Talk:104th Regiment Royal Artillery

(Redirected from Talk:104th Regiment Royal Artillery (Volunteers))
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Current Strength

edit

I was in 214 battery a few years ago and they were at less than half paper strength due to equipment and recruiting shortages. Would including this information be constructive?

Another article

edit

that is not updated. Typhoon2885 (talk) 09:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have changed the tense in one place. I am not sure in what other respect it is out of date. Dormskirk (talk) 10:20, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

update

edit

https://twitter.com/XIX_CO/status/809519600538972160

to a light gun battery.

ACSilver (talk) 08:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 104th Regiment Royal Artillery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply