballot was introduced in 1872).
Note on percentage change calculations: Where there was only one candidate of a party in successive elections, for the same number of seats, change is calculated on the party percentage vote. Where there was more than one candidate, in one or both successive elections for the same number of seats, then change is calculated on the individual percentage vote.
Note on sources: The information for the election results given below is taken from Namier and Brooke 1754–1790, Stooks Smith 1790-1832 and Craig from the 1832 United Kingdom general election. Where Stooks Smith gives additional information or differs from the other sources this is indicated in a note after the result.
Elections before 1715
editDates of Parliaments 1660-1715
Summoned | Elected | Opened | Dismissed |
---|---|---|---|
16 March 1660 | 1660 | 25 April 1660 | 29 December 1660 |
18 February 1661 | 1661 | 8 May 1661 | 24 January 1679 |
25 January 1679 | 1679 | 6 March 1679 | 12 July 1679 |
24 July 1679 | 1679–1680 | 21 October 1680 | 18 January 1681 |
20 January 1681 | 1681 | 21 March 1681 | 28 March 1681 |
14 February 1685 | 1685 | 19 May 1685 | 2 July 1687 |
29 December 1688 | 1688–1689 | 22 January 1689 | 6 February 1690 |
6 February 1690 | 1690 | 20 March 1690 | 11 October 1695 |
12 October 1695 | 1695 | 22 November 1695 | 6 July 1698 |
13 July 1698 | 1698 | 24 August 1698 | 19 December 1700 |
26 December 1700 | 1700–1701 | 6 February 1701 | 11 November 1701 |
3 November 1701 | 1701 | 30 December 1701 | 2 July 1702 |
2 July 1702 | 1702 | 20 August 1702 | 5 April 1705 |
1705 | 7 May-6 June 1705 | 14 June 1705 | see Note |
1707 | see Note | 23 October 1707 | 3 April 1708 |
1708 | 30 April-7 July 1708 | 8 July 1708 | 21 September 1710 |
1710 | 2 October-16 November 1710 | 25 November 1710 | 8 August 1713 |
1713 | 22 August-12 November 1713 | 12 November 1713 | 15 January 1715 |
Note:-
- The MPs of the Parliament of England (elected 1705) and 45 members co-opted from the former Parliament of Scotland, became the House of Commons of the 1st Parliament of Great Britain in 1707.
Election results 1715-1800
edit
1710s – 1720s – 1730s – 1740s – 1750s – 1760s – 1770s – 1780s – 1790s |
Elections in the 1710s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Charles Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Charles Bertie | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1720s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Brownlow Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Charles Bertie | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Succession of Cecil as 8th Earl of Exeter
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | William Noel | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | William Noel | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Robert Shirley | Elected | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Charles Bertie | Defeated | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1730s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | William Noel | 339 | 32.60 | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | John Proby | 316 | 30.38 | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Savile Cust | 205 | 19.71 | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Thomas Fonnereau | 180 | 17.31 | N/A | |
Turnout | 1,040 | N/A | N/A |
- Seat vacated when Noel was appointed to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | William Noel | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1740s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | William Noel | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | John Proby | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Brownlow Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | John Proby | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Seat vacated when Burghley chose to sit for Rutland
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Robert Barbor | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1750s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | John Harvey-Thursby | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Robert Barbor | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1760s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | John Chaplin | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | George Bridges Brudenell | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Death of Chaplin
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George René Aufrère | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Brudenell to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George Bridges Brudenell | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George Howard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | George René Aufrère | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1770s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George Howard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Henry Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1780s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George Howard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Henry Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George Howard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Henry Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1790s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George Howard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | John Proby | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George Howard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | John Proby | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Death of Howard
