Talk:Alex Spanos

Latest comment: 6 years ago by CAWylie in topic Dementia?

Neutrality

edit

I think that the statement "This was apparently news to the NFL..." violates the NPOV rules. Anyone else agree? Tedyc03 18:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Honestly the tone of that passage (and that of some others surrounding it) seems more colloquial and a bit amateurish than it does biased. The statement that he's unpopular in his hometown could use some support, but is not inherently non-neutral. Wouldn't it be easier to just go ahead and fix these minor mistakes than flag the whole page as "disputed"?? Rkent 00:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


I know this doesn't count as evidence, but I'm from the area where Spanos lives and I think his reputation is sort of mixed. On one hand, he donates a lot of money to the community, on the other, he has a reputation for only doing so if the result of his donation will have his name on it. I think (I'm not certain) that he was going to donate money to a local high school for a new football stadium but then refused because they wouldn't name it after him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.126.229.60 (talk) 19:47, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot (talk) 17:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dementia?

edit

The last line which claims Spanos has dementia uses a citation for Denver Broncos owner Pat Bowlen. That article makes no mention of Spanos. This sentence should be removed until someone can find a citation to support the claim that Spanos has dementia. According to the guidelines for BLP, there should not a poorly sourced and potentially libelous claim on the article. (I had removed it myself, but it was reverted as potential vandalism and I can't change it again myself. 142.116.188.167 (talk) 21:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

It's in the source given. — Wyliepedia @ 14:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply