Talk:1945–1960 in Western fashion
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Dead Link
editreference #37 is now a dead link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:8EC0:4D00:4442:6DC3:EFC0:7410 (talk) 19:41, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:MichelineBernardini.jpg
editThe image Image:MichelineBernardini.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Educational assignment
editAs a heads up to other editors, it appears that a school class somewhere has been set the task of editing Wikipedia to write about 1950s fashion - we've had a couple of edits to the Fashion article as well. --McGeddon (talk) 10:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've no idea how this assignment has been presented, but a lot of the students seem to just be adding their own single, self-contained paragraph summarising the whole of 1950s fashion, rather than editing and improving each other's work, or working on any of the previously existing text.
- If the class's teacher is reading this, they may like to read the considerations and suggestions for using Wikipedia as the medium for a school project. --McGeddon (talk) 13:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- The quality of this article is really very poor - there are barely any references and most of it is unverified claims and original research. It's not what Wikipedia is about. Thespeakingcat (talk) 12:32, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Before the class teacher gave the assignment to her students to edit this article, she should have made them read Wikipedia's Manual of Style first. I don't mean to sound harsh but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a playground, and I think all the edits made after 1 July 2009 should be undone. The article as it now stands is a complete mess.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- The quality of this article is really very poor - there are barely any references and most of it is unverified claims and original research. It's not what Wikipedia is about. Thespeakingcat (talk) 12:32, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Men's fashion
editThere's no information on men's fashion here... I don't have any to provide, myself, but it would be a great addition! brain (talk) 15:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, well the article needs a lot of major work on it. A chunk of text was removed a while back, and it's very untidy as it now stands. I believe a bunch of kids edited it as part of a school assignment.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Cleanup and images needed
editI am going to see if I can clean up this article - I have the references now - but we desperately need PD images that I can't locate. Any help would be appreciated:
- A typical Dior New Look suit, or retail knock-off of one.
- Teddy boys, England, pre-1960.
- Teenage girl in ponytails, pedal pushers, rolled-up jeans with men's white dress shirts,
saddle shoes and bobby socks, any combination of those things. Teenage girl in a sweater and pencil skirt.- Teenage boy in tee shirt and leather jacket.
- Commons has some Dior gowns but there are no dates on them -
if anyone can track the dates for those down, that would be great.Got 'em. - A Balenciaga suit with an unfitted (A-line) back.
Thanks, all! - PKM (talk) 01:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- BTW, for historical reference, the "chunk of text" that was removed was merged from 1950s and turns out to have been serious copyvio from this source; I am not sure when it was removed. But, we begin again. - PKM (talk) 02:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, here's a complete restructure. It still needs a
women's sportswear section, more on underwear (petticoats!), formal wear and outerwear. - PKM (talk) 03:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)- Added Sportswear and more pictures. - PKM (talk) 20:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- A 1950s image of Elvis needs to be in the article.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:22, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- The only one we've got is in costume from Jailhouse Rock, but I suppose it's better than nothing. - PKM (talk) 23:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- And BTW that copyvio comment may be an error This book was published after the Wikipedia article on the History of fashion design. - PKM (talk) 23:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- Added image of Elvis. - PKM (talk) 23:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- It looks great and adds a lot to the article as he was a 50s icon.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Added image of Elvis. - PKM (talk) 23:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- A 1950s image of Elvis needs to be in the article.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:22, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- Added Sportswear and more pictures. - PKM (talk) 20:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, here's a complete restructure. It still needs a
Decline of hats
editThere needs to be some serious information added about the decline of hats! I added a section on it but am having trouble finding info on the reasons why. --Turn685 (talk) 05:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
File:JoanCrawfordByYousufKarsh.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:JoanCrawfordByYousufKarsh.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC) |
Western world
editThis article only mentions western/european/usa-ian/whatever clothing. There's NO mention of other countries about this. It's a catastrophe really, how can wikipedia take pride in being objective and checking sources if they forgot the majority of the world? --83.250.240.27 (talk) 21:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Article has since been moved to "1945–60 in Western fashion" from Talk:1945–60 in fashion, though we still have section links to 1945–60 in Western fashion#The beginnings of Eastern fashion Banak (talk) 10:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:10, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Room for improvement
editWhen someone has a moment, I believe it would be worth researching and adding in information about african-american fashion within 1945-1960. At the moment the only mention of such is as follows
"During and after the war, oversized zoot suits were worn by rebellious teenagers, hep cats, and gang members, especially African-Americans, Italian-Americans, Cholos a.k.a. pachucos, and Chicanos"
There is a whole culture here worth expanding on for western fashion in this time period, and it would be a loss to only include a mention of such next to gang members and rebellious teenagers. This is something I'll also work on finding more information on when I have time, but if there is someone with more time or knowhow on this subject, this is some room for improvement. Mk170101 (talk) 11:51, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Writing 101-The Archive
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 January 2023 and 26 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zeedydydy (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Zeedydydy (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)