Talk:Agonistic behaviour
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2018 and 28 November 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rseward13.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Definition of agonistic behaviour
editI am not entirely sure I would agree with the first line of this article. 'Agonistic' generally means 'competitive', as in a pair of agonistic muscles. I have always believed that agonistic behaviour is competitive behaviour rather than behaviour related solely to fighting or to aggression. Animals can be competitive without fighting or aggression (as the article points out later). There are plenty of examples such as animals pushing and shoving for food, or threats without contact. I suggest the word 'fighting' in the first line should be replaced with 'competing'. DrChrissy (talk) 19:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- This article specifically addresses agonism in ethology, where it specifically refers to fighting-related behaviors. Encyclopedia Britannica defines "agonism" in the animal behavior sense as "survivalist animal behaviour that includes aggression, defense, and avoidance". Not all competitive behaviors fall under this definition. (Competition, in biology, merely means any kind of struggle for contested resources, which is a broader topic.) 138.16.160.4 (talk) 20:05, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Having worked in ethology for over 20 years, I doubt many ethologists would agree with the rather narrow definition you cite. It seems to me that this definition means much valuable information on animal behaviour will not be available to the reader within this article. DrChrissy (talk) 16:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- I have just read the article again and he first 2 sentences are In ethology, agonistic behaviour is any social behaviour related to fighting. Thus it is broader than aggressive behaviour because it includes not only actual aggression but also threats, displays, retreats, placating aggressors, and conciliation. 'Avoidance' as given in the Encyclopedia Britannica definition cited above is included, but how can we know that an animal moving in one direction is actively avoiding fighting another and therefore whether this is 'agonistic behaviour' or 'competitive behaviour'.DrChrissy (talk) 16:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think it is noteworthy that the Encyclopedia Britannica article cited above by 138.16.160.4 does NOT contain the word 'fighting'. DrChrissy (talk) 17:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Because of the unusual definition given in the first sentence, this leads to illogical text such as section 5 'Agonistic fighting'...what then is 'non-agonistic' fighting? __DrChrissy (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- I think it is noteworthy that the Encyclopedia Britannica article cited above by 138.16.160.4 does NOT contain the word 'fighting'. DrChrissy (talk) 17:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- I have just read the article again and he first 2 sentences are In ethology, agonistic behaviour is any social behaviour related to fighting. Thus it is broader than aggressive behaviour because it includes not only actual aggression but also threats, displays, retreats, placating aggressors, and conciliation. 'Avoidance' as given in the Encyclopedia Britannica definition cited above is included, but how can we know that an animal moving in one direction is actively avoiding fighting another and therefore whether this is 'agonistic behaviour' or 'competitive behaviour'.DrChrissy (talk) 16:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Having worked in ethology for over 20 years, I doubt many ethologists would agree with the rather narrow definition you cite. It seems to me that this definition means much valuable information on animal behaviour will not be available to the reader within this article. DrChrissy (talk) 16:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deletion of section on Winner Effect
editI have accessed the source of information given by the editor who included the paragraphs on the Winner Effect. The source is a scientific paper on a study using sunfish, not mice as indicated in the WP article. This has probably been a good faith mistake, but I have deleted the section until the correct reference is given because until then, the edit is unverifiable.__DrChrissy (talk) 19:32, 30 October 2012 (UTC)