Wikipedia

Talk:List of earthquakes in 2010

(Redirected from Talk:2010 earthquakes)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by PrimeBOT in topic Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
Learn more about this page

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Richard Wi-Afedzi.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Table

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Having a table like in List of earthquakes in Chile would be nice. --DAI (Δ) 10:53, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

See List of 21st century earthquakes#2010, which covers most of them. Mikenorton (talk) 08:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

---Even though it's confirmed that the earthquake in Elazig is 6.0, the infobox at the bottom still shows 5.9. Anyone willing to fix that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.184.32.30 (talk) 15:35, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Is that a lot?

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Have the earthquakes this year been more numerous and severe than average, or is it too early to say that? -68.185.195.219 (talk) 18:39, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

surf here http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/year/graphs.php --DAI (Δ) 22:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, that's a very interesting link. -68.185.195.219 (talk) 04:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Eureka

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There was an earthquake in Eureka. Sadly the link points not to a specific town called Eureka. Should be fixed. -- 95.117.247.220 (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

This earthquake should not be in bold on the template as no one died from this quake. The requirement is 30 deaths, I would fix it but I do not know how to do it. (Weather130 (talk) 02:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC))Reply

You might want to add this one to the list

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Sakhalin, Russia, today. Magnitude 6.0.

http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/world/moderate-earthquake-hits-russian-island-of-sakhalin_100335269.html

89.179.216.148 (talk) 18:23, 16 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

also, Grand Cayman January 19 (5.8) Venezuela January 15 (5.6) Argentina January 17 (6.3) Guatemala January 18 (6.0) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.83.13.134 (talk) 13:04, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Suitable management of this article

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion

In my opinion, I think this article should be restricted to earthquakes that are at least of magnitude 4.5, unless they are notable in some way i.e. cause some sort of damage, injuries or death. Earthquakes of under 4.5MM occur very regularly, the greater majority of them are only mentioned on USGS and related web sites, and not mentioned in any news sources due to lack of notability. On USGS, only earthquakes of 4.5MM and above are shown in bold print. If people keep adding these lower-magnitude quakes to the list then not only is the list going to become too long, but also it is going to be very difficult to keep count of them all. Justmeagain83 (talk) 20:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

With suitable management this could potentially be a useful article, however at the moment it is just seeming like an invitation for editors to add random insignificant earthquakes that just make the list unnecessarily long. Since there are as many as 1500 quakes above magnitude 5 per year I would suggest listing only earthquakes of magnitude 6 or larger. Smaller ones should only be added when they when they cause casualties or are notable for some other reason. It is the only way this article can be made to work. RapidR (talk) 20:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I guess I will make an attempt at managing this article a little more than it has been. I'll start with a 6.0 cut off, I do think there can notable earthquakes below this level but I'm not exactly sure what criteria should be used. --Tmckeage (talk) 00:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

-I would have gone with a 5.0 cut off myself. i admit the fours were a bit much, but to remove all the fives too? erases the point of reference for all of us who like numbers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gethsemanic (talk • contribs) 01:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well I'm certainly not saying that an earthquake below 6.0M can't be included, just that it requires some sort of justification for inclusion. According to the USGS there are about:
1 earthquake above 8.0 per year
17 earthquakes between 7.0 and 7.9 per year
134 earthquakes between 6.0 and 6.9 per year
1319 earthquakes between 5.0 and 5.9 per year
Obviously a list of over 100 earthquakes per month becomes unwieldy and important data gets lost in the noise. Perhaps if a small table was included each month that reported the number of each range of earthquakes while only actually listing those above a certain threshold would satisfy those seeking notable events and those seeking numbers. I'll try to figure out how to make a table in wikipedia :-(--Tmckeage (talk) 02:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm beginning to think that all listings of individual earthquakes should be notable regardless of their magnitude, any other criteria just seems arbitrary. I also think individual entries need to be standardized although I'm quiet sure what that standardization should be. Basically a location, magnitude, a link to the quakes wikipedia article, and a short sentence or two to provide differentiation. Input on this would be appreciated. --Tmckeage (talk) 10:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The removal of the 2010 Central Canada earthquake, though it registered 5.0 in magnitude, is unjustified. It is notable, largely due to the rarity of such events in the region and its scope. 216.234.60.106 (talk) 14:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Inaccuracies

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Alot of the information on this page is either inaccurate or woefully out of date. I can't even figure out what the table titled "Earthquakes by Nations" means. I'm working to get it up to speed but there should probably be some sort of banner saying hey don't trust this page, unfortunately I don't know how to put up banners or find one that suits my needs so if someone with the know how could do that it would be awesome --Tmckeage (talk) 03:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

OK I went ahead and deleted the table "Earthquakes by Nations". I assumed it was trying to list earthquakes by nations by an arbitrary limit. I felt there was little to no useful information to be taken from this table as the varying magnitude limits made it impossible to compare data. I could see the table being brought back if some standard limit was introduced but until then I feel the inclusion of this table severely detracts from the article. --Tmckeage (talk) 04:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Papua New Guinea

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I added the Papua New Guinea earthquake to the "April" section. I'm assuming USGS sources are acceptable. --asdadogs (talk) 01:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've used USGS sources to verify most of the recent earthquakes and cite them, but in future can contributors please include a reference with their edits. Thanks. --asdadogs (talk) 13:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi.....you forgot to include the 6.3 earthquake that struck the northern coast of Japan on June 18. The article was contributed by the Associated Press. I thought it should be included. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dissident fairy (talk • contribs) 00:41, 21 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

23rd July Mindanao Earthquake.

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It appears that the aftershocks have been listed as well, if someone knows which one of the three listed earthquakes is the first, can they remove the aftershocks? Thanks.--Mithril712 (talk) 13:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Something wrong with the figures...

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There's something wrong with the decade-long average table at the top of the article. How can the yearly average for 5.0-9.9 be (a) less than the yearly average for 5.0-5.9, and (b) be less than the 5.0-9.9 figure for any individual year? I suspect some recalculation is necessary here... Grutness...wha? 06:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Concur with Grutness. See edits by Giggles416 (talk · contribs) for example. They are changing figures, with no edit summary, no sources and don't bother to see that the "Total" figures add up! See this edit and this edit. What's happened to wp:Verify? I followed them here from other articles ie. 2010 eruptions of Mount Merapi, where they were also changing data without references! - 220.101 talk\Contribs 15:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010 Kerman province eathquake

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

7 were reported dead and just over 100 hurt in a relatively sparsely populated and rural area of Kerman province after a magnitude-6.5 earthquake hit an area between the cities of Zahedan and Bam. according to state-run Press TV on the 20th. The governor general of Kerman province told the IRNA news agency that the death toll would probably start to rise as rescuers found more dead and injured in the rubble. The ground tremors were felt as far away as the Pakistan-Afghanistan border[1][2].--82.11.99.44 (talk) 10:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/12/21/iran.earthquake/?hpt=T1
  2. ^ At least seven killed, hundreds injured in Iran quake
See December 2010 Iran earthquake. ~AH1(TCU) 00:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on List of earthquakes in 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 16 external links on List of earthquakes in 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 23 external links on List of earthquakes in 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of earthquakes in 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_earthquakes_in_2010&oldid=1207839546"