Talk:...Saturday Night, 'Round Ten

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:...Saturday Night, 'Round Ten/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Start class: Y A reasonably complete infobox Y A lead section giving an overview of the album Y A track listing N Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient) Y Categorisation at least by artist and year C-class: N All the start class criteria Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section) N A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs N A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians N Reliable independent in-line references supporting claims – General references supplied but can't tell which claims are supported Y A casual reader should learn something about the album B-class: N All the C-class criteria N A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources – Lead section needs additional in-line references, all sources need to be reliable N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS – Lead should summarise the entire article - Basic WP:MUSTARD formatting needed, e.g. "Songs", "tracks" or "singles" have talking marks; Albums or EPs are italicised; infobox: article text claims it is a live album, infobox says its a studio album - Some copyediting needed, e.g. The performances are reculled from three sets > The performances are culled from three sets N No obvious omissions, but also no obvious extraneous information – such as "trivia" – No information outside lead section on background, writing, marketing or release Evaluation based on WikiProject Albums assessment scale. Please update this list when the article meets (or fails to meet) any of the above criteria, changing the article's class assessment as appropriate. Last reviewed by –  Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 10:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Substituted at 21:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)