This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Unreliable propaganda?? Al-Masdar pro-regime site is now can claim if there is a group or no in rebels areas?, is al-masdar have even single reporter in rebels areas?
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Al-Masdar "got not sources inside rebels areas" is claiming in Jobar offensive article that CHECHEN groups existed in jobar and that 100% wrong """This is not territory change by the way"""
also it claims that Tahrir al-sham is involved ?? there is no single video or any source to prove that claims also this is not """territory change""" ,, it's pure propaganda and lies and we can't let readers read lies that got no single prove on the ground, unless you are ok to do that??
i'm ok with territory changes "if you want to take al-masdar as a source for that", but anything other than that is propaganda.
al-masdar got no sources or reporters inside rebels areas, so can't say that HTS is particulate in jobar unless the other side "rebels" released a video proved that HTS existed in Jobar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamiAlrifaie (talk • contribs) 17:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}