Talk:Bell AH-1Z Viper

(Redirected from Talk:AH-1Z Viper)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by LayneDunbar in topic Unexplained appendages

Viper name?

edit

I guess we can just keep it as "Viper" unless/until something different comes out officially. Thanks for moving these over Bill!. -Fnlayson (talk) 00:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

For the record, this is a story from MCAS Miramar that clalls the AH-1Z the "Viper". Of course, the use the nickname "Zulu" throughout the rest of the article! - BilCat (talk) 08:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unexplained appendages

edit

Does anyone know the function of the probe/antenna in front of the canopy? Thanks, Hayden120 (talk) 14:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have not seen any images with something like that on a AH-1Z. But if it is a red/orange color, then it is a test probe, a pitot tube probably. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Every picture of the AH-1Z I have seen has it. Unless I'm going insane? You can see it in the images above this section. It is forward and slightly left of the canopy, and protrudes almost vertically with the tip bent to the left. In those images there is a protective cover on the end. I thought at first it may be a Pitot tube, but I had always thought they had to face directly forward to function. Hayden120 (talk) 00:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Sorry, I see what you meant now. It's the angled tube. Older pictures in a book show what appears to be a shorter version attached rear of the canopy. I can not find it identified in the Bell AH-1Z guide or 2 books I have. Must be some type of flight instrumentation or sensor. ?? -Fnlayson (talk) 01:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
It may be a sensor measure the air going into the engine, but that's just a guess. -SidewinderX (talk) 20:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I think it's a refueling mechanism, like on jets. Thetricker01 (talk) 02:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)TrickerThetricker01 (talk) 02:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

No it's not for refueling - It’s Low speed omni-directional air data sensor, they used on the AH-1S as well :seen here FOX 52 (talk) 07:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

And see here for what an in-flight refueling probe on a helicopter looks like. It's the very large, long pole sticking straight out in front of the helicopter so the refueling basket doesn't get caught in the rotor blades. - BilCat (talk) 07:49, 22 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

I work on this aircraft, can confirm it’s an air data sensor. Basically it’s a weather vane that tells the pilots which way the wind is blowing, both by sight and by digital readouts. LayneDunbar (talk) 13:57, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Needs Updating

edit

There's a video on YouTube showing an AH-1Z providing CAS to Marines of 1-2 Marines, Echo company. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmysGwGD9_o I don't have time to find the information and add it, but I'd just like to throw that out there so we can update the Operational history segment of the article. Thanks Pilotstockle (talk) 01:12, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Looks like the AH-1 has a 2-blade main rotor when the video is paused. So probably an AH-1W. There needs to be verifiable reference for this to add to the article. -fnlayson (talk) 04:17, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

IOC is 2011, not 2010

edit

http://australianaviation.com.au/2011/03/ioc-for-ah-1z/

Does anybody have a second source for this? Hcobb (talk) 15:24, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

NAVAIR Press Release - SidewinderX (talk) 15:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
I think they expected 2011, but they were able to complete it early. To clarify, the Operational Evaluation was passed in 2010. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comment

edit

That's best attack helicopter I've ever seen. --88.251.81.141 (talk) 09:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/supcobra/
    Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Bell AH-1Z Viper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply