Talk:7.65×21mm Parabellum

(Redirected from Talk:7.65x22mm Parabellum)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Goldenbirdman in topic Police use

Title

edit

7.65x22mm Parabellum

Title must be 7.65x21mm Parabellum

--Garreta (talk) 22:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Garreta 23:55 01-01-2008Reply


-- Moved to 7.65x21mm Parabellum Samuelkowal906]

Subguns in 7.65mm Parabellum

edit

Quickload, I have no doubt you know a lot about Bergmann MPs. But it is a fact that the Finns ordered a number of them in 7.65 Parabellum and also issued Suomi M/31s in that caliber. I will dig up the reference and reinstate that.

Some of the edits here do not follow standard capitalization and are not in complete sentences. We should tidy those up.

Also, that is a very neat pic of the Swiss 7.65 box - however, wouldn't a picture of the cartridge itself be more appropriate for the article? Twalls (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Finns ordered SIG Bergmann 1920 not MP 18. Suomi 26 were in 7.65

Edmond HUET (talk) 20:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

That is true - so why was the reference deleted and not fixed? This article is about the cartridge, and the several firearms chambered in that caliber are of direct relevance. Twalls (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I reinstated the partial list of handguns in 7.65 Luger and included your helpful corrections in the subguns in this caliber as well. Twalls (talk) 21:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Some pictures of SIG Bergmann 1920, enjoy!

http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z69/Quickload/German%20SMGs/SIG%20Bergmann/SIGBergmann1920B.jpg http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z69/Quickload/German%20SMGs/SIG%20Bergmann/SIGBergmann1920SA.jpg http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z69/Quickload/German%20SMGs/SIG%20Bergmann/SIGBergmann1920.jpg

Edmond HUET (talk) 16:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Police use

edit

This was a popular police cartridge in europe back in the day, along with the .32 ACP. Someone please add a blurb about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenbirdman (talkcontribs) 10:03, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply