Talk:4th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate)
(Redirected from Talk:4th Missouri Infantry (Confederate))
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Hog Farm in topic Wrong flag
4th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 28, 2021. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of 4th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate) was copied or moved into User:Hog Farm/Barrett's Missouri Battery with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the flag of the 4th Missouri Infantry (Confederate) is on display at the Museum of the Confederacy? Source
- ALT1:... that the 4th Missouri Infantry (Confederate) suffered 129 casualties at the Second Battle of Corinth? Source 3 in the text, McGhee 2008
- ALT2:... that the flag (design pictured) of the 4th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate) is on display at the Museum of the Confederacy? Source
Moved to mainspace by Hog Farm (talk). Self-nominated at 04:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC).
- Article length of over 6000 characters is good for the new article. Age of 3 days is fine. No copyvio or plagiarism concerns. Reliable sources are used. QPQ has been done. Article is Good To Go.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Doug Coldwell: - I've added an image and a new hook to reflect the image if you'd be alright with reviewing those. Thanks! Hog Farm (talk) 19:18, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- ALT2 = Yup. Image approved. Everything is Good To Go.--Doug Coldwell (talk)
- Comment to Promoter. Could this one be put into the # 1 position in the queue. Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:41, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Wrong flag
editThe national flag in the infobox is the wrong one. The flag depicted was not adopted until 1865, but the regiment that is the subject of this article existed in 1862 only. The "Stars and Bars" is the national flag they would have carried. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 01:07, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Figured out how to fix it. Isn't open-source grand? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 01:11, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Piledhigheranddeeper: - That's what I get for copying infobox code from somewhere else with a unit that was active in 1865. Looks like I'll need to go check that on a couple others as well. Hog Farm Talk 01:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I believe I should have it corrected for all of those in the series that weren't active in 1865. Hog Farm Talk 01:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Piledhigheranddeeper: - That's what I get for copying infobox code from somewhere else with a unit that was active in 1865. Looks like I'll need to go check that on a couple others as well. Hog Farm Talk 01:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)