Talk:Abu Hurayra

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abu Hurayra article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 12 months

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Islam: Hadith / Muslim scholars / Salaf High‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hadith task force (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by the Muslim scholars task force (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by the Salaf task force.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Asian / Middle East / Medieval / Early Muslim

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Asian military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

Archives

Index 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Obvious Sunni Bias

Latest comment: 10 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article became obvious sunni bias as the shia section was removed totally and there is no mentions of any critical documents against him. I readded the Shia section and the old more historically accurate Sunni section instead of the bias nonsense posted before. This article should be locked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.160.90.239 (talk) 23:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. The criticism section has turned into criticism of the criticisms. 2A01:B747:11:344:7833:6B1:5E2B:53C7 (talk) 16:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

it seems that whoever last edited this page to its current form overly relied on limited Indonesian sources which are pro Hurayra. It is of course within that user's right to present counter critism of the criticism, but the sources and the way it is presented does not seem to show good faith in arguing. It is mostly rambling, do not engage with core critism's logic, simply reiterated pro opinions, and created a strawman by making the critism section short. Is it time to edit the article to be more balanced? 182.3.52.8 (talk) 07:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 13 October 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved, lacking any clear opposition. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:39, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Abu Hurairah → Abu Hurayra – Abu Hurayra is the common Arabic transliteration per WP:MOSAR. Abu Hurayrah is also a correct transliteration of the Arabic word per the guidelines here though it is more common on Wikipedia to drop the 'h' in similar cases, e.g., Mu'awiya I instead of Mu'awiyah I. Abu Hurayra also seems to be a more common transliteration in reliable sources, e.g., the works of Madelung. TatesTopG (talk) 8:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – Ammarpad (talk) 10:00, 13 October 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 09:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Noting this article has been moved before ([1]). -Kj cheetham (talk) 23:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
No opinion on the merits, but since this has been sitting here for the better part of a week, I'm just going to assume it's potentially controversial and contest it so that others can weigh in. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.