Talk:1985 Wales v Scotland football match/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 17:41, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

This is my first GA review so it might not be the best but from what I read It is overall good, however there are some issues I think need to be addressed.

  • What makes "11vs11.com" a reliable source?
  • What makes Source 2 reliable?
  • The mention that the England-Scotland games would continue needs a source
  • The last paragraph of the Home Internationals section should be reworded as it looks like an opinion
  • In the next section, the part where it says the Spain-Iceland match was later needs a source
  • No need to link FAW when you've already linked Football Association of Wales earlier
  • Stadia should be changed to stadiums.
  • Sources 7 and 8 fall foul of WP:WINARS and should be changed.
  • SFA should not be an anacronym for the first reference to it
  • The referee section should be rewritten as calling the ref "overtly strict" is not neutral
  • Source 22 is not reliable as it is made of user generated content (and calling the person they are writing about as "arrogant" on the first word is definatly not a neutral observation.)
  • Is having a picture of myopia really nessecary? It doesn't seem to add that much.
  • Alex Ferguson should be linked when he is first mentioned
  • The part in the second half section about Davie Cooper should be rewritten as it violated WP:PEA
  • The paragraph where Stein collapses and is taken to the medical room should be sourced
  • The last paragraph of the aftermath should be changed to something along the lines of "Because Stein had stopped taking......"
  • the multiple linked Alex Fergusons should be delinked after the first link mention
  • The second to last sentence in the first paragraph on the Wales section is non-neutral and should be rewritten.
  • What make sources 34 and 35 reliable?
  • Source 37 should say SFA

Other than those, it fulfills the critera and I'll happily take another look when the above are rectified. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 17:41, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Amendments

edit
  • 11vs11.com is the website of The Association of Football Statisticians and provides statistical information for various organisations including The FA, Premier League, Football League, football clubs, as well as other organisations in need of football statistics Commercial Services
  • Source 2 changed to newspaper story
  • Added source for continuation of England v Scotland games after end of British Home Championship
  • Reworded paragraph to remove appearance of opinion
  • Added source for date of Spain v Iceland
  • Removed additional links to FAW
  • Unchanged - stadia is a legitimate plural of stadium. If people don't like it then they can change it
  • Removed Wikipedia pages as sources and replaced with pages from 11vs11.com
  • Added Scottish Football Association
  • Reworded paragraph to remove appearance of opinion
  • Added new link that includes quote by referee from Dutch newspaper
  • Unchanged - image of myopia emphasises the condition and the difficulty Jim Leighton had IMO
  • Removed additional links to Alex Ferguson
  • Reworded section about Davie Cooper
  • Added source for Stein being removed to treatment room
  • Reworded paragraph about Stein not taking medication
  • Reworded paragraph about penalties
  • Source 34 is a newspaper article; Source 35 is a message board containing personal recollections from Scotland fans
  • Altered Source 35 to say SFA

Hammersfan (talk) 12:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply