Talk:2000 French Grand Prix
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Nascarking in topic GA Review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2000 French Grand Prix article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2000 French Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 6, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2000 French Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Any number between one and twelve should be spelled out.
- Corrected the number issue Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Any number between one and twelve should be spelled out.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- The pictures of Coulthard and Häkkinen could be moved down a little, but it's not a deal-breaker.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass:
- Just fix the minor issue with the spelling out of numbers that should be and this will be a pass.--Nascar king 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Nascarking: All the issues have been fixed. Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Then I hereby give 2000 French Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 19:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Nascarking: All the issues have been fixed. Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Just fix the minor issue with the spelling out of numbers that should be and this will be a pass.--Nascar king 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Pass:
