Talk:2013–14 Persian Gulf Cup

(Redirected from Talk:2013–14 Iran Pro League)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Quotas

edit

Isnt there any quotas for foreigners? It is there in all other Asian football leagues. RRD13 (talk) 16:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

first of all not all Iranian teams use foreign players plus they are only allow to use 3 non Iranian football players for every match, whats the reason to have a section for foreign players? where does it say that is mandatory? s90ra — Preceding undated comment added 02:40, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
I agree with s90ra. I really dosen't need. The foreign players in IPL are not big names and many clubs don't use foreign players. GTVM92 (talk) 08:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2013–14 Persian Gulf Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply