Talk:AACTA Awards

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.

Australia: Cinema High‑importance

	Australia portal AACTA Awards is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Awards High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Separate pages for each award?

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Is this customary? (Goes to check Oscars and Grammy Awards) Hmm, seems to be. Grammy Awards also has pages for awards by year, which seems a more natural listing to me, but I guess both are useful.

Are there any guidelines or 'model pages' when it comes to writing about awards? I am doing some editing on the ARIAs at the moment. pfctdayelise 15:56, 20 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I created some of those separate pages. I felt that each award deserves an entry, as well as each award ceremony. That way, you can see the AFI Awards by award, or by year. Others may see this as excessive. Cnwb 23:35, 20 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I almost feel as though the pages are all so small they could almost be on one article, but I like the idea of being able to see by year (ceremony) or award. Peter 02:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Trivia deleted - suggestion

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Lots of other wikipedia articles include trivia. Maybe these details could be incorporated into the article instead? What do others think? Roaming27 20:58, 24 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

The following was deleted by Cyberjunkie:

AFI Trivia
- * In 2005, it was hosted by Russell Crowe
- * In 2006, it was hosted by Geoffrey Rush, and the ceremony aired on the Nine Network

External links
- *www.altfg.com/awards/2006/australian-film-institute.htm
- *www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,20814379-5005961,00.html

Yes it is useful information, but could be tabulated similar to other awards articles. Peter 00:21, 25 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

WP:NPOV and controversies

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a section that rips into the AFI awards harshly and mostly without references. I have tried to tone it down, confine it more to the material where the references are clear. At one point the text made reference to two articles: “Noyce: hands off film industry’ and ‘Cultural exchange, just do it our way’ in The Age. However these need to be properly cited and the exact nature of their claims and evidence spelt out. Cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 12:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on AACTA Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on AACTA Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on AACTA Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AACTA Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613043438/http://www.afi.org.au/AM/ContentManagerNet/HTMLDisplay.aspx?ContentID=10682&Section=History_of_AFI to http://www.afi.org.au/AM/ContentManagerNet/HTMLDisplay.aspx?ContentID=10682&Section=History_of_AFI

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

International awards - new cats and updated names

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have added mention of the 1st international awards in the history section, updated the current list of categories in the International awards, and made headings to make it clearer. However it looks as if some of the current articles need renaming in the light of the new cats, and also at some point new articles made for the new cats. Also, in my opinion, it seems more logical to put the category list ahead of the ceremony section, and/or make the latter a hidden list as well. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic