Talk:Adelaide Zoo

Historical controversy

This material was deleted by 218.185.75.68 without explanation and for unknown reasons, and I have reverted to to the earlier version. The reference for the information is given. If it should be removed, please diuscuss here. Maias 01:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Animals

No one gave JmaesBWatson to protect this. It's against the wiki law to protect zoo articles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adelaide_Zoo&diff=prev&oldid=455353598

These animals he reverted ARE at the Zoo. 58.7.128.239 (talk) 07:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Adelaide Zoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081102133832/http://www.news.com.au:80/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24575343-5005941,00.html to http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24575343-5005941,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Exhibits section needs to be drastically reduced, or removed altogether

I am not sure why this section belongs in this article - it reads like a directory, and Wikipedia is not a directory. The list of displays may be okay, but the detailed list of every animal is way over the top, and impractical to maintain. I am in favour of removing the entire section, or perhaps leaving just the list of major displays. Any other opinions?--Gronk Oz (talk) 13:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

 Done Since there were no dissenting views in more than a month since this was raised, I have trimmed that excessively detailed list of animals. I left the list of exhibits and the brief descriptions where they had one. --Gronk Oz (talk) 23:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Adelaide Zoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160111142512/http://apps.planning.sa.gov.au/HeritageSearch/HeritageItem.aspx?p_heritageno=1563 to http://apps.planning.sa.gov.au/HeritageSearch/HeritageItem.aspx?p_heritageno=1563
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160111142511/http://apps.planning.sa.gov.au/HeritageSearch/HeritageItem.aspx?p_heritageno=1561 to http://apps.planning.sa.gov.au/HeritageSearch/HeritageItem.aspx?p_heritageno=1561
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0%2C22049%2C24575343-5005941%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Multiple images

The several groups of related images are excellent but disturbing visually due to different heights. Perhaps someone with the necessary skills could do the honors. Doug butler (talk) 21:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC)