Talk:Aarhus

(Redirected from Talk:Aarhus/Comments)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Femke in topic GAR
Good articleAarhus has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 2, 2014Good article nomineeListed
January 29, 2023Good article reassessmentKept
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 12, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in 1944 a precision bombing raid on the Gestapo's Aarhus headquarters destroyed all its files?
Current status: Good article

GAR

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Kept - issues have been addressed. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

A GA from 2014. Some uncited material that needs to be cited. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Will look into this over the next few days.--Ipigott (talk) 19:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
As far as I can see, there are no longer any unreferenced passages in the article. Please let me know, Onegreatjoke, if any further work is needed.--Ipigott (talk) 14:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Ipigott: There's "In the 1980s the city entered a period of rapid growth[clarification needed]" at the Post-World War II years section and that's it from what i can see. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Onegreatjoke: I missed this as it was from 2017. Now OK I hope.--Ipigott (talk) 16:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Seems good. Though I will wait for the opinions of other people Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Keep - I don't quite understand what exactly needs to be addressed, "Some uncited material" is a very general comment. I'm opposed to just unlisting a GA all of a sudden. It's the easiest route. I think sources in the lead are not necessary, but other than that, at the moment, it looks like a very well-sourced, and indeed, good article. Please be more specific as to what needs to be addressed. ShahidTalk2me 11:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Spelling = grammar?

edit

in the paragrapgh 'Spelling'

shouldn't it state that either spelling is *orthographically* correct, instead of saying "grammatically"?

-- by the way: why is this article locked?