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | John Leland | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
Election Results 1801-1918
edit1800s – 1810s – 1820s – 1830s – 1840s – 1850s – 1860s – 1870s – 1880s – 1890s – 1900s – 1910s |
Elections in the 1800s
edit- Proby was raised to the peerage as Earl of Carysfort
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Albemarle Bertie | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory gain from Whig |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | John Leland | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Albemarle Bertie | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | John Leland | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Albemarle Bertie | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | John Leland | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Albemarle Bertie | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Death of Leland
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Evan Foulkes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold |
- Succession of Bertie as the 9th Earl of Lindsey
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Charles Chaplin | 306 | 68.3 | N/A | |
Whig | Jephson Oddy | 142 | 31.7 | New | |
Majority | 154 | 36.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 448 | N/A | |||
Tory hold |
- Note (1809): Stooks Smith records that the polls were open for two days
Elections in the 1810s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Evan Foulkes | 360 | 36.5 | N/A | |
Tory | John Henniker-Major | 354 | 35.9 | N/A | |
Whig | Gerard Noel | 272 | 27.6 | N/A | |
Majority | 82 | 8.3 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 986 (626 voted) | N/A | |||
Tory hold | |||||
Tory hold |
Note (1812): Stooks Smith records that the polls were open for two days
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Lord Thomas Cecil | 328 | 49.1 | ||
Tory | William Henry Percy | 324 | 48.5 | ||
Whig | Joseph Clayton Jennyns | 12 | 1.8 | ||
Whig | Thomas Best | 4 | 0.6 | ||
Majority | 312 | 46.7 | |||
Turnout | 668 (336 voted) | ||||
Tory hold | Swing | ||||
Tory hold | Swing |
Note (1818): Stooks Smith records that the polls were open for one day
Elections in the 1820s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Lord Thomas Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | William Henry Percy | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Lord Thomas Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Thomas Chaplin | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1830s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Thomas Cecil | 467 | 41.8 | ||
Tory | Thomas Chaplin | 335 | 30.0 | ||
Whig | Charles Tennyson | 314 | 28.1 | ||
Majority | 21 | 1.9 | |||
Turnout | 667 | c. 86.6 | |||
Registered electors | c. 770 | ||||
Tory hold | |||||
Tory hold |
Note (1830): Stooks Smith records that the polls were open for four days
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Thomas Cecil | 390 | 37.2 | −4.6 | |
Whig | Charles Tennyson | 356 | 34.0 | +5.9 | |
Tory | Thomas Chaplin | 302 | 28.8 | −1.2 | |
Turnout | 666 | c. 86.5 | c. −0.1 | ||
Registered electors | c. 770 | ||||
Majority | 34 | 3.2 | +1.3 | ||
Tory hold | Swing | −3.8 | |||
Majority | 54 | 5.2 | N/A | ||
Whig gain from Tory |
Note (1831): Stooks Smith records that the polls were open for three days
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Thomas Chaplin | 526 | 40.9 | +12.1 | |
Tory | George Finch | 463 | 36.0 | −1.2 | |
Whig | Arthur Francis Gregory[11] | 296 | 23.0 | −11.0 | |
Majority | 167 | 13.0 | +9.8 | ||
Turnout | 766 | 90.0 | c. +3.5 | ||
Registered electors | 851 | ||||
Tory hold | Swing | +7.5 | |||
Tory gain from Whig |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Chaplin | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | George Finch | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 755 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Chaplin | 201 | 50.0 | ||
Conservative | Charles Manners | 200 | 49.8 | ||
Whig | Hercules Langford Rowley | 1 | 0.2 | ||
Majority | 200 | 49.6 | |||
Turnout | 201 | 29.4 | |||
Registered electors | 684 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Note (1837): Rowley retired before the poll.
- Resignation of Chaplin
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | George Clerk | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1840s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | George Clerk | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Charles Manners | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 661 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Clerk as Master of the Mint
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | George Clerk | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Manners | 349 | 40.0 | N/A | |
Conservative | John Charles Herries | 288 | 33.0 | N/A | |
Conservative | John Rolt | 236 | 27.0 | N/A | |
Majority | 52 | 6.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 524 | 85.1 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 616 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Note (1847): Stooks Smith has a registered electorate figure of 613, but Craig's figure of 616 is used to calculate turnout.
