Proexochokefalos (meaning "big head with big tuberosities") is an extinct genus of machimosaurid teleosauroid from the Jurassic of France[1]
Proexochokefalos | |
---|---|
Skull of P. heberti | |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Reptilia |
Clade: | Archosauria |
Clade: | Pseudosuchia |
Clade: | Crocodylomorpha |
Clade: | Crocodyliformes |
Suborder: | †Thalattosuchia |
Family: | †Machimosauridae |
Subfamily: | †Machimosaurinae |
Genus: | †Proexochokefalos Johnson et al., 2020 |
Type species | |
†Proexochokefalos heberti (Morel de Glasville, 1876)
| |
Other species | |
| |
Synonyms | |
|
Classification
editThe type species, S. heberti, was originally named "Steneosaurus" heberti by Morel de Glasville in 1876 from a complete skull and mandible (MNHN.F 1890-13) found in the Callovian aged Marnes de Dives near Villers-sur-mer in the Calvados department of Normandy, France.[2] [3] [4] Steneosaurus depressus is a junior synonym. Another species referred to the genus, Proexochokefalos cf. bouchardi is known from remains from the Calcaire de Caen, France, and Reuchenette Formation, Switzerland.[1]
References
edit- ^ a b Johnson, Michela M.; Young, Mark T.; Brusatte, Stephen L. (2020). "The phylogenetics of Teleosauroidea (Crocodylomorpha, Thalattosuchia) and implications for their ecology and evolution". PeerJ. 8: e9808. doi:10.7717/peerj.9808. PMC 7548081. PMID 33083104.
- ^ Morel de Glasville M. 1876. Sur la cavité crânienne et la position du trou optique dans le Steneosaurus heberti. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 3(4):342-348
- ^ Brignon A. 2018. L’holotype de Steneosaurus heberti Morel de Glasville, 1876 : quelques précisions historiques sur une des plus remarquables découvertes paléontologiques faites aux Vaches Noires. L'Echo des Falaises, revue de l'Association paléontologique de Villers-sur-Mer, 22:7-22
- ^ Brignon A. 2018. La découverte du Steneosaurus heberti Morel de Glasville 1876 dans le Jurassique des Vaches Noires. Fossiles, revue française de Paléontologie, 36:40-46