Talk:2000–2006 Shebaa Farms conflict
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2000–2006 Shebaa Farms conflict article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis page seems a little one-sided. Did the IDF ever react to these attacks? Not that I know much about the area, but it seems unlikely that any military would not react to kidnappings and deaths. -Edgesmash 15:29, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Dead link
editDuring several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/59c118f065c4465b852572a500625fea/5c13c973ba58deb185256f8f006f420e!OpenDocument
- In 2000–2006 Shebaa Farms conflict on 2011-05-25 07:06:38, 404 Not Found
- In 2000–2006 Shebaa Farms conflict on 2011-06-10 06:48:45, 404 Not Found
Dead link 2
editDuring several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/ny-woleba224523762nov22,0,2969932.story?coll=ny-worldnews-headlines
- In 2000–2006 Shebaa Farms conflict on 2011-05-25 07:06:38, 404 Not Found
- In 2006 Hezbollah cross-border raid on 2011-05-26 02:04:31, 404 Not Found
- In 2000–2006 Shebaa Farms conflict on 2011-06-10 06:48:54, 404 Not Found
File:Hezbollah flag.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Hezbollah flag.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:22, 27 November 2011 (UTC) |
Non neutral change
editSheilub, Israels annexation and application of civilian laws to the Golan heights has not been recognized by the international community, therefor the occupied land is not in any way "Israel". --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 13:33, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Archived (?) link
editThe original link to the Gazette article which I removed is not showing up for me in the Wayback machine archive - what comes up is a blank page, which is why I removed it. If Someone can post a better link, or perhaps a screenshot of what it looks like when archived, it would be helpful.Here come the Suns (talk) 14:25, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Update - seems to be working fine now. Here come the Suns (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:48, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- You errased a part of the article calling it "dead link". The link at the url was not broken the content at the edit was outdated. Avoid errasing content as a whole because of dead link. Try to be more constructive, ask before errasing.Mr.User200 (talk) 18:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- The archived link was not working for me when I tried to access it, as explained above. Here come the Suns (talk) 18:28, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- You errased a part of the article calling it "dead link". The link at the url was not broken the content at the edit was outdated. Avoid errasing content as a whole because of dead link. Try to be more constructive, ask before errasing.Mr.User200 (talk) 18:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 June 2022
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The outcome of the conflict was not clear, as the conflict mutated into a war. The war was a draw and the conflict was only a precursor to war. I ask that the outcome be changed to "inconclusive". QPY66 (talk) 21:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Not done for now: This is actually a controversial edit, so you'll need to discuss first with other editors. Please open a new section here and start a discussion. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)