Elections in the 1850s
edit- Seat vacated on the appointment of Herries as President of the Board of Control for India
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Charles Herries | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Charles Herries | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Frederic Thesiger | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 566 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Resignation of Herries due to ill health[12]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Gascoyne-Cecil | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Gascoyne-Cecil | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Frederic Thesiger | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 529 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Thesiger as Lord Chancellor and his elevation to the peerage as the 1st Baron Chelmsford
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Inglis | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Inglis as Lord Justice Clerk with the Scottish judicial title of Lord Glencorse
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Stafford Northcote | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Gascoyne-Cecil | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Stafford Northcote | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 539 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1860s
edit- Lord Robert Cecil became known by the courtesy title of Viscount Cranborne, following the death of his brother in 1865.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Gascoyne-Cecil | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Stafford Northcote | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 512 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Resignation of Northcote to contest by-election in North Devon
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Dalrymple-Hay | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Seats vacated on the appointment of Cranborne as Secretary of State for India and Hay as a Lord Commissioner of the Admiralty.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Gascoyne-Cecil | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Dalrymple-Hay | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Succession of Cranborne as the 3rd Marquess of Salisbury
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Chetwynd-Talbot | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Succession of Ingestre as the 19th Earl of Shrewsbury
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Unwin Heygate | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Constituency electorate expanded and representation reduced to one seat, by the Reform Act 1867 with effect from the 1868 United Kingdom general election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Dalrymple-Hay | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,094 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1870s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Dalrymple-Hay | 557 | 57.7 | N/A | |
Liberal | Marston Clarke Buszard | 411 | 42.3 | New | |
Majority | 146 | 15.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 968 | 81.8 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 1,183 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1880s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Marston Clarke Buszard | 601 | 52.2 | +9.9 | |
Conservative | John Dalrymple-Hay | 551 | 47.8 | −9.9 | |
Majority | 50 | 4.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,152 | 91.8 | +10.0 | ||
Registered electors | 1,255 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +9.7 |
- Electorate expanded by the Representation of the People Act 1884 and parliamentary borough abolished and replaced by a county division (under the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885) with substantial boundary changes; with effect from the 1885 United Kingdom general election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Lawrance | 4,647 | 56.9 | +9.1 | |
Liberal | Joseph Stevens Cudlip | 3,514 | 43.1 | −9.1 | |
Majority | 1,133 | 13.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,161 | 83.8 | −8.0 | ||
Registered electors | 9,741 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +9.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Lawrance | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1890s
editLawrance resigned after being appointed a Judge of the Queen's Bench division of the High Court of Justice, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Cust | 4,236 | 51.7 | N/A | |
Liberal | Arthur Priestley | 3,954 | 48.3 | New | |
Majority | 282 | 3.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,190 | 77.8 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 10,526 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Cust | 4,150 | 50.8 | N/A | |
Liberal | Arthur Priestley | 4,026 | 49.2 | N/A | |
Majority | 124 | 1.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,176 | 84.0 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 9,733 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Younger | 4,203 | 52.4 | +1.6 | |
