Talk:List of aircraft losses of the Vietnam War

Untitled

Hello What about te losses for the Viets ? How many aircrafts did they loos ? Are there officiaal sources for the Nort Viet loses ?

Vietnamese claims?

Can anyone bother writing down how many the Vietnamese claim they shot down? I'm pretty sure there is evidence around that the US covered up their true losses in Vietnam. Not that NVA didn't exaggerate them but still. Also wondering if these figures include the figures of the strategic bombing in support of the Khmer Rouge when they defended their "Cambodia" from Vietnamese attack/liberation?79.136.14.46 (talk) 01:15, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Sure..The NVA printed a series of stamps where they commemorated the Xth "US warplane shot down".

• On August 30, 1965 they claimed the 500th US warplane shot down (scott 374)
• On April 29 1966 they claimed the 1000th US warplane shot down (scott 423)
• On Oct 14, 1966 they claimed 1500 (scott 431)
• On June 5 1967 they claimed 2000 (scott 461-2)
• November 6, 1967 they claimed 2500 (scott 474-5)
• On June 25 1968 they claimed 3000 (scott 507-8)
• On June 20 1972 they claimed 3500 (scott 665-6)
• On October 17, 1972 they issued two stamps for the 4000th (scott numbers 675-6)
• On October 10, 1974 they issued a set of four stamps (scott 714-7) commemorating the 4181th US warplane shot down (a B52 I believe)

Those are the only claims I see from their issued stamps. Albumman64 (talk) 00:42, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Numbers don't match other reports

These figures are significantly higher than those here: Vietnam Air Losses Does anyone know the reason for the discrepancy? The figures listed at the location I gave are for combat losses over North Vietnam. I can't imagine the difference would be made up by accidents, etc. but maybe I'm wrong. Maybe the difference is aircraft which were damaged and never returned to service, but not actually shot down? Nvinen 12:42, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hmm, this [1] also disagrees, although matches much more closely the numbers presented in this article. Nvinen 12:46, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The figures I just included in the Air Force fixed-wing category were originally broken down by combat losses in "North Vietnam", "Other SEA" (Laos, South Vietnam, Thailand, and Cambodia), and "Operational." The combat losses were totalled together in the same table. There was one additional category for aircraft, "Other" which listed 255 lost to all causes, 148 in combat, and may include many of the unattributed figures I enclosed in parentheses. Buckboard 16:01, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Army Statistics

Just curious if there was a reason army figures are not in this article. The CNA seems to have not included them in their study, so maybe this is the reason, but they had a ton of helicopters that were lossed not included here if the Vietnam Heliopter Pilots Association figures are to be believed. Very frustrating trying to get reliable sources. Have tried to contact the National Archives (they should have the data somewhere), but am not getting very far in their bureacracy. There are too many discrepancies. Looks like people have tried to piece the figures together, and are coming up with wildly different answers. --Hhoblit (talk) 05:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

These Figures Don't Jive, I agree

Yeah, I think these figures aren't strictly combat losses. Even if they include maintenance losses, attrition and whatever else they still seem pretty high.

For the Air Force figures, they include both accidental and combat. They also include losses attributed to Southeast Asia but occurring elsewhere, including 6 B-52s (2 in Kadena, Okinawa, 2 at Anderson AFB, Guam, and 2 in mid-air collision over the South China Sea).Buckboard 16:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

The two SR-71 losses were confirmed accidents (one flame-out near Korat, Thailand, one rollout accident at kadena AB). The M21 (A-12/SR71 "mother ship" for drone) was deleted--the only one lost was on a test flight and it caused the program to be cancelled. Buckboard 09:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

E2C hawkeye

There is 2 E2C losses listed, however until the late 80´s the navy boasted that the Hawkeye was the only aircraft type they operate that never had a loss, either by fire or accident.

The E-2 losses are listed. Neither was an E-2C. Perhaps Navy hype was a bit misleading.--Buckboard 01:37, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

A-5 Vigilante

The A-5 never flew a combat mission as an A-5. All were converted to RA-5s before the Vietnam war. Therefore I deleted the "A-5 Vigilante" entry and will continue to do so if it recurs.--Buckboard 01:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Aircrew losses needed

It's surprisingly hard to find info on USAF/USN/USAF aircrew losses (KIA, MIA) for the entire period 1964-73. Any info would add to the utility of this entry.

B Tillman, Aug 07

I agree whole-heartedly. I've been trying since 1975 to collect and reconcile aircrew losses and identities for all US military in SEA--it's both formidable and frustrating. btw, it you are the B Tillman I think you are, you have my highest respect!--Buckboard 10:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

On 19 May 1967, LCDR James Griffin, pilot, and LT Jack Walters, Recon Attack Navigator (RAN), launched for an over-the-beach mission in the Haiphong/Hanoi area. While overhead Hanoi the aircraft was hit by enemy fire and both crewmen ejected. A radio broadcast from Hanoi announced that both men had been captured. As a result, the Navy placed Griffin and Walters in POW status.

