Talk:FN 5.7×28mm/GA1
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- Well-written
- Variations section - List time of service for all bullets listed unless already noted. Some section have them introduced while one has them discontinued. Are some of these variations still in use? If so, state it.
- SS190 duty subsection
- In the first sentence of the second paragraph, when did the Houston Police Department test these bullets?
- Specifications section
- Define P90 muzzle velocity, P90 muzzle energy, Bullet type, and Effective range listed in the first column of the table.
- Controversey section
- In the first sentence of the lead paragraph, when did the controversey for the civilian shooters take for the 5.7x28 mm first take place? For the second sentence of the lead paragraph, when did the Brady Campaign make claim on the SS192 testing? Also WP:WEASEL on Brady Campaign "claimed".
- In the lead sentence of the second paragraph, spell out Five-seven as FN Five-Seven. Also, when were the 5.7x28mm subject to the controversey? Specify?
- Factually accurate and verifiable.
- For all sources, list the publisher in italics. See WP:MOS on italics for more information.
- Reference #2, put (in French) in sourcing since this is written in the French language.
- Link not confirmed in Reference #36.
- Reference #39 is the same as Reference #8. Merge.
- Reference #40 is the same as Reference #15. Merge.
- Reference #42 only shows an image instead of a print. Why is an image being used as a reference?
- Broad
- Covers all aspects of the bullet's history. - No issues.
- Neutral
- No issues - Covers all aspects of the bullet.
- Stable
- Last edit done prior to review was on April 30, 2010.
- Images
- All images shown are valid. - No issues.
- Overall
- Hold. Some minor edits needed, but can be done.
Reviewer: Chris (talk) 13:29, 6 May 2010 (UTC)