Talk:Brandigo China

notability

So...I'm pretty skeptical of this article. Firstly I'm not sure if the topic is notable at all. I can find various blurbs mentioning the company, but nothing substantial. Some of the references provided in the article do not seem to correlate with the things they're supposed to be referencing. This seems like a pretty clear-cut vanity page. I intend to nominate this article for WP:PROD, but I will wait a while to see if their are any objections. Deyyaz ^{[ Talk | Contribs ]} 05:35, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

I disagree as it is under the section "companies based in Shanghai", which seems to be appropriate for this article. Else this category should not exit. IMHO. 206.225.134.57 (talk) 05:16, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

I think you misunderstand me. I don't think this company is notable enough to merit an article and deeply suspect that its only reason for existing is as a form of advertising for the Adsmith company. At Wikipedia any article can be categorized, but that doesn't mean the article's subject is then notable just because it has been. Nor, in my opinion, does the deletion of this article reflect in any way on the broader notability of the category: Companies based in Shanghai. Deyyaz ^{[ Talk | Contribs ]} 01:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Adsmith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090902085807/http://www.chinaeconomicreview.com:80/cer/2007_06/Better_by_design.html to http://www.chinaeconomicreview.com/cer/2007_06/Better_by_design.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Adsmith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100417041417/http://www.haas.berkeley.edu:80/groups/pubs/calbusiness/current/feature06.html to http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/pubs/calbusiness/current/feature06.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090520063401/http://www.chinasuccessstories.com:80/2008/12/23/behind-enemy-lines/ to http://www.chinasuccessstories.com/2008/12/23/behind-enemy-lines/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.spark09.org/home/sponsor.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)