Liberal | Arthur Priestley | 3,814 | 47.6 | −1.6 | |
Majority | 389 | 4.8 | +3.2 | ||
Turnout | 8,017 | 83.0 | −1.0 | ||
Registered electors | 9,657 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +1.7 |
Elections in the 1900s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Younger | 4,292 | 55.8 | +3.4 | |
Liberal | Lewis Haslam | 3,395 | 44.2 | −3.4 | |
Majority | 897 | 11.6 | +6.8 | ||
Turnout | 7,687 | 80.6 | −1.4 | ||
Registered electors | 9,534 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +3.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Joicey-Cecil | 4,559 | 53.2 | −2.6 | |
Liberal | F. Percy Rawson | 4,018 | 46.9 | +2.7 | |
Majority | 541 | 6.3 | −5.3 | ||
Turnout | 8,577 | 87.7 | +7.1 | ||
Registered electors | 9,782 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −2.7 |
Elections in the 1910s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Claud Heathcote-Drummond-Willoughby | 4,666 | 52.0 | −1.2 | |
Liberal | George Henry Parkin | 4,310 | 48.0 | +1.1 | |
Majority | 356 | 4.0 | −2.3 | ||
Turnout | 8,976 | 89.3 | +1.6 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | −1.2 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Claud Heathcote-Drummond-Willoughby | 4,545 | 51.9 | −0.1 | |
Liberal | George Henry Parkin | 4,206 | 48.1 | +0.1 | |
Majority | 339 | 3.8 | −0.2 | ||
Turnout | 8,751 | 87.0 | −2.3 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | −0.1 |
General Election 1914–15:
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1915. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by July 1914, the following candidates had been selected;
- Unionist: Claud Heathcote-Drummond-Willoughby
- Liberal: Frank Raffety[14]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ History of Parliament online
- ^ a b c Cavill, P. R. (13 August 2009). The English Parliaments of Henry VII. ISBN 9780191610264. Retrieved 17 March 2012.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p "History of Parliament". Retrieved 27 September 2011.
- ^ "LEE, Henry (by 1514-58 or later), of Stamford, Lincs". Retrieved 22 April 2015.
- ^ Dictionary of National Biography. London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900. .
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "History of Parliament". Retrieved 27 September 2011.
- ^ Alumni Cantabrigienses
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v Stooks Smith, Henry. (1973) [1844-1850]. Craig, F. W. S. (ed.). The Parliaments of England (2nd ed.). Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. pp. 204–206. ISBN 0-900178-13-2.
- ^ a b Casey, Martin; Salmon, Philip. "Stamford". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (e-book) (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 978-1-349-02349-3.
- ^ "Stamford Election". Stamford Mercury. 14 December 1832. p. 4. Retrieved 26 April 2020 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ Urban, Sylvanus (June 1855). "Obituary: Rt. Hon. John Charles Herries". The Gentleman's Magazine. XLIII. F. Jefferies: 641. Retrieved 14 July 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f g Craig, FWS, ed. (1974). British Parliamentary Election Results: 1885-1918. London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 9781349022984.
- ^ Grantham Journal, Lincolnshire Mar 1914
Sources
edit- Boundaries of Parliamentary Constituencies 1885-1972, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Parliamentary Reference Publications 1972)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1977)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1885-1918, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1974)
- The House of Commons 1715-1754, by Romney Sedgwick (HMSO 1970)
- The House of Commons 1754-1790, by Sir Lewis Namier and John Brooke (HMSO 1964)
- The Parliaments of England by Henry Stooks Smith (1st edition published in three volumes 1844–50), second edition edited (in one volume) by F.W.S. Craig (Political Reference Publications 1973)) out of copyright
- Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "S" (part 4)
- The Victoria County History of the County of Lincoln: Volume 2, edited by William Page (First published in 1906; reprinted 1988 by Dawsons for the University of London Institute of Historical Research) out of copyright
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament: Volume I 1832-1885, edited by M. Stenton (The Harvester Press 1976)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume II 1886-1918, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1978)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume III 1919-1945, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1979)
- Robert Beatson, A Chronological Register of Both Houses of Parliament (London: Longman, Hurst, Res & Orme, 1807) [1]
- D Brunton & D H Pennington, Members of the Long Parliament (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954)
- Cobbett's Parliamentary history of England, from the Norman Conquest in 1066 to the year 1803 (London: Thomas Hansard, 1808) [2]
- J E Neale, The Elizabethan House of Commons (London: Jonathan Cape, 1949)