As time passed, both Griffin and Walters were promoted, Griffin to Commander and Walters to Lieutenant Commander.

In January 1973, shortly before the POWs were released (February 1973), Hanoi announced that Griffin and Walters had died of injuries sustained during the shootdown/ejection, Walters on 20 May 1967 and Griffin on 21 May 1967. On 16 January 1974 the Secretary of the Navy verified their deaths. Hanoi returned their remains on 13 March 1974, and positive identification of both men was announced on 17 April 1974. The Democratic Republic of Vietnam offered no explanation for the five and a half year delay in announcing the deaths of the two men.

From the POW Network pages for CDR Griffin and LCDR Walters.

A-7 Corsair II

I've corrected information about its first loss; it was Dec 67, not Mar 68. 195.248.189.182 (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Australian aircraft

What about two lost Canberras in 1970-1971? I can provide some details if necessary. 195.248.189.182 (talk) 12:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Pasted text

I am pasting a paragraph of text from the article here, it looks like the user entered it in to the article by mistake, it is not dated:

This article appears to ignore the very large number of US Army aircraft (mainly helicopters) lost in the Vietnam War. A number of aircraft operated by CIA controlled organisations including 'Air America' were also lost. In the late 1970's total US aircraft losses (all types) were reported to have exceeded 5000, more than were lost in WW2. More recent it has been asserted that 5086 helicopters were lost in the war. Most of these will have been operated by the US Army.]--Gliderman

Thanks Nimbus227 (talk) 12:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

It's not so much ignored as a daunting task for which some editors, including myself, do not have data sources. if you do, please contribute by adding to the article. Thanx.--User talk:Buckboard1 09:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I've added Gary Roush's numbers. William spurlin (talk) 21:00, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

References

Aircraft disposal before returning home on carriers

I once worked with a vet from the end of the war. He was part of some helocopter rescue group, its been a long time since he told me this so I dont remember his specific wing. He told me, when the war was over and they were ordered to come home, they had shoved several aircraft off the boat into the ocean in order to make it home. Why is there no listing of these aircraft in the totals? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.135.103.152 (talk) 15:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

I think those were South Vietnamese helicopters escaping from the fall of Saigon, as they didn't intend to go back, they ditched em overboard to make room for other refugees. See Operation Frequent Wind. Ryan4314 (talk) 12:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Photos

I think this article could use some supporting materials, I've added an image of a crashed Douglas A-1 for a start. Ryan4314 (talk) 14:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

"There were aircraft losses during the Vietnam War"

If that isn't the single dumbest opening line to a Wikipedia article, I'd be surprised. Aileron Spades (talk) 00:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. Also, since when did we put a bold title of "Sources", along with a bunch of book refs at the top of each section? (bizarre...) I moved them to... (drum roll) the sources section at the bottom. I'm sure this article needs more work. - ^theWOLFchild 15:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aircraft losses of the Vietnam War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070705113957/https://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/fulltext/a_war_too_long.pdf to https://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/fulltext/a_war_too_long.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150915174306/http://mysite.verizon.net/anneled/usvictor.html to http://mysite.verizon.net/anneled/usvictor.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of aircraft losses of the Vietnam War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100203160216/http://www.popasmoke.com/helolosses.html to http://www.popasmoke.com/helolosses.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070513164016/http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/f4_39.html to http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/f4_39.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

the numbers in the article doesn't match between different parts of it

> In total, the United States lost in Vietnam almost 2,300 aircraft, helicopters and 578 UAVs (554 over Vietnam and 24 over China).

>South Vietnam's army lost 2,500 aircraft and helicopters

>USA rotary-wing[edit]

>5,086

i.e. already more than the numbers at the beginning of the article that supposedly include both helis and planes 77.34.188.102 (talk) 07:54, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Correct figures for losses ?

quote: " All told, the U.S. Air Force flew 5.25 million sorties over South Vietnam, North Vietnam, northern and southern Laos, and Cambodia, losing 2,251 aircraft: 1,737 to hostile action, and 514 in accidents. 2,197 of the losses were fixed-wing, and the remainder rotary-wing. "

The USAF lost only 54 helicopters throughout the entire conflict? Is this actually correct as maybe other losses were US Army, Navy, Marines ? 85.255.233.40 (talk) 15:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

I've been tallying up the B-52 losses of Arc Light and Linebacker II as well, and it should amount to at least 49 B-52 losses (34 F model, 9 D model, 6 G model) compared to the 31 given in its section. 34 were lost in Arc Light alone, something's not adding up here. RocketsFallOnRocketFalls (talk) 22:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)