Talk:2004 United States presidential election in the District of Columbia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: District of Columbia / Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections.

Black and White liberals and Kerry's triumph in D.C

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article states : This illustrates the rejection of George W. Bush by Black voters, who are a majority in the district. NPOV violation? although even most of the White vote in DC are liberal - how else can Democratic candidates get such large margins?

Maybe we can add to the introduction a sentence such as :

This enormous Democratic vote is the combination of both the importance of the Black vote and of a very liberal White vote in this city, where many people are civil servants.

Does anyone disagree ?--Revas 18:18, 18 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

broken link

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The link on the san francisco study is broken. Can anyone fix it ? I can't find the right site ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.48.136.254 (talk) 12:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States presidential election in the District of Columbia, 2004. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20050406031417/http://www.dcboee.org:80/information/elec_2004/pres_general_2004_results.shtm to http://www.dcboee.org/information/elec_2004/pres_general_2004_results.shtm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic