Talk:2016 Football League Two play-off final/GA1

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 08:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Going to review this for the GAN March 2021 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 08:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit

Route to the final

edit

Background

edit

Summary

edit

Post-match

edit

Shall place the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above MWright96 (talk) 09:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

MWright96 thanks very much for the review, I believe I've addressed most of your concerns, and responded to everything above. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!)
@The Rambling Man: Now promoting to GA class MWright96 (talk) 19:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply