Talk:1st Battalion, 9th Marines

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.iimefpublic.usmc.mil/1bn9mar
  • In 1st Battalion 9th Marines on 2011-05-25 06:51:41, HTTP Error: BadStatusLine
  • In 1st Battalion 9th Marines on 2011-06-10 03:24:10, HTTP Error: BadStatusLine

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2002/julqtr/32cfr578.4.htm
  • In 1st Battalion 9th Marines on 2011-05-25 06:51:41, 403 Forbidden
  • In 1st Battalion 9th Marines on 2011-06-10 03:27:17, 403 Forbidden

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Casualty rate

The article states that "based on a typical battalion strength of 800 Marines and Navy hospital corpsmen, 93.63% (747) were Killed In Action (KIA) and 0.25% (2) were Missing In Action (MIA)." This statistic has no source provided, and is obviously bad math. 1st Battalion 9th Marines suffered 747 KIA throughout the ENTIRE war. That figure simply takes 747 and divides by 800 to get 93% KIA. The same 800 Marines would not have served in the same battalion for the entire war! The actual Marines in 1/9 would number in the thousands. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.162.33 (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)