Talk:Reactions to global surveillance disclosures

Plural

Usually these disclosures are referred to in the plural, although Snowden's disclosure is over, the disclosures in the press, those we are recording here, are plural and ongoing. petrarchan47tc 23:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

So we have:

• 2013 global surveillance disclosures
  • Timeline of mass surveillance disclosures
  • Aftermath of the global surveillance disclosure

Aftermath isn't even the correct word. The disclosures are ongoing yet the events described in this article occurred in the past. "Reactions to global surveillance disclosures" is my choice. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 08:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

---

Aftermath of the global surveillance disclosure → Reactions to global surveillance disclosures – "The disclosures are ongoing" Anonymouscoward2421 (talk) 17:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

• Support the proposed rename, to more accurately describe the contents of the article. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Restore the Fourth

Would anyone care to do the honors and merge Restore the Fourth into this article? Proposal here, no response after two weeks. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 08:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Lots of information removed

Could editors take a look at this, I'm not sure where all the removed information has gone. I know there was an attempt to add some back to the Snowden article, which is silly as these spin off articles were created because the main article is packed. petrarchan47tc 07:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

No citation of the HTTPS-massive-adoption as reaction

See the statistical growth of HTTPS from 2013 onwards... And its explosion after 2016, when cost barriers were overcome: see for example https://letsencrypt.org/stats/ and campaigns like Mozilla's https://blog.mozilla.org/internetcitizen/2017/04/21/https-protect/

Krauss (talk) 09:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• -FsA14 - Freiheit statt Angst 060 (15062050686) (2).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC)