Talk:Sandblasting
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merge
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Merged. Still needs some more cleanup. Wizard191 (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Isn't sandblasting just a type of abrasive blasting? Any reason not to merge? ike9898 (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
I agree, these pages can be merged.97.127.23.147 (talk) 16:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Mis-targeted link
editThe autobody link is clearly wrong, links to a band, not whatever the process is. --88.108.173.78 (talk) 22:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed. DMacks (talk) 22:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Where is Sandblasting?
editSandblasting redirects to this article, but this article barely mentions sandblasting. If there's a reason for that, it should be explained in the lede. Otherwise, somebody please supply some copy regarding sandblasting! J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 18:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
On further reading, I see that some sections do discuss sandblasting. It should, however, be included expressly in the "Types" section. J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 19:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)