Talk:Central African rock python
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Central African rock python article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
 | This article uses text donated by Wildscreen from their ARKive project (see below). For further information, please see Wikipedia:GLAM/ARKive. |
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Wildscreen ARKive texts. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2011090810014488. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
 | On 5 June 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from African rock python to Central African rock python. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Natalensis is now a species on its own
editPlease update.
Python natalensis is now a subspecies on its own. And seperated from sebae.
https://m.facebook.com/groups/1643835265678127?view=permalink&id=1788498164545169
AWDF 09:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
https://m.facebook.com/groups/1643835265678127?view=permalink&id=1788498164545169
The previous classification was changed in 1999. So this wikipedia page needs an update.
(Previously) Northern African Rock Python P.sebae sebae Southern African Rock Python P.sebae natalensis
(After 1999) as classified by cites African Rock Python Python sebae
Southern African Python aka Natal Python Python natalensis
Natalensis is lifted to its own species.
You can contact also rangers@africanwildlifedefenceforce.com for extra verification AWDF 09:48, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- IUCN now shows "Central African python" (P. sebae) and "Southern African Rock Python" (P. natalensis) as two separate species. So does ITIS. ITIS has marked the subspecies names as invalid and the two species-level names as valid. — BarrelProof (talk) 00:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Is this an apex predator?
editI think this edit is incorrect but I don't know. Invasive Spices (talk) 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 5 June 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Uncontroversial. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- African rock python → Central African rock python
- Southern rock python → Southern African rock python
– or Python sebae and Python natalensis. ITIS and IUCN show these as separate species with the suggested article names as the primary common names. ITIS has marked the subspecies-level names as invalid and the two species-level names as valid. The Southern rock python article already includes "African" in the boldfaced common name in its opening sentence. — BarrelProof (talk) 00:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support. I don't see Central African rock python at ITIS, only at the IUCN. Reptile database uses Southern African rock python but not Central African rock python. However, before the species split, the two subspecies were commonly known as the Southern and Central African rock python (e.g. here, here and others), so the IUCN is just using the common names of the subspecies for the same snakes at species level in accord with the revised taxonomy. I see know reason not to follow the IUCN. — Jts1882 | talk 06:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
