Talk:Adela Hernández
(Redirected from Talk:Adela Hernandez)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Obiwankenobi in topic Reverted a silent revert
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Adela Hernández be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Reverted a silent revert
editI reverted an edit that silently removed four categories which I added to the article previously. One of the categories which was removed was immediately placed into a "speedy" delete queue as a "C1. Unpopulated categories".
I find Adela Hernandez fascinating. She obviously overcame a lot of setbacks in her life. I want to find out more about her and do not understand why I am being acused of being disruptive. XOttawahitech (talk) 15:06, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- I removed from those categories because WP:COP#N says "an article about a person should be categorized in terms of occupation only by the reason(s) for the person's notability" (disclosure: I've been involved in the development of WP:COP#N). Re my edit being silent - AFAIK there's no policy saying it shouldn't be (especially as it was only a partial revert). Re "disruptive" - I've replied on O's talk page. DexDor (talk) 17:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- I concur with removal of the categories. These are clearly not defining for this person. We don't categorize famous actresses as waitresses, even if they once worked in a restaurant.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 00:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC)