Talk:1991 Croatian independence referendum

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Croatian independence referendum, 1991/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 20:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):
   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):
   b (citations to reliable sources):
   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):
   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Lead

• In the first sentence, "... the rise of ethnic tensions that led to the breakup of Yugoslavia" implied that the rise of ethnic tensions was the, or at least one of the main causes for the breakup of Yugoslavia. This is (far too) oversimplifying, it is not correct and it is misleading. I've changed it to "the development that led to ..." - the details can be found under Breakup of Yugoslavia.

BTW, the breakup of Yugoslavia was consequence of the decades of failures of the Communist regime on a broad front of issues and eventually breakup of the Communist League itself, but mainly by grave failure of Yugoslavian national economy which was accelerated by the fall of the Soviet union and other eastern block economies and consequently loss of a large market. The disaster was a consequence of several decades of errors and failures and was, at that point in time, inevitable. Multiple ethnic tensions were there for a long time, but their inflammation was far more a tool and a consequence than a cause. --Zzzrin (talk) 09:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Background

• No issues

Referendum and declaration of independence

• No issues

Recognition

• No issues

Aftermath

• No issues

References

• No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have concluded that this article meets the good article criteria. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 21:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Independence of Croatia

There's now a separate article about the entire, more general process, and only the referendum and a reduced background+aftermath is left here. Perhaps a different merge or rename is in order, I'm not hell-bent on this, it's just a way to resolve the hole in properly named history articles between SR Croatia and Croatian War of Independence... --Joy [shallot] (talk) 13:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Great job!--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Would you consider submitting it to WP:GAN?--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

I think it would be fair to delist this one before doing that, because it's now more accurate to say that the current state of that article went through GAN, rather than the current state of this article. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:58, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

I think there's no need to delist as long as it conforms to GA criteria pertaining to the referendum itself. If new material and/or references are needed they can be added. Let's take it this way: when the new article is ready for GAN, I can take another look at this one, add what's necessary and if that proves to be a substantial chunk of material, a reassessment can be requested. In terms of GA criteria, size or scope does not matter as long as the article topic is comprehensively covered. How about that?--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:34, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

In fact do you mind if I revert your last edit and conjure up a different summary of the material to maintain GA?--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Croatian independence referendum, 1991. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.jutarnji.hr/heroina-hrvatskog-proljeca/305499/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nytimes.com/1989/01/12/world/leaders-of-a-republic-in-yugoslavia-resign.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/obituary-franjo-tudjman-1132142.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/02/world/croatia-s-serbs-declare-their-autonomy.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nytimes.com/1991/06/26/world/2-yugoslav-states-vote-independence-to-press-demands.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110529223410/http://207.57.19.226/journal/Vol3/No1/art12-13.pdf to http://207.57.19.226/journal/Vol3/No1/art12-13.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120421143955/http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/4/1/1207.pdf to http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/4/1/1207.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150519235642/http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N95/766/51/PDF/N9576651.pdf?OpenElement to http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N95/766/51/PDF/N9576651.pdf?OpenElement
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nytimes.com/1991/12/24/world/slovenia-and-croatia-get-bonn-s-nod.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nytimes.com/1992/05/23/world/3-ex-yugoslav-republics-are-accepted-into-un.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111216132034/http://www.hnb.hr:80/novcan/kovanice/e25kuna.htm to http://www.hnb.hr/novcan/kovanice/e25kuna.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://articles.latimes.com/1995-08-08/news/mn-32662_1_serb-refugees
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nytimes.com/1998/01/16/world/an-ethnic-morass-is-returned-to-croatia.html?ref=croatia

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that the people aren't celebrating Independence day, but they are simply watching the game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.252.197.45 (talk) 09:46, 10 July 2020 (UTC)