Talk:2015 Football League One play-off final

2015 Football League One play-off final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 12, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed
September 19, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted
January 24, 2024	Good topic removal candidate	Demoted

Current status: Good article

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[hat-trick#Associatio football|hat-trick]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

GA Review

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Football League One play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: EchetusXe (talk · contribs) 06:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

I have made changes that I saw were needed myself. Added a couple 'what happened next' for the man of the match and Swindon manager. Cleared up the EFL / Football League name consistency issues, just removing them both from the equation.

Not sure how the images became free to use but well done to whoever got the permission for them on here.

It's a pretty simple article, on one singular match, so not much else to say. Well done!--Echetus Xe 06:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic