Talk:Ibrahim ibn Yaqub

(Redirected from Talk:Abraham ben Jacob)
Latest comment: 14 days ago by Srnec in topic Brill source

Should this article be moved?

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Andrewa (talk) 08:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


Abraham ben Jacob → ? – According to the opening sentence, Abraham ben Jacob was better known under his Arabic name of Ibrâhîm ibn Ya`qûb al-Tartushi. WP:COMMONNAME says we should name things using "the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources". I would argue that any of the Arabic redirects to this article (Ibrahim ibn Jakub, Ibrahim ibn Jaqub, Ibrahim ibn Yaqub al-Tartushi, Ibrahim ibn Yaqub, Íbrahím ibn Jaqúb, Ibrahim Ibn Jacub, Ibrahim ibn Jacub, Ibrahim ibn Ahmed At-Tartûschi, Ibrahim ibn Ya'kub, or Ibrāhīm ibn Yaʿqūb al-IsrāʾAīlī al-Turṭushi) is a better name than the current Hebrew name. For simplicity's sake, I personally favor Ibrahim ibn Yaqub as it involves no diacritics or unusual spellings. What do other editors think? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:23, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Article lede post move

edit

User:Malik Shabazz, I had a look at updating the lede to comply to the MOS after the move, but I decided I'd just make a mess if I tried (despite speaking a little Turkish!).

Could you handle this (either personally or by delegation), or should I raise it with an appropriate WikiProject or similar? TIA Andrewa (talk) 08:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Will do. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 11:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Mohuč, on the map

edit

On the map, "Mohuč" is the Czech name for the German city Mainz. Acwilson9 (talk) 05:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Inconsistent map

edit

The map is inconsistent with the article content, since the journey shown there does not start from his native town, Tolosa, does not enter into Poland (although he could have talked of it as per stories heard, which is unlikely), does not cross Italy and shows a "return" to Cordoba whereas the article states that nothing is known of his travelling back. 194.78.194.24 (talk) 18:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Brill source

edit

@StarkReport: In this edit, you added the citation M. Brett and E. Reinfelder, Ibrahim Ibn Ya'qub's Account of Northern and Eastern Europe (965-969): A Translation of the Kitab al-Istibsar, (Leiden: Brill, 2015). This book does not appear to exist. Can you explain? Srnec (talk) 04:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oddly enough, I can't remember this edit, it's possible the source I accessed was a rare or out-of-print edition. Nonetheless, conducting research on this topic again, I found some sources regarding Yaqub's mention of the Jewish community: The Jews of Bohemia and Moravia: Facing the Holocaust(Page No: 8), and Languages of Community: The Jewish Experience in the Czech Lands(Page No: 11), as well as, I think Aish whose article I recently edited.
As for Yaqub's description of Mieszko I’s reign: Arab travelers about Poland. The image of Ibrahim Ibn Yaqub and the image of the Slavs(Page No:222) that states "most important source material regarding the beginnings of Mieszko I’s reign, the most unique pieces of information Ibrāhīm disclosed on Poland were those concerning the internal affairs of this young state (especially the prince’s druzhina, literally: fellowship) and those confirming or specifying certain issues related to the wars led by Mieszko I. " and Page No:225 that states "So far, it has been one of the most important sources of the Polish medieval history. Some fragments of Ibrāhīm’s account, e.g. the description of Mieszko I’s country, can be found in every book on the history of Poland." StarkReport (talk) 09:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I can find no reference to any work published by Brill by Brett and Reinfelder. "M. Brett" would be Michael Brett, but I have no idea who Reinfelder is. The citation looks like an AI concoction. Srnec (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply