Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
Requested Moves
Notice: This is a subsidiary article of then main article "Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant". The name in the article title of this article that names the entity against which military intervention is occurring should remain the same as the main article (when that changes so should this one). -- PBS (talk) 14:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NigeriaWikipedia:WikiProject NigeriaTemplate:WikiProject NigeriaNigeria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
It's just wrong to list them in the losses on the coalition side. Civilians should be listed below, while non combat losses should just not be counted or listed below as they are not direct effects of the military confrontation.
Also, IS does not operate any MiG aircraft. Controlling an air-frame is very different from using it. 600 tanks look really far fetched.
The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan did not "cease to exist in 2021"
Latest comment: 2 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan currently has status as a rump state. The Permanent Representative of Afghanistan to the United Nations article lists the most recent appointment taking place on the 9th of February 2022. The Taliban administration, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, is not recognized by any country as the government of Afghanistan. Many countries still maintain ties with the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan was never formally dissolved. Multiple embassies & consulates of Afghanistan in various countries, are still under the control of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. This claim that the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan ceased to exist in 2021 is not supported by any sources. Even if the Taliban has de facto control over Afghanistan, that does not mean that the previous government ceased to exist. It still very much exists, but does not control territory within Afghanistan. --JasonMacker (talk) 20:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Embassies and consulates are not fighting a war against the Islamic State. That's ridiculous. And consensus was reached to say it no longer exits, see Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. The CIA world factbook refers to the Islamic Republic as a former government. It has been stated repeatedly by RS that the Afghan government collapsed: [1], [2]. The Journal of Democracystates plainly: "The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan ended on 15 August 2021." There is a mountain of sources saying this. ― Tartan357Talk20:13, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
You added a note to the contrary without any sources. Without sources, this is original research. I can find no evidence that the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is in any way fighting the Islamic State in 2022—that is an outlandish claim. ― Tartan357Talk20:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
If you looked at the List of diplomatic missions of Afghanistan, you'd see that the United States closed the embassy of Afghanistan. However, most countries still maintain their embassies. So trying to present the US government's position as the international consensus is a violation of WP:NPOV. Your claim that I provided "no sources" is a bit misleading. It is more accurate to state that I provided no 'additional' sources. The CNN article used as a source refers to the Taliban-led government, which is named the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. The fact that I changed "Taliban" to "Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan" to be in line with the CNN source does not mean I didn't present any sources. If you see the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, you will see that nowhere does the article state that the IRA ceased to exist. Instead, it states that it ruled Afghanistan from 2001-2021, which is true. I'll be more than happy to provide additional sources, but I have to do stuff in real life and can't hang around on Wikipedia forever. Looking forward to working with other editors in improving this article and the associated template. --JasonMacker (talk) 20:49, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
When I say you didn't add sources, I'm referring to your claim that the IRA is a rump state. I fail to see how diplomatic missions matter. Are these diplomatic missions engaged in armed conflict against the Islamic State? This is not a diplomatic page having anything to do with the legal status of Afghanistan. It is a war article. The IRA ceased to be engaged in armed conflict against the Islamic State in 2021. ― Tartan357Talk20:51, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
It's not like I invented this idea. Look at Republican insurgency in Afghanistan, and History of Afghanistan, and Amrullah Saleh, which make it clear that the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is a government-in-exile that was never formally dissolved and is still contesting Afghanistan in an ongoing republican insurgency.
The diplomatic missions matter in that the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is not dissolving and is still actively involved in being the de jure government of Afghanistan recognized by a large number of countries. They are still providing consular services (such as records of births and marriages) using Islamic Republic of Afghanistan documentation.
In any case, the template should make it clear that the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan is now the main force fighting against the Islamic State in Afghanistan, and that the rump state of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan no longer has the capacity to conduct official operations against the Islamic State. I can't find any sources for NRF attacks on Islamic State after 2021.--JasonMacker (talk) 03:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
It is not a rump state, and all of the articles you point to actually take pains to clarify that there is no actual government in exile, just claims from some people that went nowhere. Reliable sources do not consider Saleh (who fled Afghanistan in September) or the NRF to be running a government in exile. No country has recognized or provided aid to him. We are long past this, there were fights over this at Saleh's article and the IRA article and it was determined that there was no continuation of the old government. The article you point to, Republican insurgency in Afghanistan, specifically says "Islamic Republics of Afghanistan loyalists" and contains the following note:
Though the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan ceased to exist on 15 August 2021, many soldiers, officials and other loyalists relocated to Panjshir and rallied under its banner. These elements and exiled officials claimed to maintain the republic in some form,[5][6] with Amrullah Saleh styling himself "caretaker" president.
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The lead sentence seems like it was copy pasted from another article. "Many states (which ones?) began (referencing a nonexistent time frame) to intervene against the Islamic State, (no definition/hint of what the Islamic State is) in both the Syrian Civil War and the War in Iraq (2013–2017), (is it part of another war or its own conflict?) in response to its (ambiguous pronoun: the many states? The Islamic state?) rapid territorial gains from its 2014 Northern Iraq offensives, universally (word to watch) condemned executions, human rights abuses and the fear of further spillovers of the Syrian Civil War. " The last part is just a run-on sentence, with the subject changing multiple times. I am going to work on rewriting this so it conforms with the manual of style. An uninformed 3rd party is just going to be even more confused reading it: I know I was. Any help would be appreciated.AtramentousAlabaster (talk) 17:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply