Talk:BAC/Dassault AFVG/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   What page # for cite 12? I'd move Willox down to the References and adjust the cites accordingly. Consolidate cites 1 and 13. Corrected, actually only one is a quote from Willox, the other being Croup Captain Heron, cited in two instances, cite and bibliographic reference provided.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   One cite needed. Now added.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I believe I have addressed your comments. Standing by for further instructions. Kyteto (talk) 23:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC) Corrected some sections today, notably lede and BAC P.45 background. Bzuk (talk) 15:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Almost forgot, need the page # from Wood for the specifications.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

That has now been added, with help from other editors. Kyteto (talk) 13:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)