Talk:Abu Bakr Alahdal
(Redirected from Talk:Abu Bakr Ibn Ali Muhhammad Alahdal)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Iqinn in topic removal of valid and useful wikilinks
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
rough work
editThese links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors. Geo Swan (talk) 22:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
| CSRT allegations | 74-75 |
| ARB 1 allegations | 93-95 |
| ARB 2 allegations | 48-51 |
| ARB 3 allegations | 82-85 |
- Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket. It is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Abu Bakr Ibn Ali Muhhammad Alahdal. IQinn (talk) 10:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
removal of valid and useful wikilinks
editThis article is one of a series that had a number of valid and useful wikilinks removed with an edit summary "unlink interpretation of questionable source". I don't think this is a sufficient explanation, and I don't think this removal of wikilinks was a good idea.
I think the wikilinks should be restored to this article and the other articles. Geo Swan (talk) 22:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- Already explained and under discussion here and in a related discussion here. I have told you that and i have ask you multiple times in a friendly way to continue the discussions and to answer my questions. here and here and on other places. I think your behavior is disruptive. I would appreciate if you could answer the questions and continue started discussions. Thank you. IQinn (talk) 10:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)