Talk:Global energy crisis (2021–2023)

(Redirected from Talk:2021–present global energy crisis)
Latest comment: 8 months ago by 2001:A62:1526:F902:5C89:D022:D4CE:E6AC in topic French nuclear power failure

Requested move 9 October 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to 2021 global energy crisis. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


2021 Global Energy Crisis2021 Global energy crisis – does not meet criteria for capitalization. Legendary Whistler 5 (talk) 20:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Incorrect data in image

edit

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:European_Countries_Dependent_On_Russian_Natural_Gas.webp

Bulgaria is a part of the European Union unlike the existing data. Amitwik1i (talk) 12:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

French nuclear power failure

edit

Nuclear power in France is down to about 50% after several plants failed due to corrosion. Repairs will take months or years. Why was this obvious problem omitted?  Matthead  Discuß   18:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

What was French nuclear output in 2023? 2001:A62:1526:F902:5C89:D022:D4CE:E6AC (talk) 21:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Russo-Ukrainian (what?)

edit

Since there is no official declaring war to each other from the both sides, I insist on the definition «military conflict», this is what's really going on. Also «Rosso» is correlating more to culture, language, not to the certain country, so better is «Russia-Ukraine». Владимир Казаринов (talk) 07:07, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sure so the Vietnam war, the Gulf war, the war in Iraq, or the war in Afghanistan were not wars either then everyone is squeaky clean! 193.196.193.50 (talk) 13:58, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Well, it's a matter of definition, at what scale should a military conflict enlarge to become a «war»? Undoubtful criteria is a general mobilization, which is, as I know, didn't take place in all that cases, in current Russian-Ukranian too. In media, headlines mode they say «a war», but we're in encyclopedia mode, which means objectivity. Sides could be far from squeaky cleanness even in a street fight, not a criteria at all. Владимир Казаринов (talk) 16:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

It is a war in Ukraine. Definitelly. --Mats33 (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit info

edit

Hi! I am planning to add a rather substantial amount of information to this page, using among other things information and statistics from this IEA webpage. I think that this would improve the quality of the page quite a lot, but want to inform about it here first, if any of you would have any other thoughts. Thanks! EnergyAnalyst2 (talk) 15:24, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Global?"

edit

Basically the entire article is about europe. Title should be changed to European or information about the rest of the world actually added. Bomberswarm2 (talk) 06:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nuclear power

edit

This article mentions the word "nuclear" only once (in relation to the rounding error of power that was lost at some French reactors due to high temperatures). Of course there were other issues with French nuclear in 2022 but the article doesn't mention them, either.

Meanwhile the article nowhere mentions this or various national policy decisions of a similar nature. Nor does the word "uranium" appear once in the article - even though oil, coal and gas do numerous times.?. 2001:A62:1526:F902:5C89:D022:D4CE:E6AC (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply